Department of Infectious Diseases, Research and Prevention, Public Health Service of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Department of Disease Elimination, Burnet Institute, Melbourne, Australia.
Addiction. 2023 Jun;118(6):1116-1126. doi: 10.1111/add.16147. Epub 2023 Feb 13.
Although the Netherlands, Canada and Australia were early adopters of harm reduction for people who inject drugs (PWID), their respective HIV and hepatitis C (HCV) epidemics differ. We measured the pooled effect of needle and syringe program (NSP) and opioid agonist therapy (OAT) participation on HIV and HCV incidence in these settings.
For each cohort, we emulated the design and statistical analysis of a target trial using observational data.
We included PWID at risk of HIV or HCV infection from the Amsterdam Cohort Studies (1985-2013), Vancouver Injection Drug Users Study (1997-2009) and Melbourne Injecting Drug User Cohort Study (SuperMIX) (2010-2021).
Separately for each infection and cohort (only HCV in SuperMIX), marginal structural models were used to compare the effect of comprehensive (on OAT and 100% NSP coverage or on OAT only if no recent injection drug use) versus no/partial NSP/OAT (no OAT and/or <100% NSP coverage) participation. Pooled hazard ratios (HR) and 95% CI were calculated using random-effects meta-analysis.
We observed 94 HIV seroconversions and 81 HCV seroconversions among 2023 and 430 participants, respectively. Comprehensive NSP/OAT led to a 41% lower risk of HIV acquisition (pooled HR = 0.59, 95% CI = 0.36-0.96) and a 76% lower risk of HCV acquisition (pooled HR = 0.24, 95% CI = 0.11-0.51), compared with no/partial NSP/OAT, with little heterogeneity between studies for both infections (I = 0%).
In the Netherlands, Canada and Australia, comprehensive needle and syringe program and opioid agonist therapy participation appears to substantially reduce HIV and hepatitis C acquisition compared with no or partial needle and syringe program/opioid agonist therapy participation. These findings from an emulated trial design reinforce the critical role of comprehensive access to harm reduction in optimizing infection prevention for people who inject drugs.
尽管荷兰、加拿大和澳大利亚是最早为注射吸毒者(PWID)实施减少伤害的国家,但它们各自的 HIV 和丙型肝炎(HCV)流行情况有所不同。我们测量了在这些环境中使用针具交换计划(NSP)和阿片类药物激动剂治疗(OAT)对 HIV 和 HCV 发病率的综合影响。
对于每个队列,我们使用观察性数据模拟目标试验的设计和统计分析。
我们纳入了来自阿姆斯特丹队列研究(1985-2013 年)、温哥华注射吸毒者研究(1997-2009 年)和墨尔本注射吸毒者队列研究(SuperMIX)(2010-2021 年)中具有 HIV 或 HCV 感染风险的 PWID。
分别针对每种感染和队列(仅在 SuperMIX 中针对 HCV),使用边缘结构模型比较了全面(OAT 和 100% NSP 覆盖率或如果最近没有注射吸毒则仅 OAT)与非/部分 NSP/OAT(无 OAT 和/或 <100% NSP 覆盖率)参与的效果。使用随机效应荟萃分析计算了合并危险比(HR)和 95%CI。
我们观察到在 2023 名参与者中发生了 94 例 HIV 血清转换,在 430 名参与者中发生了 81 例 HCV 血清转换。与非/部分 NSP/OAT 相比,全面的 NSP/OAT 使 HIV 感染的风险降低了 41%(合并 HR=0.59,95%CI=0.36-0.96),HCV 感染的风险降低了 76%(合并 HR=0.24,95%CI=0.11-0.51),两种感染的研究之间的异质性均较小(I ²=0%)。
在荷兰、加拿大和澳大利亚,与非全面的 NSP/OAT 相比,全面的针具交换计划和阿片类药物激动剂治疗的参与似乎大大降低了 HIV 和丙型肝炎的感染率。这种模拟试验设计的结果强化了全面获得减少伤害的重要作用,以优化注射吸毒者的感染预防。