Limato Ralalicia, Elmira Elza Samantha, Hai Yen Nguyen, Truong Anh Quan, Hai Yen Duong, Limmathurotsakul Direk, Karkey Abhilasha, Hamers Raph L, Patel Twisha S, Lessa Fernanda C, Dodds-Ashley Elizabeth, Anderson Deverick, van Doorn H Rogier, Vu Huong
Faculty of Medicine Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia.
Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
BMJ Open Qual. 2025 May 6;14(2):e003074. doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2024-003074.
International guidelines are available for the assessment and improvement of antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) programmes: an important strategy to address the escalating global antimicrobial resistance problem. However, existing AMS assessment tools lack contextual specificity for resource-limited settings, leading to limited applicability in Asia. This project aimed to identify relevant themes from current guidance documents to help develop a context-specific assessment tool that can be applied by healthcare facilities (HCFs) to improve local implementation.We performed a sequential approach of a scoping review to identify relevant assessment themes for Asia and an expert survey for getting feedback on the relevance of assessment stems developed from the scoping review. We reviewed English-language published documents discussing AMS implementation or assessment at HCFs globally and in Asia. Themes were derived through content analysis and classified following the predefined context dimensions to develop assessment stems, defined as containing one identified determinant that may influence implementation outcomes. The survey consisting of identified assessment stems was reviewed by 20 locally identified experts in Asia who rated the level of relevance of these stems in AMS implementation in the region.National leadership, training and technical support, and policy and guidance were the most commonly identified themes among 100 themes identified from 73 reviewed documents. From these themes, we developed 131 assessment stems for the expert survey. Of the 131 assessment stems, 117 (89%) were considered relevant for AMS implementation in Asia by at least 80% of respondents. These stems were included in the process of developing a global AMS assessment tool to support HCFs to improve their programmes.In conclusion, national leadership and support represent a distinct and important aspect affecting AMS implementation in HCFs in Asia. The identified assessment themes have substantial value for the formulation of locally relevant implementation strategies tailored to the Asian context.
国际上有用于评估和改进抗菌药物管理(AMS)计划的指南:这是应对全球抗菌药物耐药性问题不断升级的一项重要策略。然而,现有的AMS评估工具缺乏针对资源有限环境的背景特异性,导致在亚洲的适用性有限。本项目旨在从当前的指导文件中确定相关主题,以帮助开发一种针对具体情况的评估工具,可供医疗机构(HCFs)应用,以改进当地的实施情况。我们采用了一种顺序式方法,即先进行范围审查以确定亚洲相关的评估主题,然后进行专家调查,以获取对从范围审查中得出的评估项目相关性的反馈。我们审查了全球和亚洲范围内关于医疗机构AMS实施或评估的英文发表文献。通过内容分析得出主题,并按照预先定义的背景维度进行分类,以制定评估项目,评估项目被定义为包含一个可能影响实施结果的已确定决定因素。由已确定的评估项目组成的调查问卷由20位在亚洲当地确定的专家进行审查,他们对这些项目在该地区AMS实施中的相关程度进行评分。在从73篇审查文献中确定的100个主题中,国家领导力、培训和技术支持以及政策和指导是最常被确定的主题。基于这些主题,我们为专家调查制定了131个评估项目。在这131个评估项目中,至少80%的受访者认为其中117个(89%)与亚洲的AMS实施相关。这些项目被纳入了全球AMS评估工具的开发过程中,以支持医疗机构改进其计划。总之,国家领导力和支持是影响亚洲医疗机构AMS实施的一个独特且重要的方面。所确定的评估主题对于制定适合亚洲背景的当地相关实施策略具有重要价值。