• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

从自我评估和外部评估视角看农村贫困人口的心理特征及其与社会人口学因素的关联。

Psychological characteristics of the rural poor from self-assessment and external assessment perspectives and their association with socio-demographic factors.

作者信息

Wei Wei, Li Yan, Zhu Jinwei

机构信息

School of Teacher Development, Shaanxi Normal University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China.

Faculty of Education, Shaanxi Xueqian Normal University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2025 Apr 23;16:1566612. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1566612. eCollection 2025.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1566612
PMID:40337712
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12055790/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to explore the differences in psychological traits between rural poor individuals from self-assessment and external assessment perspectives, and to examine the correlation between the main socio-demographic factors of the poor population and their psychological traits. The ultimate goal is to provide a scientific basis for the formulation of effective poverty alleviation policies and to promote the development of poverty psychology and anti-poverty psychology.

METHODS

The study involved 1,943 poor individuals and 1,889 non-poor individuals from over 80 natural villages across eight provinces(regions) in central China (Shanxi, Henan, Hubei), northwestern China (Shaanxi, Xinjiang, Qinghai), and southwestern China (Guizhou and Yunnan). The psychological trait levels of the poor rural population were assessed using the "Rural poor Population Psychological Trait Assessment Questionnaire."

RESULTS

Independent samples t-test showed that, from both self-assessment and external assessment perspectives, the poor population scored significantly higher on traits of retractability and stubbornness, while scoring significantly lower on the trait of grit compared to the non-poor population. The results of hierarchical linear regression indicated that socio-demographic factors such as age, health status, family size, and the poverty degree of the poor individuals contributed to 5.2% of the variance in the formation of psychological traits among the rural poor population.

CONCLUSION

From both self-assessment and external assessment perspectives, significant differences were observed between the poor and non-poor populations in terms of their evaluations on traits of retractability, grit, and stubbornness. This indicates that there is a notable disparity between the poor individuals' own perceptions and cognitions and the external evaluations they receive. The socio-demographic factors of rural poor individuals contribute only 5.2% to the variance in the formation of their psychological traits. This suggests that the deeper socio-cultural roots underlying the formation of psychological traits in the poor population await further exploration.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在从自我评估和外部评估的角度探讨农村贫困人口心理特质的差异,并考察贫困人口主要社会人口学因素与其心理特质之间的相关性。最终目的是为制定有效的扶贫政策提供科学依据,推动贫困心理学和反贫困心理学的发展。

方法

本研究涉及中国中部(山西、河南、湖北)、西北部(陕西、新疆、青海)和西南部(贵州、云南)八个省份(地区)80多个自然村落的1943名贫困人口和1889名非贫困人口。使用“农村贫困人口心理特质评估问卷”对农村贫困人口的心理特质水平进行评估。

结果

独立样本t检验显示,从自我评估和外部评估的角度来看,贫困人口在退缩性和固执性特质上的得分显著高于非贫困人口,而在坚毅性特质上的得分显著低于非贫困人口。分层线性回归结果表明,年龄、健康状况、家庭规模和贫困人口的贫困程度等社会人口学因素对农村贫困人口心理特质形成的方差贡献率为5.2%。

结论

从自我评估和外部评估的角度来看,贫困人口和非贫困人口在退缩性、坚毅性和固执性特质的评价上存在显著差异。这表明贫困人口自身的认知与他们所获得的外部评价之间存在明显差距。农村贫困人口的社会人口学因素对其心理特质形成的方差贡献率仅为5.2%。这表明贫困人口心理特质形成背后更深层次的社会文化根源有待进一步探索。

