Hammond James, Smith V Anne
Department of Biology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
School of Biology, University of St Andrews, St Andrews, UK.
J R Soc Interface. 2025 May;22(226):20240893. doi: 10.1098/rsif.2024.0893. Epub 2025 May 7.
Bayesian networks (BNs) have been used for reconstructing interactions from biological data, in disciplines ranging from molecular biology to ecology and neuroscience. BNs learn conditional dependencies between variables, which best 'explain' the data, represented as a directed graph which approximates the relationships between variables. In the 2000s, BNs were a popular method that promised an approach capable of inferring biological networks from data. Here, we review the use of BNs applied to biological data over the past two decades and evaluate their efficacy. We find that BNs are successful in inferring biological networks, frequently identifying novel interactions or network components missed by previous analyses. We suggest that as false positive results are underreported, it is difficult to assess the accuracy of BNs in inferring biological networks. BN learning appears most successful for small numbers of variables with high-quality datasets that either discretize the data into few states or include perturbative data. We suggest that BNs have failed to live up to the promise of the 2000s but that this is most likely due to experimental constraints on datasets, and the success of BNs at inferring networks in a variety of biological contexts suggests they are a powerful tool for biologists.
贝叶斯网络(BNs)已被用于从生物数据中重建相互作用,涉及从分子生物学到生态学和神经科学等多个学科。贝叶斯网络学习变量之间的条件依赖性,这些依赖性最能“解释”数据,数据以有向图表示,该有向图近似变量之间的关系。在21世纪初,贝叶斯网络是一种流行的方法,有望提供一种能够从数据中推断生物网络的途径。在此,我们回顾了过去二十年中贝叶斯网络在生物数据中的应用,并评估了它们的功效。我们发现贝叶斯网络在推断生物网络方面是成功的,经常能识别出先前分析遗漏的新的相互作用或网络组件。我们认为,由于假阳性结果报告不足,很难评估贝叶斯网络在推断生物网络方面的准确性。对于具有高质量数据集的少量变量,贝叶斯网络学习似乎最为成功,这些数据集要么将数据离散化为少数状态,要么包含微扰数据。我们认为贝叶斯网络未能兑现21世纪初的承诺,但这很可能是由于数据集的实验限制,而贝叶斯网络在各种生物背景下推断网络的成功表明它们是生物学家的有力工具。