• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

血液系统恶性肿瘤患者姑息治疗整合中的挑战:一项前瞻性队列研究中意外问题的分析

Challenges in the integration of palliative care for patients with hematologic malignancies: an analysis of the surprise question in a prospective cohort study.

作者信息

Silva Alini Maria Orathes Ponte, Miranda Diego Lopes Paim, Ferreira David Pereira, Campos Camilla Correia de Araujo Pereira, Crusoé Edvan de Queiroz, Gomes Felipe Feistauer, Favano Thiago, Salvino Marco Aurélio

机构信息

Postgraduate Program in Medicine and Heath, Professor Edgard Santos University Hospital, Medical School, Universidade Federal da Bahia (UFBA), Salvador (BA), Brazil.

Medical School, Universidade Federal da Bahia (UFBA), Salvador (BA), Brazil.

出版信息

Sao Paulo Med J. 2025 May 2;143(3):e2024263. doi: 10.1590/1516-3180.2024.0263.29012025. eCollection 2025.

DOI:10.1590/1516-3180.2024.0263.29012025
PMID:40332282
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12052263/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Surprise Question (SQ), "Would I be surprised if this patient were to die in the next 12 months?", identifies patients at high risk of death who might benefit from palliative care (PC). However, little is known about its application in oncohematology.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the performance of the SQ among inpatients with hematologic malignancies.

DESIGN AND SETTING

A prospective cohort study was conducted between September and December 2021, including patients admitted to the Hematology Ward of the University Hospital in Salvador, Brazil.

METHODS

Physicians answered the SQ (not surprised (SQ+) or surprised (SQ-)). Mortality data were assessed after one year.

RESULTS

Eighty-one patients were included (56% SQ+ and 44% SQ-). At study closure, 36 patients (44%) had died. Median survival was 10.8 months (95%CI = 9.7-11.8) for SQ- and 5.6 months (95%CI = 4.1-7.1) for SQ+. Sensitivity was 86.1%, specificity 68.9%, positive predictive value 68.8%, negative predictive value 86.1%, and accuracy 76.5%. At the time of the interview, only 15 (18.5%) patients had consulted a PC specialist. By the study's end, 48% had been referred to PC. These patients had poorer performance status (82% vs. 40%, P < 0.001) and more advance care planning records (87% vs. 14%, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the prognostic uncertainty of hematologic malignancies, the SQ effectively estimates mortality and serves as a valuable tool for early PC integration in oncohematology.

摘要

背景

“意外问题”(SQ),即“如果该患者在未来12个月内死亡,我会感到意外吗?”,可识别出可能从姑息治疗(PC)中获益的高死亡风险患者。然而,关于其在血液肿瘤学中的应用知之甚少。

目的

评估“意外问题”在血液系统恶性肿瘤住院患者中的表现。

设计与背景

2021年9月至12月进行了一项前瞻性队列研究,纳入巴西萨尔瓦多大学医院血液科病房的患者。

方法

医生回答“意外问题”(不意外(SQ+)或意外(SQ-))。一年后评估死亡率数据。

结果

纳入81例患者(56%为SQ+,44%为SQ-)。研究结束时,36例患者(44%)死亡。SQ-组的中位生存期为10.8个月(95%CI = 9.7 - 11.8),SQ+组为5.6个月(95%CI = 4.1 - 7.1)。敏感性为86.1%,特异性为68.9%,阳性预测值为68.8%,阴性预测值为86.1%,准确性为76.5%。在访谈时,只有15例(18.5%)患者咨询过姑息治疗专科医生。到研究结束时,48%的患者已被转诊至姑息治疗。这些患者的功能状态较差(82%对40%,P < 0.001),且有更多的预先护理计划记录(87%对14%,P < 0.001)。

结论

尽管血液系统恶性肿瘤的预后存在不确定性,但“意外问题”能有效估计死亡率,是血液肿瘤学中早期整合姑息治疗的有价值工具。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3ded/12052263/56feae649dde/1806-9460-spmj-143-3-e2024263-gf01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3ded/12052263/56feae649dde/1806-9460-spmj-143-3-e2024263-gf01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3ded/12052263/56feae649dde/1806-9460-spmj-143-3-e2024263-gf01.jpg

