Monaco Francesco, Vignapiano Annarita, D'Angelo Martina, Raffone Fabiola, Di Stefano Valeria, Boccia Antonella, Longobardi Anna, Gruttola Benedetta Di, Fornaro Michele, Corrivetti Giulio, Martino Iolanda, Steardo Luca, Steardo Luca
Department of Mental Health, Azienda Sanitaria Locale (ASL) Salerno, Salerno, Italy.
European Biomedical Research Institute of Salerno (EBRIS), Salerno, Italy.
Front Psychiatry. 2025 Apr 22;16:1576179. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1576179. eCollection 2025.
The intersection of psychiatry and medicine presents unique diagnostic and ethical challenges, particularly for conditions involving significant brain-body interactions, such as psychosomatic, somatopsychic, and complex systemic disorders. This article explores the historical and contemporary issues in diagnosing such conditions, emphasizing the fragmentation of medical and psychiatric knowledge, biases in clinical guidelines, and the mismanagement of complex illnesses. Diagnostic errors often arise from insufficient integration between general medicine and psychiatry, compounded by the reliance on population-based guidelines that neglect individual patient needs. Misclassification of conditions like myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS), Lyme disease, and fibromyalgia as psychosomatic or psychogenic has led to stigmatization and delayed care. While these conditions are referenced as emblematic examples of misclassified and poorly understood disorders, the five clinical cases discussed in this article do not directly illustrate these diseases. Instead, they exemplify shared diagnostic and ethical dilemmas at the medicine-psychiatry interface, including uncertainty, fragmentation, and the risk of epistemic injustice. The article critically examines terms like medically unexplained symptoms and functional disorders, highlighting their limitations and potential for misuse. Case examples underscore the consequences of diagnostic inaccuracies and the urgent need for improved approaches. Ethical considerations are also explored, emphasizing respecting patient experiences, promoting individualized care, and acknowledging the inherent uncertainties in medical diagnosis. Advances in technologies such as brain imaging and molecular diagnostics offer hope for bridging the gap between psychiatry and medicine, enabling more accurate assessments and better patient outcomes. The article concludes by advocating comprehensive training at the medicine-psychiatry interface and a patient-centered approach that integrates clinical observation, research insights, and a nuanced understanding of mind-body dynamics.
精神病学与医学的交叉领域带来了独特的诊断和伦理挑战,尤其是对于涉及大脑与身体显著相互作用的病症,如身心疾病、躯体心理疾病和复杂的系统性疾病。本文探讨了诊断此类病症的历史和当代问题,强调了医学和精神病学知识的碎片化、临床指南中的偏见以及复杂疾病的管理不善。诊断错误往往源于普通医学与精神病学之间缺乏充分整合,同时还因依赖忽视个体患者需求的基于人群的指南而加剧。将肌痛性脑脊髓炎/慢性疲劳综合征(ME/CFS)、莱姆病和纤维肌痛等病症错误分类为身心疾病或心因性疾病,导致了污名化和治疗延误。虽然这些病症被作为错误分类和理解不足的疾病的典型例子提及,但本文讨论的五个临床案例并未直接说明这些疾病。相反,它们例证了医学与精神病学交叉领域共有的诊断和伦理困境,包括不确定性、碎片化以及认知不公正的风险。本文批判性地审视了诸如医学无法解释的症状和功能性障碍等术语,强调了它们的局限性和被滥用的可能性。案例示例强调了诊断不准确的后果以及改进方法的迫切需求。还探讨了伦理考量,强调尊重患者体验、促进个性化治疗以及承认医学诊断中固有的不确定性。脑成像和分子诊断等技术的进步为弥合精神病学与医学之间的差距带来了希望,能够实现更准确的评估和更好的患者治疗效果。本文最后倡导在医学与精神病学交叉领域进行全面培训,并采用以患者为中心的方法,将临床观察、研究见解以及对身心动态的细致理解整合起来。