Suppr超能文献

评估从印度北部一家顶尖医院分离出的临床分离株对头孢他啶-阿维巴坦的敏感性。 (你提供的原文中“and”前后内容缺失,这可能影响对完整意思的准确理解,以上是基于现有内容尽量准确的翻译)

Evaluating the susceptibility to ceftazidime-avibactam in clinical isolates of and recovered from an apex medical hospital in north India.

作者信息

Bali Nargis, Ahmed Tufail, Borkakoty Biswajyoti, Bali Roseleen, Ara Mir Anjum, Teli Zubair, Nisar Qounser, Faisal Tantray

机构信息

Department of Microbiology, Sher-i-Kashmir Institute of Medical Sciences, Soura, Jammu & Kashmir, India.

Department of Microbiology, Govt Medical College, Anantnag, Jammu & Kashmir, India.

出版信息

Iran J Microbiol. 2025 Apr;17(2):253-260. doi: 10.18502/ijm.v17i2.18385.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

We assessed the susceptibility of ceftazidime+avibactam (CZA/AVI) in and isolated from intensive care units of our hospital.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Clinical samples from Jan 2022 to Dec 2023 at SKIMS Soura, were processed for the recovery of and . Susceptibility testing was done by disc diffusion (DD) method and minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) for CZA/AVI and meropenem was assessed using E-test strips. Categorical agreement (CA), very major errors (VME), major errors (ME) and minor errors (mE) between DD and MIC were measured. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS version 22.0.

RESULTS

A total of 111 and 81 were part of the study. Of these, 56.8% and 45.7% isolates were susceptible to CZA/AVI. MIC of CZA/AVI for ranged from 0.125 to ≥ 256 μg/ml and for it ranged from 0.032 to 128 μg/ml. CA was 97.29% between DD and E-Test for CZA/AVI in isolates, with a ME of 2.70%. For CA between DD and E-Test for CZA/AVI was 98.76% with a VME of 1.23%. MIC values of meropenem were higher than CZA/AVI even in sensitive isolates.

CONCLUSION

CZA/AVI shows good in-vitro activity against clinical isolates of and and can be part of empirical therapy for treating infections caused by these bacteria.

摘要

背景与目的

我们评估了头孢他啶+阿维巴坦(CZA/AVI)对我院重症监护病房分离出的[具体细菌名称1]和[具体细菌名称2]的敏感性。

材料与方法

对2022年1月至2023年12月在SKIMS Soura采集的临床样本进行处理,以分离出[具体细菌名称1]和[具体细菌名称2]。采用纸片扩散法(DD)进行药敏试验,并用E-test试纸条评估CZA/AVI和美罗培南的最低抑菌浓度(MIC)。测定DD法与MIC法之间的类别一致性(CA)、极重大错误(VME)、重大错误(ME)和微小错误(mE)。使用SPSS 22.0版进行统计分析。

结果

共有111株[具体细菌名称1]和81株[具体细菌名称2]纳入研究。其中,56.8%的[具体细菌名称1]菌株和45.7%的[具体细菌名称2]菌株对CZA/AVI敏感。CZA/AVI对[具体细菌名称1]的MIC范围为0.125至≥256μg/ml,对[具体细菌名称2]的MIC范围为0.032至128μg/ml。在[具体细菌名称1]菌株中,CZA/AVI的DD法与E-test法之间的CA为97.29%,ME为2.70%。在[具体细菌名称2]菌株中,CZA/AVI的DD法与E-test法之间的CA为98.76%,VME为1.23%。即使在敏感菌株中,美罗培南的MIC值也高于CZA/AVI。

结论

CZA/AVI对[具体细菌名称1]和[具体细菌名称2]的临床分离株显示出良好的体外活性,可作为治疗这些细菌引起感染的经验性治疗药物之一。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e84f/12053426/989a51af5a84/IJM-17-253-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验