Covered TIPS Created with Viatorr Versus Fluency Stent-Grafts for the Refractory Ascites in Patients with Cirrhosis: An Observational Study.

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

To compare the long-term clinical efficacy and safety of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) created with Fluency versus Viatorr stent-grafts for the treatment of refractory ascites in patients with cirrhosis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective analysis was conducted on 118 cirrhotic patients with refractory ascites undergoing TIPS with Fluency stent-grafts (Fluency group, n=83) or Viatorr stent-grafts (Viatorr group, n=35) at two centers from January 2017 to December 2021. Competing risk analysis was used to compare the incidence of clinical outcomes between groups after adjusting for confounders.

RESULTS

During a median of 30.9 months follow-up, 31 patients (26.3%) developed portal hypertension complications (11 cases of recurrent ascites, 16 cases of variceal bleeding, and four cases of both ascites and variceal bleeding), 15 patients (12.7%) developed shunt dysfunction, 58 patients (49.15%) developed overt hepatic encephalopathy (OHE), and 74 patients (62.7%) died. After adjusting for confounding factors, the Viatorr stent was associated with a reduced OHE risk (38% vs 54% at 5 years, p=0.004) but a comparable incidence of portal hypertension complications (27% vs 27%, p=0.536), shunt dysfunction (14% vs 12%, p=0.401), and mortality (41% vs 37%; p=0.064) compared to the Fluency stents. These findings were consistent across most relevant subgroups.

CONCLUSION

In cirrhotic patients with refractory ascites undergoing TIPS, Viatorr stent-grafts were associated with lower risk of OHE while no significant differences in clinical efficacy compared to the Fluency stent-grafts.