Bruyneel Luk, Cox Bianca, Stauffer Anne, Vandenthoren Ludo, Fierens Frans, Nawrot Tim S, Horemans Christian
Independent Health Insurance Funds, Brussels, Belgium; Leuven Institute for Healthcare Policy, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
VITO Health, Flemish Institute for Technological Research (VITO), Mol, Belgium.
Environ Int. 2025 May;199:109515. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2025.109515. Epub 2025 May 1.
Low emission zones (LEZ) manage traffic entering cities by granting access only to vehicles that meet certain emission standards. This study evaluated if implementation of LEZs in Antwerp (2017) and Brussels (2018) improved air pollution within the boundaries of the defined zones, if spatial spillover effects occurred, if socioeconomic inequality in air pollution exposure changed over time, and if health was affected. The study population comprised 420,007 individuals living within the LEZs, within seventeen control cities or within adjacent areas of these cities. Annual residential air pollution (PM, PM, NO, BC) was calculated for 2016-2022. Individual-level health outcomes (diabetes, cardiovascular disease, obstructive airway diseases, antidepressants, antithrombotic agents) were available for 2014-2023. Random effect models were constructed to assess the impact of LEZs on air pollution and socioeconomic disparities, and a comparative interrupted time series analysis was conducted to evaluate the health impact. Findings suggest that with the introduction of the LEZ, all pollutant concentrations declined significantly more rapidly in both Antwerp and Brussels and adjacent areas compared to other Belgian cities and adjacent areas. Socioeconomic disparities in BC and NO concentrations decreased over time. Findings for the evolution of diabetes suggested a positive impact of the LEZ for this particular outcome. This study suggests that LEZ implementation holds strong advantages that may extend beyond the boundaries of the defined zones. As air pollution concentrations in European cities are still high, policies such as LEZs are required to attain the World Health Organisation Global Air Quality Guidelines.
低排放区(LEZ)通过只允许符合特定排放标准的车辆进入来管理进入城市的交通。本研究评估了安特卫普(2017年)和布鲁塞尔(2018年)实施低排放区是否改善了划定区域边界内的空气污染,是否发生了空间溢出效应,空气污染暴露方面的社会经济不平等是否随时间变化,以及健康是否受到影响。研究人群包括居住在低排放区内、17个对照城市内或这些城市相邻区域内的420,007个人。计算了2016 - 2022年的年度住宅空气污染(细颗粒物、可吸入颗粒物、氮氧化物、黑碳)。可获取2014 - 2023年个体层面的健康结果(糖尿病、心血管疾病、阻塞性气道疾病、抗抑郁药、抗血栓药物)。构建随机效应模型以评估低排放区对空气污染和社会经济差距的影响,并进行了比较中断时间序列分析以评估健康影响。研究结果表明,与比利时其他城市及相邻区域相比,随着低排放区的引入,安特卫普、布鲁塞尔及其相邻区域内所有污染物浓度下降得明显更快。黑碳和氮氧化物浓度方面的社会经济差距随时间减小。糖尿病演变情况的研究结果表明低排放区对这一特定结果有积极影响。本研究表明,实施低排放区具有显著优势,其影响可能超出划定区域的边界。由于欧洲城市的空气污染浓度仍然很高,需要低排放区这类政策来达到世界卫生组织全球空气质量指南的要求。
Res Rep Health Eff Inst. 2011-11
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2018-6
J Air Waste Manag Assoc. 2014-4
Res Rep Health Eff Inst. 2012-10
Res Rep Health Eff Inst. 2021-5
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2025-9-2