Hitier Marion, Vieira Denis César Leite, Cometti Carole, Durigan Joao Luiz Quagliotti, Babault Nicolas
Sport Science Faculty, Cognition, Action and sensorymotor plasticity (INSERM UMR1093-CAPS), Université Bourgogne Europe, Dijon, France.
Sport Science Faculty, Centre for Performance and Expertise, Université Bourgogne Europe, Dijon, France.
PLoS One. 2025 May 7;20(5):e0322582. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0322582. eCollection 2025.
This study aimed to compare the effects of passive and active warm-up protocols combined with static or neurodynamic stretching on hamstring muscle function. Sixteen individuals (7 men and 9 women) performed three experimental sessions in a randomized order: 1) passive warm-up and static stretching, 2) passive warm-up and neurodynamic stretching, 3) active warm-up and static stretching (control condition). Passive warm- up consisted of 20 minutes in a 45°C hot-room. Active warm-up included 10 minutes of cycling and 10 minutes of sub-maximal contractions. Following warm-up, the participants were engaged in six sets of 30-second stretches, either performed using static or neurodynamic modalities. Testing involved two maximal voluntary contractions (MVC), a passive knee extension test (to evaluate range of motion and hamstring stiffness), and a stand-and-reach test (used for flexibility assessment) conducted before, after warm-up, and after stretching. Electromyography from the biceps femoris and semitendinosus were recorded during MVC. Results revealed a significant time effect for flexibility (p < 0.001). Flexibility enhancements were obtained following active and passive warm-ups and further increased after the stretch, independently of the stretch intervention. The electromyographic activity of the semitendinosus muscle was affected by the time (p = 0.004). It revealed a decrease after stretching as compared to a post-warm-up measurement. No other differences were observed between conditions and time for maximal torque and stiffness indexes. It is concluded that both the active and passive warm-up methods are efficient to increase flexibility. Irrespective of the modality, stretching further improved flexibility without any alteration in muscle viscoelastic properties.
本研究旨在比较被动和主动热身方案结合静态或神经动力学拉伸对腘绳肌功能的影响。16名个体(7名男性和9名女性)以随机顺序进行了三个实验环节:1)被动热身和静态拉伸,2)被动热身和神经动力学拉伸,3)主动热身和静态拉伸(对照条件)。被动热身包括在45°C的热室中进行20分钟。主动热身包括10分钟的骑行和10分钟的次最大收缩。热身之后,参与者进行六组30秒的拉伸,拉伸方式为静态或神经动力学方式。测试包括两次最大自主收缩(MVC)、一次被动膝关节伸展测试(以评估活动范围和腘绳肌僵硬度)以及一次站立前伸测试(用于灵活性评估),分别在热身前、热身之后以及拉伸之后进行。在MVC期间记录股二头肌和半腱肌的肌电图。结果显示灵活性存在显著的时间效应(p < 0.001)。主动和被动热身之后灵活性均得到提高,且在拉伸之后进一步增加,与拉伸干预方式无关。半腱肌的肌电活动受时间影响(p = 0.004)。与热身之后的测量结果相比,拉伸之后其活动降低。在最大扭矩和僵硬度指标方面,各条件与时间之间未观察到其他差异。结论是,主动和被动热身方法均能有效提高灵活性。无论采用何种方式,拉伸均可进一步改善灵活性,且不会改变肌肉的粘弹性特性。