Walbaum Magdalena, Jana-Valencia Nicolas
Care Policy and Evaluation Centre, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK.
Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, Kings College London, London, UK.
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2025 May 6. doi: 10.1007/s40258-025-00972-x.
Ankylosing spondylitis is a complex rheumatic disease, characterised by chronic and progressive inflammation of the spine, causing an important health and economic burden for the person with the condition. Evidence shows the unequal impact of the disease in different groups of people, with a higher burden for lower socioeconomic groups. The objective of this study is to evaluate the impact of the use of biologics for the treatment of ankylosing spondylitis on health inequities in Chile.
We conducted an aggregate distributional cost-effectiveness analysis. Data on health outcomes and costs were derived from a cost-effectiveness model of secukinumab, etanercept, certolizumab pegol, infliximab, adalimumab and golimumab versus treatment as usual for the treatment of ankylosing spondylitis from the Chilean healthcare system perspective. Health gains and health opportunity costs were distributed across socioeconomic subgroups. Health and equity impacts, measured using the Atkinson index, were assessed on an equity-efficiency impact plane.
All treatments had a positive impact on equity relative to treatment as usual. At an opportunity cost threshold of 1 Gross Domestic Product per capita/quality-adjusted life-year, secukinumab improved societal welfare irrespective of the Atkinson index value. When varying thresholds (2 and 3 Gross Domestic Product), all assessed technologies contributed to an increase in societal welfare, regardless of the Atkinson index.
Biologic treatment for ankylosing spondylitis, such as secukinumab, may reduce health inequity in the Chilean population. An aggregate distributional cost-effectiveness analysis framework is feasible to implement alongside a cost-effectiveness analysis in the context of the Chilean healthcare system to provide additional information of equity impacts for health technology assessment recommendations and policy making.
强直性脊柱炎是一种复杂的风湿性疾病,其特征为脊柱的慢性进行性炎症,给患者带来了重大的健康和经济负担。有证据表明,该疾病对不同人群的影响存在差异,社会经济地位较低的群体负担更重。本研究的目的是评估使用生物制剂治疗强直性脊柱炎对智利健康不平等的影响。
我们进行了一项总体分布成本效益分析。健康结果和成本数据来自于从智利医疗保健系统角度出发的司库奇尤单抗、依那西普、赛妥珠单抗、英夫利昔单抗、阿达木单抗和戈利木单抗与常规治疗相比治疗强直性脊柱炎的成本效益模型。健康收益和健康机会成本在社会经济亚组中进行了分配。使用阿特金森指数衡量的健康和公平影响在公平效率影响平面上进行了评估。
相对于常规治疗,所有治疗方法对公平性都有积极影响。在人均1个国内生产总值/质量调整生命年的机会成本阈值下,无论阿特金森指数值如何,司库奇尤单抗都改善了社会福利。当改变阈值(2和3个国内生产总值)时,所有评估的技术都有助于提高社会福利,无论阿特金森指数如何。
司库奇尤单抗等强直性脊柱炎生物治疗可能会减少智利人群中的健康不平等。在智利医疗保健系统的背景下,总体分布成本效益分析框架与成本效益分析一起实施是可行的,可为卫生技术评估建议和政策制定提供公平影响的额外信息。