相似文献

1
Challenges in the integration of palliative care for patients with hematologic malignancies: an analysis of the surprise question in a prospective cohort study.血液系统恶性肿瘤患者姑息治疗整合中的挑战:一项前瞻性队列研究中意外问题的分析
Sao Paulo Med J. 2025 May 2;143(3):e2024263. doi: 10.1590/1516-3180.2024.0263.29012025. eCollection 2025.
2
Usability of the surprise question by nurses to identify 12-month mortality in hospitalized older patients: A prospective cohort study.护士使用惊讶问题识别住院老年患者 12 个月死亡率的可用性:一项前瞻性队列研究。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2020 Sep;109:103609. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2020.103609. Epub 2020 May 29.
3
Surprise Question and Performance Status Indicate Urgency of Palliative Care Needs in Patients with Advanced Cancer at the Emergency Department: An Observational Cohort Study.在急诊科有晚期癌症的患者中,意外问题和表现状态提示了舒缓治疗需求的紧迫性:一项观察性队列研究。
J Palliat Med. 2020 Jun;23(6):801-808. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2019.0413. Epub 2019 Dec 26.
4
The Surprise Question Can Be Used to Identify Heart Failure Patients in the Emergency Department Who Would Benefit From Palliative Care.“惊讶问题”可用于识别急诊科中需要姑息治疗的心力衰竭患者。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2019 May;57(5):944-951. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2019.02.007. Epub 2019 Feb 16.
5
How Well Does the Surprise Question Predict 1-year Mortality for Patients Admitted with COPD?“惊讶问题”预测 COPD 患者 1 年死亡率的效果如何?
J Gen Intern Med. 2021 Sep;36(9):2656-2662. doi: 10.1007/s11606-020-06512-8. Epub 2021 Jan 6.
6
Palliative Care in Advanced Alzheimer's Disease Dementia: Evaluation of the Answers Given by Caregivers and Physicians to the Accuracy of Surprise Question, as a Prognostic Tool.晚期阿尔茨海默病痴呆症的姑息治疗:评估护理人员和医生对意外问题准确性的回答,作为一种预后工具。
Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2023 Jun;40(6):624-632. doi: 10.1177/10499091221121328. Epub 2022 Aug 12.
7
Utility of the NECPAL CCOMS-ICO tool and the Surprise Question as screening tools for early palliative care and to predict mortality in patients with advanced chronic conditions: A cohort study.NECPAL CCOMS-ICO 工具和意外问题作为早期姑息治疗的筛选工具以及预测晚期慢性疾病患者死亡率的效用:一项队列研究。
Palliat Med. 2017 Sep;31(8):754-763. doi: 10.1177/0269216316676647. Epub 2016 Nov 4.
8
The prognostic value of the 12-, 6-, 3- and 1-month 'Surprise Question' in cancer patients: A prospective cohort study in three hospitals.12 个月、6 个月、3 个月和 1 个月“意外问题”对癌症患者预后的预测价值:三所医院的前瞻性队列研究。
Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2022 Nov;31(6):e13551. doi: 10.1111/ecc.13551. Epub 2022 Jan 26.
9
COPD patients in need of palliative care: Identification after hospitalization through the surprise question.需要姑息治疗的 COPD 患者:通过“惊讶问题”在住院后进行识别。
Chron Respir Dis. 2019 Jan-Dec;16:1479972318796219. doi: 10.1177/1479972318796219. Epub 2018 Sep 16.
10
Using the Surprise Question To Identify Those with Unmet Palliative Care Needs in Emergency and Inpatient Settings: What Do Clinicians Think?在急诊和住院环境中使用惊喜问题识别未满足的姑息治疗需求者:临床医生怎么看?
J Palliat Med. 2017 Jul;20(7):729-735. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2016.0403. Epub 2017 Feb 16.

本文引用的文献

1
Variability in the perception of palliative care and end-of-life care among hematology professionals from the same reference center in Bahia, Brazil: A descriptive cross-sectional study.巴西巴伊亚州同一参考中心血液学专业人员对姑息治疗和临终关怀认知的变异性:描述性横断面研究。
Sao Paulo Med J. 2024 Feb 23;142(4):e2023225. doi: 10.1590/1516-3180.2023.0255.R1.29112023. eCollection 2024.
2
Position statement of ANCP and SBGG on shared decision-making in palliative care.ANCP和SBGG关于姑息治疗中共同决策的立场声明。
Cad Saude Publica. 2022 Sep 23;38(9):e00130022. doi: 10.1590/0102-311XPT130022. eCollection 2022.
3
Palliative care of patients with haematological malignancies: strategies to overcome difficulties via integrated care.
血液恶性肿瘤患者的姑息治疗:通过综合护理克服困难的策略。
Lancet Healthy Longev. 2021 Nov;2(11):e746-e753. doi: 10.1016/S2666-7568(21)00213-0. Epub 2021 Oct 5.
4
The utility of the surprise question: A useful tool for identifying patients nearing the last phase of life? A systematic review and meta-analysis.“惊讶问题”的实用性:识别生命末期患者的有用工具?系统评价和荟萃分析。
Palliat Med. 2022 Jul;36(7):1023-1046. doi: 10.1177/02692163221099116.
5
Early integration of palliative care for patients with haematological malignancies.血液恶性肿瘤患者的姑息治疗的早期介入。
Br J Haematol. 2022 Oct;199(1):14-30. doi: 10.1111/bjh.18286. Epub 2022 Jun 7.
6
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status #434.东部肿瘤协作组体能状态#434。
J Palliat Med. 2022 Mar;25(3):508-510. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2021.0599.
7
Goal of a "Good Death" in End-of-Life Care for Patients with Hematologic Malignancies-Are We Close?终末期血液恶性肿瘤患者生存照护中“善终”的目标:我们是否接近?
Curr Hematol Malig Rep. 2021 Apr;16(2):117-125. doi: 10.1007/s11899-021-00629-1. Epub 2021 Apr 16.
8
Early palliative care versus standard care in haematologic cancer patients at their last active treatment: study protocol of a feasibility trial.早期姑息治疗与血液恶性肿瘤患者最后一次积极治疗时的标准治疗相比:一项可行性试验的研究方案。
BMC Palliat Care. 2020 Apr 22;19(1):53. doi: 10.1186/s12904-020-00561-w.
9
Palliative and End-of-Life Care for Patients With Hematologic Malignancies.血液系统恶性肿瘤患者的姑息治疗和终末期关怀。
J Clin Oncol. 2020 Mar 20;38(9):944-953. doi: 10.1200/JCO.18.02386. Epub 2020 Feb 5.
10
Models of Palliative Care Delivery for Patients With Cancer.癌症患者姑息治疗的提供模式。
J Clin Oncol. 2020 Mar 20;38(9):852-865. doi: 10.1200/JCO.18.02123. Epub 2020 Feb 5.