Suppr超能文献

Stretta射频与抗反流黏膜切除术治疗难治性胃食管反流病的比较研究:一项来自韩国的单中心回顾性研究

The comparative study of Stretta radiofrequency and anti-reflux mucosectomy in the management of intractable gastroesophageal reflux disease: a single-center retrospective study from Korea.

作者信息

Lee Ah Young, Choi Ji Woo, Heo Jeong Haeng, Chung Jun Young, Kim Seong Hwan, Cho Joo Young

机构信息

Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, CHA Gangnam Medical Center, CHA University, CHA University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

出版信息

Clin Endosc. 2025 May;58(3):409-417. doi: 10.5946/ce.2024.163. Epub 2025 May 7.

Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Chronic gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) requires symptom relief and treatment of associated conditions. In this study, we aimed to compare anti-reflux mucosectomy (ARMS) and Stretta radiofrequency (SRF) for treating patients with chronic GERD who are unresponsive to proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) and to identify the indications for each procedure.

METHODS

Data of patients who underwent ARMS or SRF between March 2021 and April 2023 were analyzed. Changes in GERD questionnaire (GERDQ) scores, endoscopic Los Angeles (LA) grade, flap valve grade (FVG) based on Hill's type, EndoFLIP distensibility index (DI), endoscopic Barrett's epithelium (BE) resolution rate, and PPI withdrawal rate were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

Improvements in the GERDQ scores and PPI withdrawal rates were similar between the groups. The ARMS group showed significantly better changes in endoscopic LA grade, FVG, and EndoFLIP DI than the SRF group. The complications were more prevalent in the ARMS group than in the SRF group.

CONCLUSIONS

The change in endoscopic LA grade before and after the procedure was significantly higher in the ARMS group than in the SRF group. Significant improvements in endoscopic FVG, BE resolution, and EndoFLIP DI were observed only with the ARMS group.

摘要

背景/目的:慢性胃食管反流病(GERD)需要缓解症状并治疗相关病症。在本研究中,我们旨在比较抗反流黏膜切除术(ARMS)和Stretta射频治疗(SRF)对质子泵抑制剂(PPI)治疗无效的慢性GERD患者的疗效,并确定每种手术的适应症。

方法

分析了2021年3月至2023年4月期间接受ARMS或SRF治疗的患者的数据。比较了两组之间GERD问卷(GERDQ)评分、内镜下洛杉矶(LA)分级、基于希尔类型的瓣叶瓣膜分级(FVG)、EndoFLIP扩张性指数(DI)、内镜下巴雷特上皮(BE)消退率和PPI停药率的变化。

结果

两组之间GERDQ评分和PPI停药率的改善情况相似。ARMS组在内镜下LA分级、FVG和EndoFLIP DI方面的变化明显优于SRF组。ARMS组的并发症比SRF组更普遍。

结论

ARMS组术后内镜下LA分级的变化明显高于SRF组。仅在ARMS组中观察到内镜下FVG、BE消退和EndoFLIP DI有显著改善。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eddb/12138365/917329f70555/ce-2024-163f1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验