Carpenter Matthew J, Wahlquist Amy E, Dahne Jennifer, Gray Kevin M, Cummings K Michael, Warren Graham, Wagener Theodore L, Goniewicz Maciej L, Smith Tracy T
Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina (MUSC), Charleston, SC, USA.
Department of Public Health Sciences, MUSC, Charleston, SC, USA.
EClinicalMedicine. 2023 Aug 15;63:102142. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2023.102142. eCollection 2023 Sep.
As summarised in the most recent Cochrane review, the few clinical trials on e-cigarettes are largely focused on smoking cessation. We aimed to determine the naturalistic uptake, use, and impact of e-cigarettes among adults who may or may not want to stop smoking.
In this naturalistic, randomised, controlled clinical trial, adult smokers, across the motivational spectrum and with minimal history of e-cigarette use, were recruited online from the general community within 11 cities across the USA. Participants were randomly assigned (2:1) to either receive either a free 4-week supply of flavoured, tank-style e-cigarette, or not. E-cigarette group participants received a battery and device with up to 30 pre-filled tanks, offered among five flavours, with minimal instructions on use. The study's primary purpose was to descriptively assess naturalistic uptake and usage of the e-cigarette, and to secondarily assess its impact on smoking behavior. The latter, assessed through six months of follow-up, included: a) self-reported 7-day point prevalence abstinence, b) incidence of quit attempts, and c) smoking reduction. This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03453385.
Between 5/2018 and 3/2022, 638 adult smokers were enrolled and randomly assigned (427 in the e-cigarette group and 211 in the no-product control group). Uptake of e-cigarettes was robust: approximately 70% of participants used the product, with average usage exceeding 4 days per week during the initial 30 days. Based on an intent-to-treat approach where missing data is imputed as smoking, almost all behavioral outcomes favored the e-cigarette group relative to no-product control, including point prevalence abstinence at six months (Odds Ratio [OR] = 1.8; 95% Confidence Interval [CI] = 1.0-3.1), cumulative incidence of 24-hr quit attempts (OR = 1.5; 95% CI = 1.0-2.2), and having reduced smoking by at least 50% since baseline (OR = 1.8; 95% CI = 1.2-2.7). Results were similar under an alternative imputation.
Complementing cessation-focused trials, results suggest that unguided e-cigarette use also leads to smoking cessation, allaying the notion that causal effects of e-cigarettes on cessation are not reflective of real-world scenario of self-determined use. For smokers who may not be able to quit using existing pharmacologic approaches, e-cigarettes may be considered to achive that purpose.
National Cancer Institute.
正如最新的考科蓝系统评价所总结的那样,关于电子烟的临床试验较少,且主要集中在戒烟方面。我们旨在确定在可能想要或不想要戒烟的成年人中电子烟的自然使用情况、使用方式及其影响。
在这项自然主义的随机对照临床试验中,从美国11个城市的普通社区在线招募了处于不同动机范围且电子烟使用史极少的成年吸烟者。参与者被随机分配(2:1),要么免费获得为期4周的调味罐式电子烟供应,要么不获得。电子烟组参与者收到一个电池和设备,配有多达30个预先填充的烟弹,有五种口味可供选择,并提供了最少的使用说明。该研究的主要目的是描述性地评估电子烟的自然使用情况和使用方式,并其次评估其对吸烟行为的影响。后者通过六个月的随访进行评估,包括:a)自我报告的7天点患病率戒烟情况,b)戒烟尝试的发生率,以及c)吸烟量减少情况。该试验已在ClinicalTrials.gov注册,注册号为NCT03453385。
在2018年5月至2022年3月期间,638名成年吸烟者被纳入并随机分配(电子烟组427名,无产品对照组211名)。电子烟的使用率很高:约70%的参与者使用了该产品,在最初的30天内平均每周使用超过4天。基于意向性分析方法,将缺失数据视为吸烟,几乎所有行为结果在电子烟组相对于无产品对照组方面都更有利,包括六个月时的点患病率戒烟情况(优势比[OR]=1.8;95%置信区间[CI]=1.0 - 3.1)、24小时戒烟尝试的累积发生率(OR=1.5;95%CI=1.0 - 2.2),以及自基线以来吸烟量减少至少50%的情况(OR=1.8;95%CI=1.2 - 2.7)。在另一种归因方法下结果相似。
补充以戒烟为重点的试验,结果表明无指导的电子烟使用也会导致戒烟,消除了电子烟对戒烟的因果效应不能反映自主使用的现实情况的观念。对于可能无法通过现有药物方法戒烟的吸烟者,可以考虑使用电子烟来实现这一目的。
美国国立癌症研究所。