Effective new predictors of prognosis and comparison of multidisciplinary treatment options in acute mesenteric ischemia.

OBJECTIVE

It was aimed to compare the prognostic risk factors and multidisciplinary treatments affecting mortality in acute mesenteric ischemia (AMI).

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 111 patients treated for acute mesenteric ischemia between January 2012 and January 2023. Patients were divided into 2 groups as alive and dead for early survey (postoperative 28 days). The characteristics of the two groups were compared and the factors affecting early mortality were investigated. Factors affecting the presence of perioperative ischemia, the length of ischemia, the length of the resected bowel, and the length of the remaining small bowel from the ligament of Treitz were investigated. The results of different treatment processes were analyzed.

RESULTS

The mean age was 71.67, years with 64 (57.6%) males and 47 (42.3%) females. Early mortality rate was 47.7%. Envas was applied to 9 (8.1%) patients. EnvasSurg to 19 (17.1%) patients. Surg to 71 (64%) and SurgEnvas to 12 (10.8%) patients during the treatment process. Preoperative D-dimer (p=0.013). lactate (p=0.006). creatine (p=0.001). LAR (p=0.031) were significantly different between the groups when compared according to the treatment process. The resected bowel length was significantly less in patients who underwent EnvasSurg compared to the other groups (p=0.002), CCI (p=0.041), D-dimer (p=0.016), lactate (p<0.001), creatine (p<0.001), LAR (p<0.001) and ischemia length (p<0.001) were found to be significantly different between the groups.

CONCLUSION

The prognosis can be predicted with serum-based blood tests and indicators at the time of diagnosis, and organ loss and prognosis can be changed with the selected treatment process.