• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用脑电图微状态和深度学习技术对耳鸣患者进行增强分类。

Enhanced classification of tinnitus patients using EEG microstates and deep learning techniques.

作者信息

Raeisi Zahra, Sodagartojgi Abolfazl, Sharafkhani Fahimeh, Roshanzamir Amirsadegh, Najafzadeh Hossein, Bashiri Omid, Golkarieh Alireza

机构信息

Department of Computer Science, University of Fairleigh Dickinson, Vancouver Campus, Vancouver, Canada.

Department of Statistics, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ, USA.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2025 May 7;15(1):15959. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-01129-5.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-025-01129-5
PMID:40335585
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12059128/
Abstract

This study aims to deepen the understanding and classification of tinnitus through a comprehensive analysis of EEG signals utilizing innovative microstate analysis techniques and cutting-edge machine learning approaches. EEG data were collected from two datasets: a primary dataset with 36 participants (16 healthy, 20 tinnitus) and a public dataset with 37 participants (15 healthy, 22 tinnitus). Signals were decomposed into five frequency bands (delta, theta, alpha, beta, gamma) using Daubechies 4 wavelet at five decomposition levels. Microstate features (Duration, Occurrence, Mean Global Field Power, and Coverage) were extracted across four microstate configurations (4-state to 7-state) under both eyes-closed and eyes-open conditions. Classification was performed using SVM, Decision Tree, Random Forest, and Deep Neural Networks. Additionally, pre-trained models (VGG16, ResNet50, Xception) were used with a novel feature-to-image transformation approach for validation. Analysis revealed significant alterations in beta band microstates, with microstate A showing increased duration (+ 7.8% to + 11.2%) and microstate B showing decreased duration (- 9.0% to - 13.8%) in tinnitus patients. Occurrence rates were markedly elevated (~ 28-29% higher) in the tinnitus group. Transition probability analysis identified distinctive patterns between groups, with the most pronounced differences observed in gamma band (6-state configuration) during eyes-closed condition (healthy: F → B = 0.143; tinnitus: C → D = 0.153) and beta band (7-state configuration) also during eyes-closed condition (healthy: E → A = 0.091; tinnitus: C → E = 0.082). In the eyes-open condition, gamma band with 7 microstates showed substantial differences in transition patterns (healthy: E → A = 0.149; tinnitus: C → G = 0.157). Classification performance was exceptional, with DNN achieving 100% accuracy in the gamma frequency band during eyes-open condition with 5-state configuration. Frequency band analysis demonstrated that gamma band performed best for open eyes (99.89% accuracy) and beta band excelled for closed eyes (96.46% accuracy). Validation with pre-trained models showed ResNet50 with SVM classifier using 6-state configurations provided optimal discrimination (100% accuracy). EEG microstate dynamics in beta and gamma bands serve as reliable markers for distinguishing tinnitus patients. These findings provide insights into tinnitus-related neural alterations and highlight microstate analysis as a potential objective diagnostic tool for guiding personalized neuromodulation therapies.

