• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美国国立卫生研究院支持放射肿瘤学研究的资金:2011 - 2021年十年间的比较趋势分析

National Institutes of Health Funding to Support Radiation Oncology Research: A Comparative Trend Analysis Over a Decade, 2011-2021.

作者信息

Razavi Amir, Rooney Michael K, Fuller Clifton D, Yu James B, Pfister Neil T, Thomas Charles R, Buatti John M, Kamran Sophia C, McGee Heather M, Yeboa Debra Nana, Kiess Ana P, Baschnagel Andrew M, Kimple Randall J

机构信息

Department of Radiation Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.

Department of Radiation Oncology, St. Francis Hospital, Hartford, Connecticut.

出版信息

Adv Radiat Oncol. 2025 Apr 22;10(6):101767. doi: 10.1016/j.adro.2025.101767. eCollection 2025 Jun.

DOI:10.1016/j.adro.2025.101767
PMID:40330712
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12051116/
Abstract

PURPOSE

Funding to support radiation oncology discovery and research is essential for advancement in therapeutic strategies to improve outcomes for patients with cancer. We aimed to comprehensively characterize trends in National Institutes of Health (NIH) funding that supports radiation oncology research over time to identify trends, successes, and areas for improvement.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

We queried the NIH Research Portfolio Online Reporting Tools Expenditures and Results database to identify all awarded grants to support radiation oncology research conducted by principal investigators at academic centers, using 3 individual years as representative samples (2011, 2016, and 2021). Abstracts and keywords for resulting grants were manually searched to identify resulting awards topically related to the field of radiation oncology; principal investigators departmental affiliation was also used as a supplemental method serving as a sensitivity analysis to define radiation oncology-related research. Descriptive statistics were used to describe patterns in funding. χ testing was used to assess differences in proportions of categorical variables.

RESULTS

Less than 0.5% of the total NIH budget and < 2% of the total National Cancer Institute budget supported radiation oncology research during the representative study years. There were no significant changes in this allocation pattern over time. A small cohort of institutions held a relatively large proportion of NIH-supported radiation oncology grant funding. Individuals holding PhDs alone received the majority of funding (62%), whereas those with dual-degrees (MD/PhD) held 21% of funding, and those with MD alone were awarded 17% of funding. There was a trend toward an increased proportion of grants awarded to MD/PhDs over time (24% vs 15% in 2021 and 2011, respectively, = .075).

CONCLUSIONS

Despite radiation therapy's essential role in multidisciplinary cancer care, NIH, and National Cancer Institute funding to support radiation oncology research has remained disproportionally low over the last decade. These data may be useful to inform future policy aimed at promoting research advancement in radiation oncology both at the micro (individual) as well as macro (institutional and national) level.

摘要

目的

资助支持放射肿瘤学发现和研究对于推进治疗策略以改善癌症患者的治疗结果至关重要。我们旨在全面描述美国国立卫生研究院(NIH)资助放射肿瘤学研究的趋势,以确定发展趋势、成功之处和改进领域。

方法和材料

我们查询了NIH研究项目在线报告工具支出与结果数据库,以识别学术中心的主要研究者获得的所有支持放射肿瘤学研究的资助,使用3个单独年份作为代表性样本(2011年、2016年和2021年)。对所得资助的摘要和关键词进行人工搜索,以识别与放射肿瘤学领域主题相关的所得奖项;主要研究者的部门隶属关系也用作补充方法,作为敏感性分析来定义与放射肿瘤学相关的研究。使用描述性统计来描述资助模式。χ检验用于评估分类变量比例的差异。

结果

在代表性研究年份中,NIH总预算的不到0.5%以及国家癌症研究所总预算的不到2%用于支持放射肿瘤学研究。随着时间的推移,这种分配模式没有显著变化。一小部分机构获得了相对较大比例的NIH资助的放射肿瘤学研究经费。仅拥有博士学位的个人获得了大部分资助(62%),而拥有双学位(医学博士/哲学博士)的人获得了21%的资助,仅拥有医学博士学位的人获得了17%的资助。随着时间的推移,授予医学博士/哲学博士的资助比例有增加的趋势(2021年和2011年分别为24%和15%,P = 0.075)。

结论

尽管放射治疗在多学科癌症治疗中起着至关重要的作用,但在过去十年中,NIH和国家癌症研究所用于支持放射肿瘤学研究的资金仍然不成比例地低。这些数据可能有助于为未来旨在促进放射肿瘤学在微观(个人)以及宏观(机构和国家)层面研究进展的政策提供参考。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c083/12051116/6bd05c1dd840/gr4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c083/12051116/6ea2cf689bad/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c083/12051116/112c10a06ed8/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c083/12051116/4ad102586cf8/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c083/12051116/6bd05c1dd840/gr4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c083/12051116/6ea2cf689bad/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c083/12051116/112c10a06ed8/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c083/12051116/4ad102586cf8/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c083/12051116/6bd05c1dd840/gr4.jpg