相似文献

1
Psychological characteristics of the rural poor from self-assessment and external assessment perspectives and their association with socio-demographic factors.从自我评估和外部评估视角看农村贫困人口的心理特征及其与社会人口学因素的关联。
Front Psychol. 2025 Apr 23;16:1566612. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1566612. eCollection 2025.
2
The characteristic of poverty-alleviation behavioral strategies of the rural poor population and their relationship with socio-demographic factors.农村贫困人口脱贫行为策略的特征及其与社会人口因素的关系。
Front Psychol. 2024 Dec 30;15:1450291. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1450291. eCollection 2024.
3
Women, population and development: rural women's passage to empowerment.妇女、人口与发展:农村妇女通向赋权之路
China Popul Today. 1995 Dec;12(5-6):6-13.
4
The Effects of China's Targeted Poverty Alleviation Policy on the Health and Health Equity of Rural Poor Residents: Evidence from Shaanxi Province.中国精准扶贫政策对农村贫困居民健康及健康公平性的影响:来自陕西省的证据
Healthcare (Basel). 2020 Aug 6;8(3):256. doi: 10.3390/healthcare8030256.
5
Association between happiness and psychopathology in an elderly regional rural population in Crete.克里特岛老年农村地区人群中幸福感与精神病理学之间的关联。
Psychiatriki. 2019 Oct-Dec;30(4):299-310. doi: 10.22365/jpsych.2019.304.299.
6
Ecological and geographic characteristics predict nutritional status of communities: rapid assessment for poor villages.生态和地理特征可预测社区营养状况:贫困村庄的快速评估
Health Policy Plan. 1998 Dec;13(4):408-16. doi: 10.1093/heapol/13.4.408.
7
An assessment of the one-child policy in China from 1980 to 1985.对中国1980年至1985年独生子女政策的评估。
Eur J Popul. 1990 Sep;6(3):257-84. doi: 10.1007/BF01796621.
8
Who attracts whom to rural general practice? Variation in temperament and character profiles of GP registrars across different vocational training pathways.谁会吸引谁投身乡村全科医疗?不同职业培训途径的全科医生注册实习生的气质和性格特征差异。
Rural Remote Health. 2015 Oct-Dec;15(4):3426. Epub 2015 Nov 17.
9
Analysis of medical impoverishment and its influencing factors among China's rural near-poor, 2016-2020.2016-2020 年中国农村准贫困人口的医疗致贫分析及其影响因素。
Front Public Health. 2024 May 16;12:1412536. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1412536. eCollection 2024.
10
A survey analysis of the effects of the home environment on cultural quality.家庭环境对文化素质影响的调查分析
Chin J Popul Sci. 1991;3(1):75-87.

本文引用的文献

1
Socioeconomic status and the developing brain - A systematic review of neuroimaging findings in youth.社会经济地位与大脑发育:青少年神经影像学研究的系统综述。
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2021 Nov;130:379-407. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2021.08.027. Epub 2021 Aug 30.
2
Poverty, depression, and anxiety: Causal evidence and mechanisms.贫困、抑郁和焦虑:因果证据和机制。
Science. 2020 Dec 11;370(6522). doi: 10.1126/science.aay0214.
3
The impact of childhood poverty on brain health: Emerging evidence from neuroimaging across the lifespan.童年贫困对大脑健康的影响:神经影像学在整个生命周期中的新证据。
Int Rev Neurobiol. 2020;150:77-105. doi: 10.1016/bs.irn.2019.12.001. Epub 2019 Dec 18.
4
Socioeconomic disadvantage, brain morphometry, and attentional bias to threat in middle childhood.社会经济劣势、大脑形态测量学与儿童中期对威胁的注意力偏向。
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2019 Apr;19(2):309-326. doi: 10.3758/s13415-018-00670-3.
5
Motivational Accounts of the Vicious Cycle of Social Status: An Integrative Framework Using the United States as a Case Study.社会地位恶性循环的动机解释:以美国为例的综合框架。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2019 Mar;14(2):107-137. doi: 10.1177/1745691618788875. Epub 2018 Nov 2.
6
The Economic Importance of Financial Literacy: Theory and Evidence.金融知识的经济重要性:理论与证据
J Econ Lit. 2014 Mar;52(1):5-44. doi: 10.1257/jel.52.1.5.
7
How Social Status Shapes Person Perception and Evaluation: A Social Neuroscience Perspective.社会地位如何塑造人际感知与评价:社会神经科学视角。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2017 May;12(3):468-507. doi: 10.1177/1745691616677828.
8
The behavioural, cognitive, and neural corollaries of blunted cardiovascular and cortisol reactions to acute psychological stress.心血管和皮质醇对急性心理应激反应迟钝的行为、认知及神经相关因素。
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2017 Jun;77:74-86. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2017.02.025. Epub 2017 Feb 27.
9
Poverty and Economic Decision-Making: Evidence from Changes in Financial Resources at Payday.贫困与经济决策:来自发薪日财务资源变化的证据。
Am Econ Rev. 2016 Feb;106(2):260-284. doi: 10.1257/aer.20140481.
10
Family income, parental education and brain structure in children and adolescents.儿童和青少年的家庭收入、父母教育程度与脑结构
Nat Neurosci. 2015 May;18(5):773-8. doi: 10.1038/nn.3983. Epub 2015 Mar 30.