Suppr超能文献

扩大减少伤害干预措施对肯尼亚注射吸毒者的注射风险行为、抗逆转录病毒治疗结果及艾滋病毒发病率的影响。

Impact of scaling up harm reduction interventions on injecting risk behaviours, ART outcomes and HIV incidence among people who inject drugs in Kenya.

作者信息

Walker Josephine G, Akiyama Matthew J, Artenie Adelina, Cleland Charles M, Lizcano John A, Musyoki Helgar, Nyakowa Mercy, Cherutich Peter, Kurth Ann E, Vickerman Peter

机构信息

University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.

Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Department of Medicine, New York, NY, United States.

出版信息

Int J Drug Policy. 2025 Jun;140:104824. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2025.104824. Epub 2025 May 5.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Little data exists on the effectiveness of HIV prevention interventions among people who inject drugs (PWID) in Africa. We used empirical data from Kenya to fill this evidence gap.

METHODS

Six rounds of bio-behavioural surveys using respondent-driven-sampling were conducted among PWID in Nairobi and Coastal Kenya over 2012-2015. Dried blood spot samples were tested for HIV and HIV viral load, and HIV incidence was estimated through linking participants between rounds. Regression analyses evaluated whether self-reported usage of opioid agonist therapy (OAT) or needle and syringe programmes (NSP) in last year were associated with reduced injecting risk behaviours, increased ART uptake and viral suppression, and reduced risk of HIV acquisition.

RESULTS

Overall, 4897 PWID participated in the study, with 3903 participating in >1 round. Over the rounds, coverage increased from zero to 80-86 % for NSP and zero to 10-20 % for OAT. The proportion of people living with HIV (PLHIV) that were virally suppressed increased from 7-14 % to 39-55 %. Accessing NSP and OAT was associated with reduced syringe sharing at last injection (NSP adjusted odds ratio (aOR)=0.31; 95 %CI:0.24-0.40; OAT aOR=0.046; 95 %CI:0.034-0.061) and OAT was associated with reduced injecting frequency (adjusted rate ratio=0.21; 95 %CI:0.12-0.36). Using OAT was associated with increased ART coverage (aOR=2.76; 95 %CI:1.50-5.06) and viral suppression (aOR=2.99; 95 %CI:1.78-5.03) among PLHIV, while NSP was not. HIV incidence decreased from 6.10 (95 %CI:3.56-9.77) to 1.49 (95 %CI:0.79-2.54) per 100 person-years between the first and second half of the study. Accessing NSP was associated with lower HIV incidence (adjusted hazard ratio=0.25; 95 %CI:0.087-0.58).

CONCLUSIONS

This study provides strong evidence for the benefits of NSP and OAT on varied HIV outcomes among PWID in Africa.

摘要

引言

关于非洲注射吸毒者中艾滋病预防干预措施有效性的数据很少。我们利用肯尼亚的实证数据来填补这一证据空白。

方法

2012年至2015年期间,在内罗毕和肯尼亚沿海地区的注射吸毒者中进行了六轮采用应答者驱动抽样的生物行为调查。对干血斑样本进行艾滋病毒和艾滋病毒病毒载量检测,并通过将各轮参与者进行关联来估计艾滋病毒发病率。回归分析评估了去年自我报告使用阿片类激动剂疗法(OAT)或针头和注射器项目(NSP)是否与降低注射风险行为、增加抗逆转录病毒治疗(ART)的接受率和病毒抑制以及降低感染艾滋病毒的风险相关。

结果

总体而言,4897名注射吸毒者参与了该研究,其中3903人参与了一轮以上。在各轮调查中,NSP的覆盖率从零增加到80 - 86%,OAT的覆盖率从零增加到10 - 20%。病毒得到抑制的艾滋病毒感染者比例从7 - 14%增加到39 - 55%。使用NSP和OAT与上次注射时减少共用注射器相关(NSP调整优势比(aOR)=0.31;95%置信区间:0.24 - 0.40;OAT aOR = 0.046;95%置信区间:0.034 - 0.061),且OAT与注射频率降低相关(调整率比=0.21;95%置信区间:0.12 - 0.36)。使用OAT与艾滋病毒感染者中抗逆转录病毒治疗覆盖率增加(aOR = 2.76;95%置信区间:1.50 - 5.06)和病毒抑制(aOR = 2.99;95%置信区间:1.78 - 5.03)相关,而NSP则不然。在研究的前半期和后半期之间,艾滋病毒发病率从每100人年6.10(95%置信区间:3.56 - 9.77)降至1.49(95%置信区间:0.79 - 2.54)。使用NSP与较低的艾滋病毒发病率相关(调整风险比=0.25;95%置信区间:0.087 - 0.58)。

结论

本研究为NSP和OAT对非洲注射吸毒者多种艾滋病毒相关结果的益处提供了有力证据。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验