Pinho Ana Paula Vilhena Beckman, Ferreira Fernando, Fuck Jeferson Jacó, de Oliveira Jefferson Pinto, Dias Ricardo Augusto, Grisi-Filho José Henrique Hidebrand, Heinemann Marcos Bryan, Telles Evelise Oliveira, Amaku Marcos, Ferreira Neto José Soares
Agência de Defesa Agropecuária do Estado do Pará (ADEPARÁ), Belém, PA, Brasil.
Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia, Universidade de São Paulo, av. Prof. Dr. Orlando Marques de Paiva, 87 - CEP 05508-270, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Vet Res Commun. 2025 May 7;49(4):192. doi: 10.1007/s11259-025-10759-z.
Considering that control strategies for Equine Infectious Anemia, based on the serological diagnosis of equids and the removal of positive animals, may not be optimal for developing countries with an absolute predominance of grade working animals, this study aimed to address this issue based on the epidemiological situation of the disease in Pará, a state in the Brazilian Amazon. Pará was divided into five regions, and within each region a pre-established number of farms were randomly selected. Within each farm, a pre-set number of animals were randomly selected and submitted to Agar Gel Immunodiffusion test. A questionnaire was administered on the farms to identify risk factors for the disease. In total, 2,718 equids (horses, mules and donkeys) from 654 farms were tested. The prevalence at farms and animal level in the state was 34.5% (95% CI: 30.8-38.4) and 15.8% (95% CI: 14.4-17.4), with significant regional differences. Equids from farms with 11 or more equids (OR = 2.32 [95% CI: 1.38-3.92]) and those that shared water sources with other farms (OR = 1.76 [95% CI: 1.26-2.46]) were more likely to be infected. The average sensitivity of the surveillance system for detecting infected farms ranged from 0.92 to 1.14%, which is insufficient to disrupt the endemic balance of the disease in the state, demanding a reassessment. The key elements of this process, as well as the potential strategies to be implemented, have been discussed in the context of Pará and can be extended to regions with similar characteristics.
考虑到基于马属动物血清学诊断和清除阳性动物的马传染性贫血控制策略,对于以役用动物为主的发展中国家可能并非最佳选择,本研究旨在根据巴西亚马逊州帕拉州该疾病的流行病学情况来解决这一问题。帕拉州被划分为五个区域,在每个区域内随机选择预先确定数量的农场。在每个农场中,随机选择预先设定数量的动物并进行琼脂凝胶免疫扩散试验。在农场发放问卷以确定该疾病的风险因素。总共对来自654个农场的2718匹马属动物(马、骡和驴)进行了检测。该州农场层面和动物层面的患病率分别为34.5%(95%置信区间:30.8 - 38.4)和15.8%(95%置信区间:14.4 - 17.4),存在显著的区域差异。来自拥有11匹或更多马属动物的农场的动物(比值比 = 2.32 [95%置信区间:1.38 - 3.92])以及与其他农场共用水源的动物(比值比 = 1.76 [95%置信区间:1.26 - 2.46])更易感染。监测系统检测受感染农场的平均灵敏度在0.92%至1.14%之间,不足以打破该州疾病的地方流行平衡,需要重新评估。这一过程的关键要素以及拟实施的潜在策略已在帕拉州的背景下进行了讨论,并且可以推广到具有相似特征的地区。