摘要

本研究旨在通过利用创新的微状态分析技术和前沿的机器学习方法对脑电图(EEG)信号进行全面分析,加深对耳鸣的理解和分类。EEG数据来自两个数据集:一个主要数据集有36名参与者(16名健康者,20名耳鸣患者),一个公共数据集有37名参与者(15名健康者,22名耳鸣患者)。使用Daubechies 4小波在五个分解级别将信号分解为五个频段(δ、θ、α、β、γ)。在闭眼和睁眼条件下,跨四种微状态配置(4状态至7状态)提取微状态特征(持续时间、出现率、平均全局场功率和覆盖率)。使用支持向量机(SVM)、决策树、随机森林和深度神经网络进行分类。此外,预训练模型(VGG16、ResNet50、Xception)与一种新颖的特征到图像转换方法一起用于验证。分析显示,耳鸣患者β频段微状态有显著变化,微状态A的持续时间增加(+7.8%至+11.2%),微状态B的持续时间减少(-9.0%至-13.8%)。耳鸣组的出现率明显升高(高出约28 - 29%)。转移概率分析确定了两组之间的独特模式,在闭眼条件下,γ频段(6状态配置)观察到最明显的差异(健康者:F→B = 0.143;耳鸣患者:C→D = 0.153),β频段(7状态配置)在闭眼条件下也有差异(健康者:E→A = 0.091;耳鸣患者:C→E = 0.082)。在睁眼条件下,具有7个微状态的γ频段在转移模式上有显著差异(健康者:E→A = 0.149;耳鸣患者:C→G = 0.157)。分类性能出色,在睁眼条件下5状态配置时,深度神经网络在γ频段的准确率达到100%。频段分析表明,γ频段在睁眼时表现最佳(准确率99.89%),β频段在闭眼时表现出色(准确率96.46%)。使用预训练模型进行验证表明,采用6状态配置的ResNet50与SVM分类器提供了最佳区分效果(准确率100%)。β和γ频段的EEG微状态动力学可作为区分耳鸣患者的可靠标志物。这些发现为耳鸣相关的神经改变提供了见解,并突出了微状态分析作为指导个性化神经调节治疗的潜在客观诊断工具。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eeb9/12059128/0300ecd8c26d/41598_2025_1129_Fig14_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eeb9/12059128/1f9a55d6b376/41598_2025_1129_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eeb9/12059128/ecc78dc07ed5/41598_2025_1129_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eeb9/12059128/6b76fe53917a/41598_2025_1129_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eeb9/12059128/cacac6110513/41598_2025_1129_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eeb9/12059128/81cf350a58f0/41598_2025_1129_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eeb9/12059128/eeb232410b13/41598_2025_1129_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eeb9/12059128/d8f7f6994bd5/41598_2025_1129_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eeb9/12059128/b6350629d5d5/41598_2025_1129_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eeb9/12059128/6d22ae97fc21/41598_2025_1129_Fig9_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eeb9/12059128/25dad05d7523/41598_2025_1129_Fig10_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eeb9/12059128/49da4ed80a52/41598_2025_1129_Fig11_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eeb9/12059128/c63debaf4698/41598_2025_1129_Fig12_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eeb9/12059128/be74333ddba4/41598_2025_1129_Fig13_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eeb9/12059128/0300ecd8c26d/41598_2025_1129_Fig14_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eeb9/12059128/1f9a55d6b376/41598_2025_1129_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eeb9/12059128/ecc78dc07ed5/41598_2025_1129_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eeb9/12059128/6b76fe53917a/41598_2025_1129_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eeb9/12059128/cacac6110513/41598_2025_1129_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eeb9/12059128/81cf350a58f0/41598_2025_1129_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eeb9/12059128/eeb232410b13/41598_2025_1129_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eeb9/12059128/d8f7f6994bd5/41598_2025_1129_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eeb9/12059128/b6350629d5d5/41598_2025_1129_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eeb9/12059128/6d22ae97fc21/41598_2025_1129_Fig9_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eeb9/12059128/25dad05d7523/41598_2025_1129_Fig10_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eeb9/12059128/49da4ed80a52/41598_2025_1129_Fig11_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eeb9/12059128/c63debaf4698/41598_2025_1129_Fig12_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eeb9/12059128/be74333ddba4/41598_2025_1129_Fig13_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eeb9/12059128/0300ecd8c26d/41598_2025_1129_Fig14_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Enhanced classification of tinnitus patients using EEG microstates and deep learning techniques.使用脑电图微状态和深度学习技术对耳鸣患者进行增强分类。
Sci Rep. 2025 May 7;15(1):15959. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-01129-5.
2
EEG microstate biomarkers for schizophrenia: a novel approach using deep neural networks.精神分裂症的脑电图微状态生物标志物:一种使用深度神经网络的新方法。
Cogn Neurodyn. 2025 Dec;19(1):68. doi: 10.1007/s11571-025-10251-z. Epub 2025 May 3.
3
EEG spectral and microstate analysis originating residual inhibition of tinnitus induced by tailor-made notched music training.脑电图频谱和微状态分析源自量身定制的带陷波音乐训练诱导的耳鸣残余抑制。
Front Neurosci. 2023 Dec 11;17:1254423. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2023.1254423. eCollection 2023.
4
Unveiling Frequency-Specific Microstate Correlates of Anxiety and Depression Symptoms.揭示焦虑和抑郁症状的频率特异性微状态相关因素。
Brain Topogr. 2024 Nov 5;38(1):12. doi: 10.1007/s10548-024-01082-y.
5
Resting-state EEG microstate features for Alzheimer's disease classification.用于阿尔茨海默病分类的静息态脑电图微状态特征
PLoS One. 2024 Dec 12;19(12):e0311958. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0311958. eCollection 2024.
6
EEG microstate in people with different degrees of fear of heights during virtual high-altitude exposure.不同程度恐高人群在虚拟现实高空暴露时的 EEG 微观状态。
Brain Res Bull. 2024 Nov;218:111112. doi: 10.1016/j.brainresbull.2024.111112. Epub 2024 Oct 30.
7
Frequency- and state-dependent dynamics of EEG microstates during propofol anesthesia.丙泊酚麻醉期间脑电图微状态的频率和状态依赖性动力学
Neuroimage. 2025 Apr 15;310:121159. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2025.121159. Epub 2025 Mar 18.
8
Effects of Mental Workload Manipulation on Electroencephalography Spectrum Oscillation and Microstates in Multitasking Environments.多任务环境下心理负荷操纵对脑电图频谱振荡和微状态的影响
Brain Behav. 2025 Jan;15(1):e70216. doi: 10.1002/brb3.70216.
9
Differentiation with electroencephalography microstate in temporal lobe epilepsy with and without cognitive decline.伴或不伴认知功能减退的颞叶癫痫患者脑电图微状态的差异分析
Epilepsy Behav. 2025 May;166:110365. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2025.110365. Epub 2025 Mar 15.
10
Spectral decomposition of EEG microstates in post-traumatic stress disorder.脑电微状态在创伤后应激障碍中的频谱分解。
Neuroimage Clin. 2022;35:103135. doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2022.103135. Epub 2022 Jul 29.

