Inoue Takeshi, Masuda Takahiro, Sano Fumiya, Maruyama Hidenori
Department of Psychiatry, Tokyo Medical University, Tokyo, Japan; Department of Psychiatry, Sapporo Hanazono Hospital, Sapporo, Japan.
Department of Medical Science, Sumitomo Pharma Co., Ltd., Osaka, Japan.
J Affect Disord. 2025 Sep 15;385:119348. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2025.05.008. Epub 2025 May 5.
Anxiety comorbidity is common in patients with bipolar disorder and is associated with higher severity and reduced treatment response. The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of lurasidone in patients with bipolar depression who present with or without severe anxiety symptoms.
Data were pooled from 2 bipolar I depression studies of very similar design that randomized patients, double-blind, to 6 weeks of treatment with lurasidone (20-60 mg/day or 80-120 mg/day) versus placebo. Patients were categorized into 2 groups based on their Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAM-A) score at baseline: a "severe" anxiety group (HAM-A ≥ 18) and a "non-severe" anxiety group (HAM-A < 18). The primary efficacy measure was the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS).
In the severe anxiety group, significant improvement in the MADRS total score was observed with a moderate effect size (0.40) on lurasidone 20-60 mg, but lurasidone 80-120 mg was not significant (effect size, 0.21); however, in the non-severe anxiety group significant improvement was observed in both lurasidone treatment groups (effect size, 0.51 and 0.54, respectively). Common adverse events were akathisia and nausea, and the change in laboratory parameters and body weight were small and not clinically meaningful.
This was a post-hoc analysis of a short-term study.
This analysis suggests that lurasidone 20-60 mg is effective in patients with bipolar I depression regardless of their anxiety severity, with a generally good safety profile.
焦虑共病在双相情感障碍患者中很常见,并且与更高的疾病严重程度和治疗反应降低相关。本研究的目的是评估鲁拉西酮对伴有或不伴有严重焦虑症状的双相抑郁患者的疗效和安全性。
数据来自两项设计非常相似的双相I型抑郁研究,这些研究将患者随机、双盲地分为接受鲁拉西酮(20 - 60毫克/天或80 - 120毫克/天)治疗6周组与安慰剂组。根据患者基线时的汉密尔顿焦虑量表(HAM - A)评分将其分为两组:“严重”焦虑组(HAM - A≥18)和“非严重”焦虑组(HAM - A < 18)。主要疗效指标是蒙哥马利 - 阿斯伯格抑郁量表(MADRS)。
在严重焦虑组中,观察到MADRS总分有显著改善,鲁拉西酮20 - 60毫克组的效应量为中等(0.40),但鲁拉西酮80 - 120毫克组不显著(效应量为0.21);然而,在非严重焦虑组中,两个鲁拉西酮治疗组均观察到显著改善(效应量分别为0.51和0.54)。常见不良事件为静坐不能和恶心,实验室参数和体重变化较小且无临床意义。
这是一项短期研究的事后分析。
该分析表明,无论焦虑严重程度如何,20 - 60毫克的鲁拉西酮对双相I型抑郁患者有效,且总体安全性良好。