• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

以终为始:来自2024年美国国立神经疾病和中风研究所创伤性脑损伤分类与命名研讨会“知识转化实践工作组”的优化新型创伤性脑损伤分类实施的建议。

Starting with the End in Mind: Recommendations to Optimize Implementation of a Novel TBI Classification from the 2024 NINDS TBI Classification and Nomenclature Workshop's Knowledge to Practice Working Group.

作者信息

Bragge Peter, McNett Molly, Bayley Mark, Dobbins Maureen, Nakase-Richardson Risa, Peek-Asa Corinne, Turgeon Alexis F, Awwad Hibah, Dams-O'Connor Kristen, Doperalski Adele, Maas Andrew, McCrea Mike, Umoh Nsini, Manley Geoff

机构信息

Monash Sustainable Development Institute and Behaviour Works Australia, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.

College of Nursing, Helene Fuld Health Trust National Institute for Evidence-based Practice in Nursing & Healthcare, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA.

出版信息

J Neurotrauma. 2025 Jul;42(13-14):1096-1108. doi: 10.1089/neu.2024.0576. Epub 2025 May 7.

DOI:10.1089/neu.2024.0576
PMID:40331687
Abstract

The Knowledge to Practice Working Group (K2P WG) was one of six expert groups convened in early 2023 to plan the 2024 National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke Traumatic brain injury (TBI) Classification and Nomenclature Workshop. Recognizing that implementation of revised classification systems is essential to achieve intended impact, the K2P WG's key aims were to foster shared understanding of knowledge translation (KT), build capacity for implementation of a revised TBI classification system, identify and prioritize KT actions, implementation steps and audiences; and make recommendations to advance implementation. The cornerstone of this work was a focused survey to identify "who needs to do what differently," while prioritizing potential implementation actions. Survey findings, dialogue with other working groups, stakeholder discussions, and public feedback were also utilized to support implementation of the revised Clinical, Biomarker, Imaging-Modifiers and retrospective TBI classification system. Forty researchers across five working groups responded to the survey (Response Rate = 59.7%). Fifty-two unique implementation actions were identified. The top 15 priorities across the five working groups comprised six pertaining to clinical practice (e.g., change Glasgow Coma Scale [GCS] assessment); seven focusing on research (e.g., develop tools for measuring psychological and environmental factors); and one each on lived experience (simplified language for patients and families) and other settings (insurance company support for biomarker testing). Twenty-seven stakeholder groups and 18 target settings were identified as being most impacted by the revised classification system. Key recommendations included: develop guidelines based on systematic reviews, clearly explain the rationale for the change, develop implementation toolkits with input from all stakeholders, and embed the new classification in a learning health system database to facilitate implementation strategies based on audits, feedback, and cost-effectiveness analyses.

摘要

知识转化实践工作组(K2P WG)是2023年初召集的六个专家小组之一,旨在规划2024年美国国立神经疾病和中风研究所创伤性脑损伤(TBI)分类与命名研讨会。认识到实施修订后的分类系统对于实现预期影响至关重要,K2P WG的主要目标是促进对知识转化(KT)的共同理解,培养实施修订后的TBI分类系统的能力,确定KT行动、实施步骤和受众的优先级;并提出推进实施的建议。这项工作的基石是一项重点调查,以确定“谁需要采取不同的行动”,同时对潜在的实施行动进行优先级排序。调查结果、与其他工作组的对话、利益相关者讨论以及公众反馈也被用于支持修订后的临床、生物标志物、影像修饰符和回顾性TBI分类系统的实施。五个工作组的40名研究人员对调查做出了回应(回应率=59.7%)。确定了52项独特的实施行动。五个工作组的前15项优先事项包括六项与临床实践相关(例如,改变格拉斯哥昏迷量表[GCS]评估);七项侧重于研究(例如,开发测量心理和环境因素的工具);以及一项关于生活经历(为患者和家庭简化语言)和其他环境(保险公司对生物标志物检测的支持)。27个利益相关者群体和18个目标环境被确定为受修订后的分类系统影响最大的群体。主要建议包括:基于系统评价制定指南,清楚解释变更的理由,在所有利益相关者的参与下开发实施工具包,并将新分类纳入学习健康系统数据库,以促进基于审核、反馈和成本效益分析的实施策略。

