• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Short-Term Outcomes of Oesophagectomy in a Real-World Scenario from a Tier II City in India.印度二级城市真实场景下食管切除术的短期结果
Indian J Surg Oncol. 2025 Apr;16(2):521-527. doi: 10.1007/s13193-024-01924-y. Epub 2024 Mar 20.
2
Laparoscopic versus open transhiatal oesophagectomy for oesophageal cancer.腹腔镜与开放经裂孔食管癌切除术治疗食管癌的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Mar 31;3(3):CD011390. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011390.pub2.
3
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.系统性药理学治疗慢性斑块状银屑病:网络荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Apr 19;4(4):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub4.
4
Drugs for preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting in adults after general anaesthesia: a network meta-analysis.成人全身麻醉后预防术后恶心呕吐的药物:网状Meta分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Oct 19;10(10):CD012859. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012859.pub2.
5
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of paclitaxel, docetaxel, gemcitabine and vinorelbine in non-small-cell lung cancer.对紫杉醇、多西他赛、吉西他滨和长春瑞滨在非小细胞肺癌中的临床疗效和成本效益进行的快速系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(32):1-195. doi: 10.3310/hta5320.
6
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.慢性斑块状银屑病的全身药理学治疗:一项网状荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Dec 22;12(12):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub2.
7
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.慢性斑块状银屑病的全身药理学治疗:一项网状Meta分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Jan 9;1(1):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub3.
8
Preoperative coronary interventions for preventing acute myocardial infarction in the perioperative period of major open vascular or endovascular surgery.术前冠状动脉介入治疗预防大型开放性血管或血管内手术后围手术期急性心肌梗死。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Jul 3;7(7):CD014920. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014920.pub2.
9
Falls prevention interventions for community-dwelling older adults: systematic review and meta-analysis of benefits, harms, and patient values and preferences.社区居住的老年人跌倒预防干预措施:系统评价和荟萃分析的益处、危害以及患者的价值观和偏好。
Syst Rev. 2024 Nov 26;13(1):289. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02681-3.
10
Sex as a prognostic factor for mortality in adults with acute symptomatic pulmonary embolism.性别作为急性症状性肺栓塞成年患者死亡率的一个预后因素。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Mar 20;3(3):CD013835. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013835.pub2.

本文引用的文献

1
A Rising Tide Lifts All Boats: Impact of Combined Volume of Complex Cancer Operations on Surgical Outcomes in a Low-Volume Setting.水涨船高:低容量环境下复杂癌症手术总量对手术结果的影响。
J Am Coll Surg. 2022 Jun 1;234(6):981-988. doi: 10.1097/XCS.0000000000000228. Epub 2022 May 11.
2
An esophagectomy Surgical Apgar Score (eSAS)-based nomogram for predicting major morbidity in patients with esophageal carcinoma.一种基于食管癌手术阿氏评分(eSAS)的列线图,用于预测食管癌患者的主要并发症。
Transl Cancer Res. 2020 Mar;9(3):1732-1741. doi: 10.21037/tcr.2020.02.56.
3
Short and Long-term Outcomes Among High-Volume vs Low-Volume Esophagectomy Surgeons at a High-Volume Center.高容量中心高容量与低容量食管切除术外科医生的短期和长期结果。
Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2022 Winter;34(4):1340-1350. doi: 10.1053/j.semtcvs.2021.09.007. Epub 2021 Sep 21.
4
Do the 2018 Leapfrog Group Minimal Hospital and Surgeon Volume Thresholds for Esophagectomy Favor Specific Patient Demographics?2018 年跃阶集团(Leapfrog Group)的食管切除术最低医院和外科医生手术量阈值是否有利于特定患者人群?
Ann Surg. 2021 Sep 1;274(3):e220-e229. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003553.
5
Guidelines for Perioperative Care in Esophagectomy: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Society Recommendations.食管癌切除术围手术期护理指南:加速康复外科(ERAS)学会推荐意见
World J Surg. 2019 Feb;43(2):299-330. doi: 10.1007/s00268-018-4786-4.
6
Anaesthesia during oesophagectomy.食管癌切除术期间的麻醉
J Thorac Dis. 2017 Jul;9(Suppl 8):S705-S712. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2017.03.153.
7
Mortality after esophagectomy is heavily impacted by center volume: retrospective analysis of the Nationwide Inpatient Sample.食管癌切除术后死亡率受中心手术量的严重影响:全国住院患者样本的回顾性分析
Surg Endosc. 2017 Jun;31(6):2491-2497. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-5251-9. Epub 2016 Sep 22.
8
Influence of Specialty Training and Trainee Involvement on Perioperative Outcomes of Esophagectomy.专科培训及学员参与对食管癌切除术围手术期结局的影响
Ann Thorac Surg. 2016 Dec;102(6):1829-1836. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2016.06.025. Epub 2016 Aug 25.
9
The PER (Preoperative Esophagectomy Risk) Score: A Simple Risk Score to Predict Short-Term and Long-Term Outcome in Patients with Surgically Treated Esophageal Cancer.PER(术前食管切除术风险)评分:一种预测手术治疗食管癌患者短期和长期预后的简单风险评分。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2016 Feb;95(7):e2724. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000002724.
10
International Consensus on Standardization of Data Collection for Complications Associated With Esophagectomy: Esophagectomy Complications Consensus Group (ECCG).食管癌切除术后并发症数据收集标准化国际共识:食管癌切除术后并发症共识小组(ECCG)
Ann Surg. 2015 Aug;262(2):286-94. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001098.

