Suppr超能文献

环硅酸锆钠与聚苯乙烯磺酸钠治疗血液透析患者高钾血症的随机临床试验

Sodium zirconium cyclosilicate versus sodium polystyrene sulfonate for treatment of hyperkalemia in hemodialysis patients: a randomized clinical trial.

作者信息

Elsayed Mohamed Mamdouh, Abdelrahman Marwa Ahmed, Sorour Abdelrazik Mohamed, Rizk Islam Ghanem, Hassab Mohamed Aly Abdelhalim

机构信息

Nephrology and Internal Medicine Department, Faculty of Medicine, Alexandria University, Alkhartoom Square, El Azareeta, Alexandria, 21131, Egypt.

Nephrology Department, Alexandria Petroleum Hospital, Alexandria, Egypt.

出版信息

BMC Nephrol. 2025 May 6;26(1):227. doi: 10.1186/s12882-025-04129-9.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Hyperkalemia is a frequent life-threatening condition in hemodialysis (HD) patients. Data comparing the usage of various K + binders in HD patients is still scarce. This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of Sodium zirconium cyclosilicate (SZC) and sodium polystyrene sulfonate (SPS) for treatment of hyperkalemia in HD patients.

METHODS

This prospective, double-blinded, randomized multicenter clinical trial enrolled 120 HD patients with predialysis serum potassium > 5 mmol/L. Patients were randomized to receive SZC (5 g, 3 times/wk on non-dialysis days, 15 gm/wk) or SPS (15 g, 3 times/wk on non-dialysis days, 45 gm/wk) for 8 weeks. The change in serum potassium through the 8 weeks of the study was our primary outcome.

RESULTS

Serum potassium significantly decreased in both groups compared to baseline values from the first week till the end of the study with p value of < 0.001 and < 0.001 respectively. Serum K levels in the SZC group were significantly lower (achieved normokalemia after 2 weeks) than K levels in the SPS group (achieved normokalemia after 6 weeks) through the study period (p < 0.001). Rescue therapy for hyperkalemia was less frequent in the SZC group (3.3%) than the SPS group (6.6%) (p = 0.678). Gastrointestinal side effects were non significantly fewer with SZC (5%) compared to SPS (11.6%). However, SPS was less palatable (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

When compared to SPS treatment, SZC was associated with a more rapid and efficacious resolution of hyperkalemia with potentially a better safety profile and palatability among HD patients.

CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT06029179. First registration date: 9/01/2023.

摘要

背景

高钾血症是血液透析(HD)患者中常见的危及生命的病症。比较HD患者中各种钾结合剂使用情况的数据仍然匮乏。本研究旨在比较环硅酸锆钠(SZC)和聚苯乙烯磺酸钠(SPS)治疗HD患者高钾血症的疗效和安全性。

方法

这项前瞻性、双盲、随机多中心临床试验纳入了120例透析前血清钾>5 mmol/L的HD患者。患者被随机分为接受SZC(5 g,非透析日每周3次,每周15 g)或SPS(15 g,非透析日每周3次,每周45 g)治疗8周。研究8周期间血清钾的变化是我们的主要结局。

结果

与基线值相比,两组血清钾从研究第一周直至结束均显著降低,p值分别<0.001和<0.001。在整个研究期间,SZC组的血清钾水平显著低于SPS组(2周后达到正常血钾水平)(6周后达到正常血钾水平)(p<0.001)。SZC组高钾血症的抢救治疗频率(3.3%)低于SPS组(6.6%)(p = 0.678)。与SPS(11.6%)相比,SZC(5%)的胃肠道副作用减少不显著。然而,SPS的口感较差(p<0.001)。

结论

与SPS治疗相比,SZC可使HD患者更快、更有效地缓解高钾血症,且可能具有更好的安全性和口感。

临床试验注册

ClinicalTrials.gov标识符:NCT06029179。首次注册日期:2023年1月9日。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7f39/12054224/8453fa2aab1f/12882_2025_4129_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验