Ge Jing, Yang Chi, Zheng Jia-Wei, He Dong-Mei, Zheng Ling-Yan, Hu Ying-Kai
PhD Student, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Full Professor, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2014 Nov;72(11):2126-33. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2014.05.028. Epub 2014 Jun 14.
Piezosurgery has been used widely in oral and maxillofacial surgery, but there has been no report systematically describing an osteotomy method with piezosurgery for complicated mandibular third molar removal. The aim of this study was to introduce 4 osteotomy methods using piezosurgery and evaluate their effects.
A retrospective study was conducted of patients with a complicated impacted mandibular third molar requiring extraction. The predictor variable was the extraction technique. Four osteotomy methods using piezosurgery were tested according to different impaction types: method 1 involved complete bone removal; method 2 involved segmental bone removal; method 3 involved bone removal combined with tooth splitting; and method 4 involved block bone removal. Outcome variables were success rate, operative time, major complications (including nerve injury, mandible fracture, severe hematoma, or severe edema), and serious pyogenic infection. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics.
The study was composed of 55 patients with 74 complicated impacted mandibular third molars. All impacted mandibular third molars were removed successfully. The average surgical time was 15 minutes (range, 8 to 26 minutes). Thirty-eight molars (51.4%) were extracted by method 1, 18 molars (24.3%) by method 2, 12 molars (16.2%) by method 3, and 6 molars (8.1%) by method 4. Two cases (2.7%) developed postoperative infections and recovered within 1 week using drainage and antibiotic administration.
The 4 osteotomy methods with piezosurgery provide effective ways of removing complicated impacted mandibular third molars.
压电手术已在口腔颌面外科广泛应用,但尚无系统描述使用压电手术进行复杂下颌第三磨牙拔除的截骨方法的报告。本研究的目的是介绍4种使用压电手术的截骨方法并评估其效果。
对需要拔除复杂下颌阻生第三磨牙的患者进行回顾性研究。预测变量为拔牙技术。根据不同的阻生类型测试了4种使用压电手术的截骨方法:方法1为完全去除骨组织;方法2为分段去除骨组织;方法3为去除骨组织并结合牙齿劈开;方法4为整块去除骨组织。观察变量为成功率、手术时间、主要并发症(包括神经损伤、下颌骨骨折、严重血肿或严重水肿)和严重化脓性感染。使用描述性统计分析数据。
本研究纳入55例患者,共74颗复杂下颌阻生第三磨牙。所有下颌阻生第三磨牙均成功拔除。平均手术时间为15分钟(范围8至26分钟)。方法1拔除38颗磨牙(51.4%),方法2拔除18颗磨牙(24.3%),方法3拔除12颗磨牙(16.2%),方法4拔除6颗磨牙(8.1%)。2例(2.7%)发生术后感染,经引流和抗生素治疗后1周内康复。
4种使用压电手术的截骨方法为拔除复杂下颌阻生第三磨牙提供了有效的途径。