Yang Chen, Veit Nicole C, McKenzie Kelly A, Aalla Shreya, Kishta Ameen, Embry Kyle, Roth Elliot J, Lieber Richard L, Jayaraman Arun
Shirley Ryan AbilityLab, Chicago, IL 60611, USA.
Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL 60611, USA.
Clin Neurophysiol Pract. 2025 Apr 22;10:150-158. doi: 10.1016/j.cnp.2025.04.001. eCollection 2025.
With growing interest in translating transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation (tSCS) into rehabilitation for different neurologic injuries, understanding the effects of various combinations of stimulation parameters becomes essential.
Twenty-one participants post-stroke completed an assessment to determine their resting motor threshold (RMT) (minimum current required to elicit a muscle response) and tolerance levels (uncomfortable current intensity) to 12 stimulation configurations: two square waveforms, biphasic and monophasic, paired with six carrier frequencies (unmodulated: 0, and modulated: 1, 3, 5, 7, and 10 kHz).
The results demonstrated that increasing carrier frequency increased participants' tolerance level and RMTs. Carrier frequency nor waveform type significantly altered discomfort when tolerance was normalized to the motor threshold, with 57 ± 23 % tolerated across all configurations. However, higher carrier frequencies, particularly biphasic waveforms at frequencies > 5 kHz, required more charge to reach a muscle activation and activated fewer muscles compared to unmodulated waveforms. No significant differences in discomfort relative to RMT were found between monophasic and biphasic waveforms.
Higher carrier frequency allows stimulation to be more comfortable at a given intensity, but it also requires more current to reach RMTs.
This study provides an essential feasibility assessment of tSCS configurations in a neurological population.
随着将经皮脊髓刺激(tSCS)应用于不同神经损伤康复的兴趣日益浓厚,了解刺激参数的各种组合效果变得至关重要。
21名中风后参与者完成了一项评估,以确定他们对12种刺激配置的静息运动阈值(RMT)(引发肌肉反应所需的最小电流)和耐受水平(不适电流强度):两种方形波形,双相和单相,与六种载波频率配对(未调制:0,调制:1、3、5、7和10kHz)。
结果表明,增加载波频率会提高参与者的耐受水平和RMT。当将耐受水平归一化到运动阈值时,载波频率和波形类型均未显著改变不适感,所有配置的耐受率为57±23%。然而,与未调制波形相比,更高的载波频率,特别是频率>5kHz的双相波形,达到肌肉激活需要更多电荷,且激活的肌肉更少。单相和双相波形在相对于RMT的不适感方面未发现显著差异。
更高的载波频率可使刺激在给定强度下更舒适,但也需要更多电流才能达到RMT。
本研究为神经人群中tSCS配置提供了重要的可行性评估。