印度二级城市真实场景下食管切除术的短期结果

Short-Term Outcomes of Oesophagectomy in a Real-World Scenario from a Tier II City in India.

作者信息

Padhy Amita Sekhar, Nittala Rigved, Voleti Srikarthik, Chalapaka Chaitanya Raju

机构信息

Department of Surgical Oncology, Homi Bhabha Cancer Hospital & Research Centre, Visakhapatnam, 530053 Andhra Pradesh India.

出版信息

Indian J Surg Oncol. 2025 Apr;16(2):521-527. doi: 10.1007/s13193-024-01924-y. Epub 2024 Mar 20.

DOI:10.1007/s13193-024-01924-y
PMID:40337018
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12052618/
Abstract

This study evaluates short-term outcomes of oesophagectomy at a low-volume cancer hospital in Visakhapatnam, India. Fifteen patients who underwent oesophagectomy from 2020 to 2023 were analysed. The most common histology was squamous cell carcinoma. The mean age was 55 years and the majority were male. The common approaches used were open transhiatal and transthoracic oesophagectomy. The mean operative time was 9.5 h, and the mean hospital stay was 15.92 days. There were no perioperative deaths, but complications included pulmonary issues, vocal cord paralysis, anastomotic leaks, chyle leaks and wound infections. Higher volume centres tend to have better outcomes after oesophagectomy. However, factors other than volume like patient selection, ERAS (Enhanced Recovery After Surgery) protocols, specialized critical care and trained multidisciplinary teams also impact outcomes. At our centre, though a low-volume hospital, proper patient selection, prehabilitation and a collaborative team approach helped achieve acceptable results. We recommend developing consensus on defining low- and high-volume centres for oesophagectomy in the Indian context, based on disease burden, resources and constraints. Overall, there is a lack of Indian data comparing outcomes between low and high-volume centres for oesophagectomy.

摘要

本研究评估了印度维沙卡帕特南一家低容量癌症医院食管癌切除术的短期疗效。分析了2020年至2023年期间接受食管癌切除术的15例患者。最常见的组织学类型为鳞状细胞癌。平均年龄为55岁,大多数为男性。常用的手术方法为开放经裂孔和经胸食管癌切除术。平均手术时间为9.5小时,平均住院时间为15.92天。围手术期无死亡病例,但并发症包括肺部问题、声带麻痹、吻合口漏、乳糜漏和伤口感染。高容量中心食管癌切除术后的疗效往往更好。然而,除了手术量之外,患者选择、加速康复外科(ERAS)方案、专业重症监护和训练有素的多学科团队等因素也会影响疗效。在我们中心,尽管是一家低容量医院,但通过合理的患者选择、术前康复和协作团队方法,取得了可接受的结果。我们建议根据疾病负担、资源和限制,就印度背景下食管癌切除术低容量和高容量中心的定义达成共识。总体而言,印度缺乏比较食管癌切除术低容量和高容量中心疗效的数据。