Suppr超能文献

重新定义并解决数字鸿沟与排斥问题以改善医疗保健:超越接入范畴,纳入可得性、充分性、可接受性和可负担性。

Redefining and solving the digital divide and exclusion to improve healthcare: going beyond access to include availability, adequacy, acceptability, and affordability.

作者信息

Hollimon Laronda A, Taylor Kayla V, Fiegenbaum Rachel, Carrasco Mary, Garchitorena Gomez Laurent, Chung Debbie, Seixas Azizi A

机构信息

The Media and Innovation Lab, Department of Informatics and Health Data Sciences, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, United States.

Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Health Sciences, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, United States.

出版信息

Front Digit Health. 2025 Apr 22;7:1508686. doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2025.1508686. eCollection 2025.

Abstract

The digital divide in the United States extends beyond the traditional definition of access, which focuses solely on physical infrastructure like broadband networks and connectivity points. This narrow framing has resulted in policies that fail to address the full spectrum of barriers to digital inclusion. To bridge this gap, we propose the Rhizomatic Digital Ecosystem Framework, which emphasizes five interdependent components: access, availability, adequacy, acceptability and affordability. Access highlights the need for physical infrastructure, with programs like the Broadband Equity, Access, and Deployment (BEAD) Program expanding connectivity to underserved areas. Availability ensures the presence of reliable internet infrastructure to meet community needs, with targeted policies like satellite-based solutions addressing challenges in rural and Indigenous areas. Availability policies should focus on federal funding programs like BEAD and the Tribal Broadband Connectivity Program, incentivizing Internet service Providers (ISP) to expand into underserved areas, and leveraging satellite technologies to address infrastructure gaps. Novel policies to address the digital divide include community-owned broadband networks, dynamic spectrum sharing, and blockchain-powered micro-networks to improve availability in underserved areas. Adequacy examines whether internet services meet modern demands, such as telehealth and online education, emphasizing the need for minimum speed standards and performance improvements. Adequacy policies should include enforcing FCC speed standards with regular audits, requiring ISPs to upgrade outdated infrastructure, and providing government grants to improve broadband quality in communities. For adequacy, solutions like AI-driven broadband performance monitoring, funding edge computing in remote regions, and treating broadband as a public utility can enhance internet speed and quality Acceptability tackles cultural and social barriers, including digital literacy gaps, language differences, and technophobia, which can be addressed through localized literacy programs and inclusive design practices. Acceptability policies should prioritize national digital literacy campaigns for underserved groups, mandate inclusive design and accessibility standards, and offer multilingual and culturally relevant resources for digital tools. Affordability addresses financial barriers, as many low-income households struggle to afford monthly internet fees and devices, even with subsidies such as the Affordable Connectivity Program (ACP). To improve acceptability, innovative approaches like universal digital literacy vouchers, gamified education platforms, and mandatory accessibility standards for all digital technologies can ensure equitable and inclusive digital participation. Together, these five dimensions provide a nuanced and actionable framework for crafting effective, interconnected policies and solutions. By addressing each dimension through the lens of the Rhizomatic Digital Ecosystem Framework, policymakers can develop holistic strategies to eliminate the digital divide and foster equitable digital inclusion across all communities.

摘要

美国的数字鸿沟超出了传统的接入定义,传统定义仅关注诸如宽带网络和连接点等物理基础设施。这种狭隘的框架导致政策未能解决数字包容的全方位障碍。为了弥合这一差距,我们提出了根茎状数字生态系统框架,该框架强调五个相互依存的组成部分:接入、可用性、充分性、可接受性和可承受性。接入突出了对物理基础设施的需求,像宽带公平、接入和部署(BEAD)计划这样的项目正在将连接扩展到服务不足的地区。可用性确保存在可靠的互联网基础设施以满足社区需求,像基于卫星的解决方案这样的针对性政策正在应对农村和原住民地区的挑战。可用性政策应关注像BEAD和部落宽带连接计划这样的联邦资助项目,激励互联网服务提供商(ISP)扩展到服务不足的地区,并利用卫星技术来弥补基础设施差距。解决数字鸿沟的新政策包括社区拥有的宽带网络、动态频谱共享以及区块链驱动的微型网络,以提高服务不足地区的可用性。充分性考察互联网服务是否满足现代需求,如远程医疗和在线教育,强调需要有最低速度标准并改善性能。充分性政策应包括通过定期审计来执行联邦通信委员会的速度标准,要求ISP升级过时的基础设施,并提供政府拨款以改善社区的宽带质量。对于充分性而言,像人工智能驱动的宽带性能监测、为偏远地区的边缘计算提供资金以及将宽带视为公共事业这样的解决方案可以提高互联网速度和质量。可接受性解决文化和社会障碍,包括数字素养差距、语言差异和技术恐惧,这可以通过本地化的素养项目和包容性设计实践来解决。可接受性政策应优先为服务不足群体开展全国性数字素养运动,强制实施包容性设计和无障碍标准,并为数字工具提供多语言和与文化相关的资源。可承受性解决财务障碍,因为许多低收入家庭即使有诸如负担得起的连接计划(ACP)这样的补贴,仍难以负担每月的互联网费用和设备。为了提高可接受性,像通用数字素养代金券、游戏化教育平台以及所有数字技术的强制性无障碍标准这样的创新方法可以确保公平和包容性的数字参与。这五个维度共同为制定有效、相互关联的政策和解决方案提供了一个细致入微且可操作的框架。通过从根茎状数字生态系统框架的角度解决每个维度的问题,政策制定者可以制定全面的战略来消除数字鸿沟,并在所有社区促进公平的数字包容。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8c21/12052546/25d3c9c35f1e/fdgth-07-1508686-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验