Suppr超能文献

腹腔镜与机器人辅助转换减肥手术的适应症及结果:一项MBSAQIP研究

Indications and Outcomes of Laparoscopic Versus Robotic Conversional Bariatric Surgery: An MBSAQIP Study.

作者信息

Barajas-Gamboa Juan S, Khan Mohammed Sakib Ihsan, Zhan Kevin, Shin Thomas H, Mocanu Valentin, Romero-Velez Gustavo, Strong Andrew T, Navarrete Salvador, Abril Carlos, Pantoja Juan Pablo, Guerron A Daniel, Rodriguez John, Corcelles Ricard, Kroh Matthew, Dang Jerry T

机构信息

Cleveland Clinic Abu Dhabi, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates.

College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Khalifa University, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates.

出版信息

Obes Surg. 2025 May 7. doi: 10.1007/s11695-025-07886-6.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Conversional bariatric surgeries (CBS) are performed using laparoscopic and robotic techniques, but comprehensive data comparing these approaches remains scarce.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the indications and outcomes of laparoscopic versus robotic CBS.

METHODS

The MBSAQIP database was retrospectively analyzed from 2020 to 2022, comparing laparoscopic and robotic CBS. Primary outcomes were 30-day serious complications and mortality.

RESULTS

Of 72,189 CBS procedures, 75.4% were laparoscopic and 24.6% robotic. Mean age and BMI were similar between groups. The most common indications for both approaches were reflux, weight regain, and inadequate weight loss, with reflux being more prevalent in robotic CBS (38.3% vs 33.2%). Sleeve-to-bypass was the most common procedure in both groups (35.8% laparoscopic, 44.2% robotic). Robotic CBS had longer mean operative times (165.4 vs 121.7 min, p < 0.001) and slightly longer hospital stays (1.7 vs 1.6 days, p < 0.001). The rate of serious complications was slightly higher for robotic CBS, though not statistically significant (6.5% vs 6.1%, p = 0.08). Robotic CBS had higher rates of leak (0.9% vs 0.7%, p = 0.071), reoperation (2.8% vs 2.6%, p = 0.138), and readmission (6.7% vs 5.4%, p < 0.001). Mortality rates were similar (0.1% for both, p = 0.942).

CONCLUSIONS

Both laparoscopic and robotic CBS show similar safety profiles with comparable mortality rates. However, robotic CBS was associated with longer operative times, slightly longer hospital stays, and higher readmission rates. These findings suggest that the choice between approaches should consider individual patient factors and institutional expertise.

摘要

背景

转换性减肥手术(CBS)采用腹腔镜和机器人技术进行,但比较这些方法的全面数据仍然稀缺。

目的

比较腹腔镜与机器人CBS的适应症和结局。

方法

对2020年至2022年的MBSAQIP数据库进行回顾性分析,比较腹腔镜和机器人CBS。主要结局为30天严重并发症和死亡率。

结果

在72189例CBS手术中,75.4%为腹腔镜手术,24.6%为机器人手术。两组的平均年龄和体重指数相似。两种方法最常见的适应症是反流、体重反弹和体重减轻不足,反流在机器人CBS中更为普遍(38.3%对33.2%)。袖状胃转旁路手术是两组中最常见的手术(腹腔镜手术为35.8%,机器人手术为44.2%)。机器人CBS的平均手术时间更长(165.4分钟对121.7分钟,p<0.001),住院时间略长(1.7天对1.6天,p<0.001)。机器人CBS的严重并发症发生率略高,尽管无统计学意义(6.5%对6.1%,p=0.08)。机器人CBS的渗漏率(0.9%对0.7%,p=0.071)、再次手术率(2.8%对2.6%,p=0.138)和再入院率(6.7%对5.4%,p<0.001)更高。死亡率相似(均为0.1%,p=0.942)。

结论

腹腔镜和机器人CBS均显示出相似的安全性,死亡率相当。然而,机器人CBS与更长的手术时间、略长的住院时间和更高的再入院率相关。这些发现表明,两种方法之间的选择应考虑个体患者因素和机构专业知识。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验