相似文献

1
National Institutes of Health Funding to Support Radiation Oncology Research: A Comparative Trend Analysis Over a Decade, 2011-2021.美国国立卫生研究院支持放射肿瘤学研究的资金:2011 - 2021年十年间的比较趋势分析
Adv Radiat Oncol. 2025 Apr 22;10(6):101767. doi: 10.1016/j.adro.2025.101767. eCollection 2025 Jun.
2
Comparison of Two Modern Survival Prediction Tools, SORG-MLA and METSSS, in Patients With Symptomatic Long-bone Metastases Who Underwent Local Treatment With Surgery Followed by Radiotherapy and With Radiotherapy Alone.两种现代生存预测工具 SORG-MLA 和 METSSS 在接受手术联合放疗和单纯放疗治疗有症状长骨转移患者中的比较。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Dec 1;482(12):2193-2208. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003185. Epub 2024 Jul 23.
3
Nutritional interventions for survivors of childhood cancer.儿童癌症幸存者的营养干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Aug 22;2016(8):CD009678. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009678.pub2.
4
Behavioral interventions to reduce risk for sexual transmission of HIV among men who have sex with men.降低男男性行为者中艾滋病毒性传播风险的行为干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 Jul 16(3):CD001230. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001230.pub2.
5
Interventions in outside-school hours childcare settings for promoting physical activity amongst schoolchildren aged 4 to 12 years.校外儿童保育环境中促进 4 至 12 岁学童身体活动的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Sep 27;9(9):CD013380. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013380.pub2.
6
Antidepressants for pain management in adults with chronic pain: a network meta-analysis.抗抑郁药治疗成人慢性疼痛的疼痛管理:一项网络荟萃分析。
Health Technol Assess. 2024 Oct;28(62):1-155. doi: 10.3310/MKRT2948.
7
Signs and symptoms to determine if a patient presenting in primary care or hospital outpatient settings has COVID-19.在基层医疗机构或医院门诊环境中,如果患者出现以下症状和体征,可判断其是否患有 COVID-19。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 May 20;5(5):CD013665. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013665.pub3.
8
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.系统性药理学治疗慢性斑块状银屑病:网络荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Apr 19;4(4):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub4.
9
Clinical symptoms, signs and tests for identification of impending and current water-loss dehydration in older people.老年人即将发生和当前失水脱水的识别的临床症状、体征及检查
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Apr 30;2015(4):CD009647. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009647.pub2.
10
The Black Book of Psychotropic Dosing and Monitoring.《精神药物剂量与监测黑皮书》
Psychopharmacol Bull. 2024 Jul 8;54(3):8-59.

本文引用的文献

1
A global view of the aspiring physician-scientist.有志于成为医师科学家的全球视野。
Elife. 2022 Sep 13;11:e79738. doi: 10.7554/eLife.79738.
2
Demystifying radiation oncology clinical trial concerns for protocol scientific review and institutional review board committee members.揭开放射肿瘤学临床试验对于方案科学审查人员及机构审查委员会成员的相关问题的神秘面纱。
Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2022 Mar 19;27:100911. doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2022.100911. eCollection 2022 Jun.
3
Overcoming Barriers to Radiation Oncology Access in Low-Resource Settings in the United States.
克服美国资源匮乏地区放射肿瘤治疗可及性的障碍。
Adv Radiat Oncol. 2021 Sep 10;6(6):100802. doi: 10.1016/j.adro.2021.100802. eCollection 2021 Nov-Dec.
4
The Role of the Global Coalition for Radiotherapy in Political Advocacy for Radiation Therapy as a Cost-Effective and Underfunded Modality Around the World.全球放射治疗联盟在将放射治疗作为一种具有成本效益但资金不足的全球治疗方式进行政治宣传方面的作用。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2021 Sep 1;111(1):23-26. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2021.04.010.
5
The national MD-PhD program outcomes study: Relationships between medical specialty, training duration, research effort, and career paths.国家医学博士项目成果研究:医学专业、培训时长、研究投入与职业道路的关系。
JCI Insight. 2019 Oct 3;4(19):133009. doi: 10.1172/jci.insight.133009.
6
Analysis of the 2017 American Society for Radiation Oncology (ASTRO) Research Portfolio.分析 2017 年美国放射肿瘤学会(ASTRO)研究组合。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2019 Feb 1;103(2):297-304. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2018.07.2056.
7
Funding for radiation research: past, present and future.辐射研究的资金投入:过去、现在和未来。
Int J Radiat Biol. 2019 Jul;95(7):816-840. doi: 10.1080/09553002.2018.1558303. Epub 2019 Feb 15.
8
Characteristics of Radiotherapy Trials Compared With Other Oncological Clinical Trials in the Past 10 Years.过去 10 年放疗试验与其他肿瘤临床试验的特点比较。
JAMA Oncol. 2018 Aug 1;4(8):1073-1079. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2018.0887.
9
Research funding for radiation oncology: an unfortunately small sliver of an inadequate pie.放射肿瘤学的研究资金:在一块本就不足的蛋糕中所占比例小得可怜。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2013 Jun 1;86(2):216-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2013.02.028.
10
National Institutes of Health funding in radiation oncology: a snapshot.国立卫生研究院在放射肿瘤学方面的资助:一个快照。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2013 Jun 1;86(2):234-40. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2013.01.030. Epub 2013 Mar 21.