• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

急性胆囊炎的早期腹腔镜胆囊切除术。何时风险似乎迫在眉睫?

Early Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy for Acute Cholecystitis. When Do Risks Seem Imminent?

作者信息

Mansor Salah, Zaidi Amine, Habibullah Mohammad, Hourani Rizeq, Aldali Yazan, Ghali Mohamed Said, Dawdi Salahaldeen, Suliman Idress, Alobahi Mohammed, Jarboa Lutfi, Valiyapurayil Mohamed, Zarour Ahmad

机构信息

Acute Care Surgery Section, Hamad General Hospital, HMC, Doha, Qatar.

General Surgery Department, Al-Jalla Teaching Hospital, Benghazi University, Benghazi, Libya.

出版信息

Asian J Endosc Surg. 2025 Jan-Dec;18(1):e70052. doi: 10.1111/ases.70052.

DOI:10.1111/ases.70052
PMID:40328432
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12055317/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Surgery for acute cholecystitis is time-critical; the timing of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in acute cholecystitis patients has historically been controversial because of a perceived increased risk of complications. The aim is to evaluate the impact of operative timing within 7 days of symptom onset on patient outcomes.

METHOD

A retrospective cohort study of patients who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy within 7 days after being admitted for acute cholecystitis between January 2016 and December 2021 in the Acute Care Surgery section. The study was conducted by dividing the study population into seven groups based on the operation day for each patient to evaluate the impact of operative timing on postoperative outcomes and compare the clinical results to determine how long the operation will be safe.

RESULTS

Within the study period, 3299 acute cholecystitis patients underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The mean age was 42.4 years, with 50.1% of them being women and 49.9% of them being men. The rate of patients older than 65 years was 6.2%. A total of 237 patients (7.18%) had complications; the conversion to open surgery occurred in 27 patients (0.8%); and the overall reoperation rate was 0.5% (17 patients).

CONCLUSION

Our study shows that delays in laparoscopic cholecystectomy scheduling for acute cholecystitis after 3 days from the onset of symptoms can lead to a longer operative duration as well as a longer hospital stay. However, it does not significantly impact overall complications and reoperation rates, allowing a feasible and safe procedure to be performed within 7 days.

摘要

引言

急性胆囊炎手术时机至关重要;由于认为并发症风险增加,急性胆囊炎患者行腹腔镜胆囊切除术的时机一直存在争议。目的是评估症状出现后7天内手术时机对患者预后的影响。

方法

对2016年1月至2021年12月期间在急性护理外科因急性胆囊炎入院后7天内行腹腔镜胆囊切除术的患者进行回顾性队列研究。该研究通过根据每位患者的手术日将研究人群分为七组,以评估手术时机对术后结局的影响,并比较临床结果以确定手术安全的时长。

结果

在研究期间,3299例急性胆囊炎患者接受了腹腔镜胆囊切除术。平均年龄为42.4岁,其中女性占50.1%,男性占49.9%。65岁以上患者的比例为6.2%。共有237例患者(7.18%)出现并发症;27例患者(0.8%)转为开腹手术;总体再次手术率为0.5%(17例患者)。

结论

我们的研究表明,急性胆囊炎症状出现3天后延迟安排腹腔镜胆囊切除术会导致手术时间延长以及住院时间延长。然而,这对总体并发症和再次手术率没有显著影响,使得在7天内可进行可行且安全的手术。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c8a6/12055317/d412b8d165db/ASES-18-e70052-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c8a6/12055317/3bf9097766aa/ASES-18-e70052-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c8a6/12055317/3e94558202f6/ASES-18-e70052-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c8a6/12055317/c77cd6ebe1d1/ASES-18-e70052-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c8a6/12055317/8977c78cdcdd/ASES-18-e70052-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c8a6/12055317/d412b8d165db/ASES-18-e70052-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c8a6/12055317/3bf9097766aa/ASES-18-e70052-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c8a6/12055317/3e94558202f6/ASES-18-e70052-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c8a6/12055317/c77cd6ebe1d1/ASES-18-e70052-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c8a6/12055317/8977c78cdcdd/ASES-18-e70052-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c8a6/12055317/d412b8d165db/ASES-18-e70052-g005.jpg