相似文献

1
Starting with the End in Mind: Recommendations to Optimize Implementation of a Novel TBI Classification from the 2024 NINDS TBI Classification and Nomenclature Workshop's Knowledge to Practice Working Group.以终为始:来自2024年美国国立神经疾病和中风研究所创伤性脑损伤分类与命名研讨会“知识转化实践工作组”的优化新型创伤性脑损伤分类实施的建议。
J Neurotrauma. 2025 Jul;42(13-14):1096-1108. doi: 10.1089/neu.2024.0576. Epub 2025 May 7.
2
Clinical Assessment on Days 1-14 for the Characterization of Traumatic Brain Injury: Recommendations from the 2024 NINDS Traumatic Brain Injury Classification and Nomenclature Initiative Clinical/Symptoms Working Group.创伤性脑损伤特征的第1至14天临床评估:2024年美国国立神经疾病和中风研究所创伤性脑损伤分类与命名倡议临床/症状工作组的建议
J Neurotrauma. 2025 Jul;42(13-14):1038-1055. doi: 10.1089/neu.2024.0577. Epub 2025 May 20.
3
Neuroimaging Characterization of Acute Traumatic Brain Injury with Focus on Frontline Clinicians: Recommendations from the 2024 National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke Traumatic Brain Injury Classification and Nomenclature Initiative Imaging Working Group.聚焦一线临床医生的急性创伤性脑损伤的神经影像学特征:2024年美国国立神经疾病和中风研究所创伤性脑损伤分类与命名倡议影像工作组的建议
J Neurotrauma. 2025 Jul;42(13-14):1056-1064. doi: 10.1089/neu.2025.0079. Epub 2025 May 20.
4
Retrospective Identification and Characterization of Traumatic Brain Injury-Recommendations from the 2024 National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke Traumatic Brain Injury Classification and Nomenclature Initiative Retrospective Classification Working Group.创伤性脑损伤的回顾性识别与特征描述——2024年美国国立神经疾病和中风研究所创伤性脑损伤分类与命名倡议回顾性分类工作组的建议
J Neurotrauma. 2025 Jul;42(13-14):1086-1095. doi: 10.1089/neu.2024.0590. Epub 2025 May 20.
5
Toward More Holistic Early Traumatic Brain Injury Evaluation and Care: Recommendations from the 2024 National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke Traumatic Brain Injury Classification and Nomenclature Initiative Psychosocial and Environmental Modifiers Working Group.迈向更全面的早期创伤性脑损伤评估与护理:2024年美国国立神经疾病和中风研究所创伤性脑损伤分类与命名倡议心理社会和环境修饰因素工作组的建议
J Neurotrauma. 2025 Jul;42(13-14):1023-1037. doi: 10.1089/neu.2024.0569. Epub 2025 Jun 4.
6
Blood-Based Biomarkers for Improved Characterization of Traumatic Brain Injury: Recommendations from the 2024 National Institute for Neurological Disorders and Stroke Traumatic Brain Injury Classification and Nomenclature Initiative Blood-Based Biomarkers Working Group.用于改善创伤性脑损伤特征描述的血液生物标志物:2024年美国国立神经疾病和中风研究所创伤性脑损伤分类与命名倡议血液生物标志物工作组的建议
J Neurotrauma. 2025 Jul;42(13-14):1065-1085. doi: 10.1089/neu.2024.0581. Epub 2025 May 20.
7
A new characterisation of acute traumatic brain injury: the NIH-NINDS TBI Classification and Nomenclature Initiative.急性创伤性脑损伤的一种新特征描述:美国国立卫生研究院-美国国立神经疾病与中风研究所创伤性脑损伤分类与命名计划。
Lancet Neurol. 2025 Jun;24(6):512-523. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(25)00154-1.
8
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.医疗专业人员在急症医院环境中团队合作教育的经验:对定性文献的系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.
9
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险
10
How do speech-language pathologists assess and treat spoken discourse after TBI? A survey of clinical practice.言语-语言病理学家如何评估和治疗 TBI 后的口语语篇?临床实践调查。
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2024 Mar-Apr;59(2):591-607. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12784. Epub 2022 Sep 18.