Kuppusamy Radhadevi, Jaffar Norhayati, Shahardin Raja Zarina Raja, Pandey Hemlatha, Mânica Scheila
Centre of Forensic and Legal Medicine and Dentistry, University of Dundee, United Kingdom.
Dental Forensic Unit, Department of Oral Medicine and Maxillofacial, Hospital Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
J Forensic Odontostomatol. 2025 Apr 30;43(1):2-10. doi: 10.5281/zenodo.15046145.
In forensics, dental age estimation is crucial, and literature has many methods for estimating dental age. London Atlas of Human Tooth Development and eruption method was developed on British and Bangladeshi populations in 2010, and there are likely to be differences between other populations. Malaysian children have not yet been extensively tested for the method's applicability despite its universal acceptance and reliability. This research aimed to test the applicability of The London Atlas of human tooth development and eruption in children of the Malaysian population aged 4 to 16.99 years old. The study sample included 523 panoramic radiographs of healthy patients who had attended the Dental Paediatrics Department Hospital Tunku Azizah, Malaysia, between May 2019 and December 2019. The intra- and inter-observer errors were analysed by taking 53 radiographs and evaluating them over 14 days using the interclass correlation and Cohen's Kappa index. A paired t-test was used to compare chronological and estimated age ANOVA F-tests were used to establish if the difference is statistically significant between chronological and estimated age. The range of age estimation fell within a year due to the mean absolute difference of 0.60 years. The mean age for estimated age was 9.31±3.18 for the overall sample, 9.06±3.09 for males, and 9.60±3.27 for females. Paired t-test analysis showed the mean difference between chronological and estimated age of -0.0365 and was not statistically significant (p=0.240). The result also showed no statistically significant difference between the sexes. The difference between the chronological and estimated age was underestimated within minimal range, 0.002 years in males and 0.08 years in females. The London Atlas of human tooth development and eruption showed high accuracy in Malaysian children.
在法医学中,牙齿年龄估计至关重要,文献中有多种估计牙齿年龄的方法。《伦敦人类牙齿发育与萌出图谱》方法于2010年基于英国和孟加拉国人群开发,其他人群可能存在差异。尽管该方法被广泛接受且可靠,但马来西亚儿童尚未对其适用性进行广泛测试。本研究旨在测试《伦敦人类牙齿发育与萌出图谱》在4至16.99岁马来西亚儿童中的适用性。研究样本包括2019年5月至2019年12月期间在马来西亚敦库阿齐扎医院儿科牙科就诊的523名健康患者的全景X光片。通过选取53张X光片并在14天内使用组内相关系数和科恩卡方指数对其进行评估,分析了观察者内和观察者间误差。使用配对t检验比较实际年龄和估计年龄,使用方差分析F检验确定实际年龄和估计年龄之间的差异是否具有统计学意义。由于平均绝对差异为0.60岁,年龄估计范围在一年内。总体样本的估计年龄平均为9.31±3.18岁,男性为9.06±3.09岁,女性为9.60±3.27岁。配对t检验分析显示实际年龄和估计年龄之间的平均差异为-0.0365,无统计学意义(p=0.240)。结果还显示性别之间无统计学意义上的差异。实际年龄和估计年龄之间的差异在最小范围内被低估,男性为0.002岁,女性为0.08岁。《伦敦人类牙齿发育与萌出图谱》在马来西亚儿童中显示出高准确性。