Collard James J, Stephens Amanda N
Faculty of Psychology, Counselling and Psychotherapy, Cairnmillar Institute, 391-393 Tooronga Road, Hawthorn East, Melbourne, VIC, 3123, Australia.
Monash University Accident Research Centre, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, 3800, Australia.
Cogn Process. 2025 May 8. doi: 10.1007/s10339-025-01274-9.
Forgiveness is crucial for emotional wellbeing and good mental health. It is therefore important to understand what cognitive processes may promote forgiveness to achieve optimal outcomes for individuals. There is some evidence to suggest that core self-evaluation (CSE) is related to how forgiving an individual may be. However, these studies have shown that this influence may be mediated by other cognitive processes. To date, the combined role of anger rumination and mindfulness as potential mediators has not been considered. This is despite recognized associations with constructs that underly CSE. To address this gap in knowledge, this study aimed to explore the relationship between CSE and forgiveness; considering whether this relationship is mediated by mindfulness and anger rumination. A further contribution to knowledge was that these relationships were considered across the three subtypes of forgiveness: self, others, and situation. A total of 490 participants (54% men; 45% women; 1% non-binary; average age = 43.7 years; SD = 17.7) provided complete responses to an online questionnaire measuring CSE, forgiveness, mindfulness, and anger rumination. The results demonstrated that CSE was positively related to forgiveness and mindfulness and negatively related to anger rumination. Mediation analysis demonstrated that some of the influence of CSE on forgiveness was through mindfulness and anger rumination. These results indicate that people with higher levels of CSE tend to have a greater degree of mindfulness, are less likely to engage in anger rumination, and are subsequently more likely to be forgiving. These findings provide further insight into the beliefs and processes that contribute to an individual's willingness to forgive. It also suggests that interventions targeting CSE, mindfulness, and anger rumination can help with the promotion of forgiveness.
宽恕对于情绪健康和良好的心理健康至关重要。因此,了解哪些认知过程可能促进宽恕,以实现个体的最佳结果非常重要。有证据表明,核心自我评价(CSE)与个体的宽恕程度有关。然而,这些研究表明,这种影响可能由其他认知过程介导。迄今为止,愤怒沉思和正念作为潜在中介的联合作用尚未得到考虑。尽管它们与构成核心自我评价的结构有公认的关联,但仍未被考虑。为了填补这一知识空白,本研究旨在探讨核心自我评价与宽恕之间的关系;考虑这种关系是否由正念和愤怒沉思介导。对知识的进一步贡献在于,这些关系是在宽恕的三种亚型(自我、他人和情境)中进行考量的。共有490名参与者(54%为男性;45%为女性;1%为非二元性别;平均年龄 = 43.7岁;标准差 = 17.7)对一份测量核心自我评价、宽恕、正念和愤怒沉思的在线问卷提供了完整回答。结果表明,核心自我评价与宽恕和正念呈正相关,与愤怒沉思呈负相关。中介分析表明,核心自我评价对宽恕的部分影响是通过正念和愤怒沉思实现的。这些结果表明,核心自我评价水平较高的人往往具有更高程度的正念,较少进行愤怒沉思,因此更有可能宽恕他人。这些发现为有助于个体宽恕意愿的信念和过程提供了进一步的见解。这也表明,针对核心自我评价、正念和愤怒沉思的干预措施有助于促进宽恕。
Autism Adulthood. 2024-12-2
Psychopharmacol Bull. 2024-7-8
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012-3-14
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023-2-6
Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2019-7-25
Emotion. 2019-1-17
Mindfulness (N Y). 2018
J Gerontol Soc Work. 2017
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2012-3-6