相似文献

1
Early Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy for Acute Cholecystitis. When Do Risks Seem Imminent?急性胆囊炎的早期腹腔镜胆囊切除术。何时风险似乎迫在眉睫?
Asian J Endosc Surg. 2025 Jan-Dec;18(1):e70052. doi: 10.1111/ases.70052.
2
Early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for lithiasic acute cholecystitis during emergency admissions. Results of a monocentric experience and review of the literature.急诊入院时针对结石性急性胆囊炎的早期与延迟腹腔镜胆囊切除术。单中心经验及文献综述结果
Tunis Med. 2016 Aug-Sep;94(8-9):519-524.
3
Early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis.急性胆囊炎的早期与延迟腹腔镜胆囊切除术
Minerva Chir. 2012 Oct;67(5):381-7.
4
Outcomes of early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis performed at a single institution.在单一机构进行的早期与延迟腹腔镜胆囊切除术治疗急性胆囊炎的疗效
Asian J Endosc Surg. 2019 Jan;12(1):74-80. doi: 10.1111/ases.12487. Epub 2018 Apr 3.
5
Comparison of Early and Interval Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy for Treatment of Acute Cholecystitis. Which is Better? A Multicentered Study.早期与间隔期腹腔镜胆囊切除术治疗急性胆囊炎的比较。哪种更好?一项多中心研究。
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2016 Dec;26(6):e117-e121. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0000000000000345.
6
Feasibility of laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis beyond 72 h of symptom onset.症状出现超过72小时的急性胆囊炎行腹腔镜胆囊切除术的可行性。
Updates Surg. 2016 Dec;68(4):377-383. doi: 10.1007/s13304-016-0409-5. Epub 2016 Oct 26.
7
Evaluation of early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the treatment of acute cholecystitis.早期与延迟腹腔镜胆囊切除术治疗急性胆囊炎的疗效评估。
Hepatogastroenterology. 2009 Jan-Feb;56(89):26-8.
8
Impact of surgical timing on postoperative quality of life in acute cholecystitis: a comparative analysis of early, intermediate, and delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy.手术时机对急性胆囊炎术后生活质量的影响:早期、中期和延迟腹腔镜胆囊切除术的比较分析
Surg Endosc. 2025 Apr;39(4):2489-2497. doi: 10.1007/s00464-025-11620-9. Epub 2025 Feb 25.
9
Early Versus Delayed Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy For Acute Cholecystitis.急性胆囊炎的早期与延迟腹腔镜胆囊切除术
J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. 2017 Oct-Dec;29(4):570-573.
10
Acute cholecystitis: early versus delayed cholecystectomy, a multicenter randomized trial (ACDC study, NCT00447304).急性胆囊炎:早期与延迟胆囊切除术的多中心随机试验(ACDC 研究,NCT00447304)。
Ann Surg. 2013 Sep;258(3):385-93. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3182a1599b.

本文引用的文献

1
Evaluation of early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy in acute calculous cholecystitis: a prospective, randomized study.急性结石性胆囊炎早期与延迟腹腔镜胆囊切除术的评估:一项前瞻性随机研究。
J Minim Invasive Surg. 2022 Dec 15;25(4):139-144. doi: 10.7602/jmis.2022.25.4.139.
2
Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy in Acute Cholecystitis: Refining the Best Surgical Timing Through Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials.腹腔镜胆囊切除术治疗急性胆囊炎:通过随机试验的网络荟萃分析优化最佳手术时机。
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2022 Dec 1;32(6):755-763. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0000000000001103.
3
Timing of early laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute calculous cholecystitis: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.
急性结石性胆囊炎早期腹腔镜胆囊切除术时机的荟萃分析:随机临床试验研究。
World J Emerg Surg. 2021 Mar 25;16(1):16. doi: 10.1186/s13017-021-00360-5.
4
Timing of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in acute cholecystitis.腹腔镜胆囊切除术治疗急性胆囊炎的时机。
Niger J Clin Pract. 2021 Feb;24(2):156-160. doi: 10.4103/njcp.njcp_138_20.
5
Pathophysiology and pathology of acute cholecystitis: A secondary publication of the Japanese version from 1992.急性胆囊炎的病理生理学与病理学:1992年日文版的二次出版
J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2022 Feb;29(2):212-216. doi: 10.1002/jhbp.912. Epub 2021 Mar 27.
6
2020 World Society of Emergency Surgery updated guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute calculus cholecystitis.2020 年世界急诊外科学会更新了急性结石性胆囊炎的诊断和治疗指南。
World J Emerg Surg. 2020 Nov 5;15(1):61. doi: 10.1186/s13017-020-00336-x.
7
Mini-cholecystectomy versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a retrospective multicentric study among patients operated in some Eastern Libyan hospitals.迷你胆囊切除术与腹腔镜胆囊切除术:对利比亚东部一些医院接受手术的患者进行的回顾性多中心研究。
Turk J Surg. 2019 Sep 23;35(3):185-190. doi: 10.5578/turkjsurg.4208. eCollection 2019 Sep.
8
Optimum timing of emergency cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis in England: population-based cohort study.英格兰急性胆囊炎行急诊胆囊切除术的最佳时机:基于人群的队列研究。
Surg Endosc. 2019 Aug;33(8):2495-2502. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6537-x. Epub 2019 Apr 4.
9
Acute cholecystitis - a cohort study in a real-world clinical setting (REWO study, NCT02796443).急性胆囊炎——一项真实临床环境中的队列研究(REWO研究,NCT02796443)
Pragmat Obs Res. 2018 Oct 25;9:69-75. doi: 10.2147/POR.S169255. eCollection 2018.
10
Outcome trends and safety measures after 30 years of laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a systematic review and pooled data analysis.腹腔镜胆囊切除术 30 年后的结局趋势和安全措施:系统评价和汇总数据分析。
Surg Endosc. 2018 May;32(5):2175-2183. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5974-2. Epub 2018 Mar 19.