Suppr超能文献

一项关于调查电子烟与传统香烟双重使用对戒烟影响的系统评价。

A systematic review investigating the impact of dual use of e-cigarettes and conventional cigarettes on smoking cessation.

作者信息

Hamoud Josef, Hanewinkel Reiner, Andreas Stefan, Ammous Omar, Saalfrank Marc, Sussman Steve, Unger Jennifer B, Pisinger Charlotta, Mathes Tim

机构信息

Department of Medical Statistics, University Medical Center Göttingen, Georg-August University Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.

Institut für Therapie- und Gesundheitsforschung, IFT-Nord gGmbH, Kiel, Germany.

出版信息

ERJ Open Res. 2025 May 6;11(3). doi: 10.1183/23120541.00902-2024. eCollection 2025 May.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Dual use (DU) of conventional cigarettes (CC) and e-cigarettes (EC) has emerged as a common pattern among youth and adult populations. This review aims to investigate whether DU can promote smoking cessation.

METHODS

A systematic search was conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines, and all longitudinal studies reporting transitions between DU, exclusive EC use and exclusive CC use were included. Two independent reviewers screened and read all records. Use status transitions among DU were compared to transitions among exclusive e-cigarette users and exclusive CC smokers.

RESULTS

46 records (16 original studies) were identified. Of 16 included studies, eight could be pooled for meta-analysis. The studies showed great heterogeneity, and many presented moderate to high risks of bias. Most DU who changed state transitioned to cigarette smoking. Baseline DU were less likely to report a transition into complete abstinence compared to exclusive CC smokers and exclusive EC users. About one-fifth of DU remained in the same use status after >16-24 months, exposing them to DU for a prolonged time. After >24-48 months, 8% of DU maintained DU.

CONCLUSION

Current evidence suggests that DU is not a first step towards smoking cessation, with most DU continuing cigarette consumption either through persistent DU or exclusive CC smoking. Relatively fewer DU transitioned into complete nicotine abstinence compared to exclusive CC and exclusive EC users. The concerns raised about limitations of current evidence highlight the need for more research focused on use status transitions among DU.

摘要

背景

传统卷烟(CC)和电子烟(EC)的双重使用(DU)已成为青少年和成年人群中的一种常见模式。本综述旨在调查双重使用是否能促进戒烟。

方法

按照PRISMA指南进行系统检索,纳入所有报告双重使用、仅使用电子烟和仅使用传统卷烟之间转变情况的纵向研究。两名独立评审员筛选并阅读所有记录。将双重使用者的使用状态转变与仅使用电子烟者和仅使用传统卷烟吸烟者的转变进行比较。

结果

共识别出46条记录(16项原始研究)。在纳入的16项研究中,8项可合并进行荟萃分析。这些研究显示出很大的异质性,许多研究存在中度至高度偏倚风险。大多数改变状态的双重使用者转变为吸烟。与仅使用传统卷烟吸烟者和仅使用电子烟者相比,基线双重使用者报告转变为完全戒烟的可能性较小。约五分之一的双重使用者在超过16 - 24个月后仍保持相同的使用状态,使他们长时间处于双重使用状态。超过24 - 48个月后,8%的双重使用者仍保持双重使用状态。

结论

目前的证据表明,双重使用并非迈向戒烟的第一步,大多数双重使用者通过持续双重使用或仅吸传统卷烟继续吸烟。与仅使用传统卷烟者和仅使用电子烟者相比,转变为完全戒烟的双重使用者相对较少。对当前证据局限性的担忧凸显了需要开展更多关注双重使用者使用状态转变的研究。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c3e8/12053992/bb3200d19c9b/00902-2024.01.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验