Rothstein Melissa C, Stamates Amy L
Department of Psychology, University of Rhode Island, Kingston, Rhode Island, USA.
J Am Coll Health. 2025 May 8:1-9. doi: 10.1080/07448481.2025.2501008.
The purpose of the present study was to examine (1) differences in descriptive and injunctive norms for alcohol, cannabis, and co-use, (2) whether descriptive and injunctive norms for alcohol, cannabis, and co-use were associated with co-use frequency, and (3) whether co-use descriptive and injunctive norms were associated with co-use consequences. Participants were 209 college students who were required to have engaged in only alcohol, only cannabis, and co-use in the past year. Participants completed an online survey about their substance use. For Aim 1, participants held the strongest descriptive and injunctive norms for alcohol use. For Aim 2, descriptive norms for co-use were related to greater co-use frequency; injunctive norms were not associated with co-use frequency. For Aim 3, both types of norms were not associated with co-use consequences. In comparison to descriptive norms for alcohol-only and cannabis-only, descriptive norms for co-use were most strongly tied with personal co-use frequency. Findings may inform intervention work focused on college students who engage in co-use by targeting normative perceptions of co-use.
(1)酒精、大麻及同时使用这三种情况在描述性规范和指令性规范方面的差异;(2)酒精、大麻及同时使用的描述性规范和指令性规范是否与同时使用的频率相关;(3)同时使用的描述性规范和指令性规范是否与同时使用的后果相关。研究参与者为209名大学生,要求他们在过去一年中仅使用酒精、仅使用大麻或同时使用这两种物质。参与者完成了一项关于其物质使用情况的在线调查。对于目标1,参与者对酒精使用持有最强的描述性规范和指令性规范。对于目标2,同时使用的描述性规范与更高的同时使用频率相关;指令性规范与同时使用频率无关。对于目标3,两种类型的规范均与同时使用的后果无关。与仅使用酒精和仅使用大麻的描述性规范相比,同时使用的描述性规范与个人同时使用频率的联系最为紧密。研究结果可为针对同时使用物质的大学生的干预工作提供参考,干预工作可针对对同时使用的规范性认知展开。