Modini Ella L, Trood Michael D, Fullam Rachael, Macfarlane Stephen R, Nixon Margaret
Centre for Forensic Behavioural Science, Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, Australia.
Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
J Correct Health Care. 2025 Jun;31(3):176-183. doi: 10.1089/jchc.24.08.0066. Epub 2025 May 7.
There are many reasons why people experiencing incarceration may be predisposed to developing dementia. Dementia assessment in prisons is challenging. This study assessed the Addenbrooke's Cognitive Examination 3rd Edition (ACE-III) and the Mini Addenbrooke's Cognitive Examination (M-ACE) as potential tools for use in incarcerated populations, with a view to detecting suspected dementia. The ACE-III was administered to 114 males more than 50 years of age without a diagnosis of dementia across three prison sites in Victoria, Australia, in 2022. A psychogeriatrician reviewed data for atypical response patterns to determine whether individuals' profiles were suggestive of dementia. The M-ACE was scored retrospectively from the ACE-III. Scores were compared with the psychogeriatrician's review to determine concordance rates. Both tools acceptably discriminated males who indicated dementia from those without (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.77, [0.65, 0.98]; AUC = 0.77, [0.60, 0.93], respectively). Both tools produced high negative predictive values (0.96 and 0.97). Both the ACE-III and M-ACE demonstrated utility for use in this cohort. The M-ACE may be an useful tool for screening out individuals who do not have dementia, while the ACE-III provides a comprehensive cognitive profile as a basis to assess for dementia.
经历监禁的人易患痴呆症的原因有很多。监狱中的痴呆症评估具有挑战性。本研究评估了剑桥认知评估量表第三版(ACE-III)和简易剑桥认知评估量表(M-ACE)作为用于被监禁人群的潜在工具,以期检测疑似痴呆症。2022年,在澳大利亚维多利亚州的三个监狱地点,对114名年龄超过50岁且未被诊断为痴呆症的男性进行了ACE-III测试。一名老年精神科医生审查了非典型反应模式的数据,以确定个人的情况是否提示患有痴呆症。M-ACE是根据ACE-III的结果进行回顾性评分的。将分数与老年精神科医生的审查结果进行比较,以确定一致率。两种工具都能合理地区分表明患有痴呆症的男性和未患痴呆症的男性(曲线下面积[AUC]分别为 = 0.77,[0.65, 0.98];AUC = 0.77,[0.60, 0.93])。两种工具都产生了较高的阴性预测值(0.96和0.97)。ACE-III和M-ACE在该队列中均显示出实用性。M-ACE可能是筛选出未患痴呆症个体的有用工具,而ACE-III则提供了全面的认知概况,作为评估痴呆症的基础。