本文引用的文献

1
Objective Neurophysiological Indices for the Assessment of Chronic Tinnitus Based on EEG Microstate Parameters.基于 EEG 微观状态参数评估慢性耳鸣的神经生理学指标。
IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2024;32:983-993. doi: 10.1109/TNSRE.2024.3367982. Epub 2024 Feb 28.
2
EEG spectral and microstate analysis originating residual inhibition of tinnitus induced by tailor-made notched music training.脑电图频谱和微状态分析源自量身定制的带陷波音乐训练诱导的耳鸣残余抑制。
Front Neurosci. 2023 Dec 11;17:1254423. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2023.1254423. eCollection 2023.
3
Electroencephalography Signal Processing: A Comprehensive Review and Analysis of Methods and Techniques.
脑电图信号处理:方法和技术的综合回顾与分析。
Sensors (Basel). 2023 Jul 16;23(14):6434. doi: 10.3390/s23146434.
4
Deep learning-based electroencephalic diagnosis of tinnitus symptom.基于深度学习的耳鸣症状脑电图诊断
Front Hum Neurosci. 2023 Apr 26;17:1126938. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2023.1126938. eCollection 2023.
5
Study on tinnitus-related electroencephalogram microstates in patients with vestibular schwannomas.前庭神经鞘瘤患者耳鸣相关脑电微状态的研究
Front Neurosci. 2023 Apr 6;17:1159019. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2023.1159019. eCollection 2023.
6
Deep Factor Learning for Accurate Brain Neuroimaging Data Analysis on Discrimination for Structural MRI and Functional MRI.深度因子学习在结构磁共振成像和功能磁共振成像的区分分析中的精确脑神经影像学数据分析。
IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform. 2024 Jul-Aug;21(4):582-595. doi: 10.1109/TCBB.2023.3252577. Epub 2024 Aug 8.
7
Cross-Subject Tinnitus Diagnosis Based on Multi-Band EEG Contrastive Representation Learning.基于多频带 EEG 对比表示学习的跨被试耳鸣诊断。
IEEE J Biomed Health Inform. 2023 Jul;27(7):3187-3197. doi: 10.1109/JBHI.2023.3264521. Epub 2023 Jun 30.
8
Prediction of Tinnitus Treatment Outcomes Based on EEG Sensors and TFI Score Using Deep Learning.基于 EEG 传感器和 TFI 评分的深度学习对耳鸣治疗效果的预测。
Sensors (Basel). 2023 Jan 12;23(2):902. doi: 10.3390/s23020902.
9
Emotion recognition using effective connectivity and pre-trained convolutional neural networks in EEG signals.利用脑电信号中的有效连接性和预训练卷积神经网络进行情绪识别。
Cogn Neurodyn. 2022 Oct;16(5):1087-1106. doi: 10.1007/s11571-021-09756-0. Epub 2022 Jan 9.
10
EEG signal classification of tinnitus based on SVM and sample entropy.基于支持向量机和样本熵的耳鸣脑电信号分类
Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin. 2023 Apr;26(5):580-594. doi: 10.1080/10255842.2022.2075698. Epub 2022 Jul 19.