Suppr超能文献

动脉内溶栓与机械取栓的比较效果:文献综述

Comparative effectiveness of intra-arterial thrombolysis vs. mechanical thrombectomy: a literature review.

作者信息

Bekele Bisrat Abate, Uwishema Olivier, Adam Abel Haileyesus, Gashu Abdi Degefu, Kachouh Charbel, Mshaymesh Sarah, Wellington Jack

机构信息

Department of Research and Education, Oli Health Magazine Organization, Kigali, Rwanda.

School of Medicine, College of Health Sciences, Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.

出版信息

Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2025 Apr 16;87(5):2749-2757. doi: 10.1097/MS9.0000000000003139. eCollection 2025 May.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Acute ischemic stroke (AIS) remains one of the leading causes of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Time is the single most critical factor in the management of patients presenting with AIS, where re-opening of occluded blood vessels is paramount. Intra-arterial thrombolysis (IAT) and mechanical thrombectomy (MT) are two such therapies employed to reestablish cerebrovascular blood flow in patients with AIS. This review compares both IAT and MT according to their efficacy, safety profiles, recanalization rates, clinical outcomes, and adverse procedural events.

METHODS

Study abstraction from electronic search databases comprising PubMed/MEDLINE, ResearchGate, and the National Library of Medicine was used. Screening and selection of relevant articles were comprehensively conducted for this review. Direct comparisons between IAT and MT in terms of variables including recanalization rates, clinical outcomes, and adverse procedural events were warranted for study inclusion. Research determined to exhibit insufficient data or without comparable groups were subsequently excluded.

RESULTS

MT was prompter when executing procedures than IAT, achieving greater rates of recanalization. Both interventions displayed similar results regarding rates of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) and mortality. Despite current available data indicating MT to demonstrate more efficiency as a procedure, further research is needed to examine IAT in light of specific patient demographics, clinical presentation, and circumstances.

CONCLUSION

This review elucidated that MT often takes less time peri-procedurally, achieving greater success in revascularization compared with that of IAT. Regarding mortality and sICH rates, IAT and MT comparison showed equivocal results. Thus, while making therapeutic decisions, it is important to consider the unique clinical features of each patient as well as the timing of interventions in order to maximize treatment outcomes.

摘要

背景

急性缺血性卒中(AIS)仍然是全球发病和死亡的主要原因之一。时间是AIS患者管理中最关键的单一因素,其中重新开通闭塞血管至关重要。动脉内溶栓(IAT)和机械取栓(MT)是用于恢复AIS患者脑血管血流的两种此类治疗方法。本综述根据IAT和MT的疗效、安全性、再通率、临床结局和不良手术事件对两者进行比较。

方法

使用从包括PubMed/MEDLINE、ResearchGate和美国国立医学图书馆在内的电子搜索数据库中提取的研究。对相关文章进行了全面的筛选和选择,以进行本综述。对IAT和MT在再通率、临床结局和不良手术事件等变量方面进行直接比较,以纳入研究。随后排除了数据不足或没有可比组的研究。

结果

MT在执行手术时比IAT更快,实现了更高的再通率。两种干预措施在症状性颅内出血(sICH)率和死亡率方面显示出相似的结果。尽管目前可用的数据表明MT作为一种手术更有效,但需要根据特定的患者人口统计学、临床表现和情况对IAT进行进一步研究。

结论

本综述阐明,MT在围手术期通常花费的时间较少,与IAT相比,在血管再通方面取得了更大的成功。关于死亡率和sICH率,IAT和MT的比较结果不明确。因此,在做出治疗决策时,重要的是要考虑每个患者的独特临床特征以及干预时机,以最大限度地提高治疗效果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bed8/12055068/87b7dafbb9df/ms9-87-2749-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验