Suppr超能文献

两种用于拔除下颌管附近下颌水平阻生第三磨牙的手术技术比较:移位复位法和远离神经法。

Comparison of two surgical techniques for the extraction of mandibular horizontally impacted third molars near the mandibular canal: the displacement reduction method and the away-from-nerve method.

作者信息

Ye Zhou-Xi, Qian Wen-Hao, Wu Yu-Bo, Yang Chi

机构信息

Laboratory of Dental Biomaterials and Tissue Regeneration, Shanghai Xuhui District Stomatological Hospital, No. 500, Fenglin Rd, Shanghai, 200032, People's Republic of China.

Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.

出版信息

Clin Oral Investig. 2025 May 7;29(6):287. doi: 10.1007/s00784-025-06366-6.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To introduce two surgical techniques for extracting horizontally impacted wisdom teeth near the mandibular nerve canal and to assess their effectiveness.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This study involved patients requiring extraction of horizontally impacted wisdom teeth near the mandibular canal from January to December 2024. Cases were grouped into three categories: close, compressing, and intruding into the mandibular canal. Depending on the tooth's position relative to the nerve canal, it was classified as lingual, middle, or buccal. Extractions were carried out using either the displacement reduction technique or the away-from-nerve method. Surgical time, postoperative swelling, VAS index, and inferior alveolar nerve injuries were documented.

RESULTS

The displacement reduction technique was selected for 50 cases, and the away-from-nerve method for another 50. Among the teeth that contacted the mandibular nerve canal, 80% chose the away-from-nerve method, and among teeth intruding into the nerve canal, 93.1% opted for the displacement reduction technique. When the canal was lingual to the tooth, 81.5% chose the displacement reduction technique, and when buccal, only 23.7% did so (p < 0.05). The displacement reduction technique resulted in a mean surgical time of 15.38 ± 4.35 min, significantly shorter than the away-from-nerve method (12.10 ± 3.60 min, p < 0.05). Patients underwent the displacement reduction technique had lower VAS scores (p < 0.05) and less swelling (p < 0.05). Among all patients, 3 suffered postoperative nerve injuries.

CONCLUSION

Both techniques are viable for extracting horizontally impacted wisdom teeth near the mandibular canal, with minor postoperative reactions and a low risk of postoperative nerve injury.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Both surgical techniques for extracting impacted wisdom teeth near the mandibular canals reduce postoperative complications and the risk of nerve injury.

摘要

目的

介绍两种用于拔除下颌神经管附近水平阻生智齿的手术技术,并评估其有效性。

材料与方法

本研究纳入了2024年1月至12月需要拔除下颌管附近水平阻生智齿的患者。病例分为三类:靠近、压迫和侵入下颌管。根据牙齿相对于神经管的位置,将其分为舌侧、中间或颊侧。采用移位复位技术或离神经法进行拔牙。记录手术时间、术后肿胀情况、视觉模拟评分(VAS)指数以及下牙槽神经损伤情况。

结果

50例患者选择了移位复位技术,另外50例选择了离神经法。在接触下颌神经管的牙齿中,80%选择了离神经法,而在侵入神经管的牙齿中,93.1%选择了移位复位技术。当神经管位于牙齿舌侧时,81.5%选择了移位复位技术,而当位于颊侧时,只有23.7%选择该技术(p<0.05)。移位复位技术的平均手术时间为15.38±4.35分钟,明显短于离神经法(12.10±3.60分钟,p<0.05)。接受移位复位技术的患者VAS评分较低(p<0.05),肿胀程度较轻(p<0.05)。所有患者中,有3例出现术后神经损伤。

结论

两种技术都可用于拔除下颌管附近的水平阻生智齿,术后反应轻微,术后神经损伤风险低。

临床意义

两种拔除下颌管附近阻生智齿的手术技术均能减少术后并发症及神经损伤风险。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验