Wan-Jun Yang, Zhi-Long Geng, Yuan-Yuan Gao, Chao-Yuan Cui, Zheng-Ze Chen, Zi-Wei Tian, Xi-Lin Guo, Ya-Nan Zhang, Lu Wang, Rui Huo, Chen-Wei Ma, Jing Niu
Department of Anesthesiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Medical University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China.
Department of Anesthesiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Air Force Medical University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China.
Perioper Med (Lond). 2025 May 8;14(1):53. doi: 10.1186/s13741-025-00525-9.
Elderly patients are a vulnerable group with high perioperative risks. Thus, reducing the duration of anesthesia is important. Remimazolam is a benzodiazepine sedative commonly used for the induction and maintenance of general anesthesia given its rapid induction and rapid recovery. Most reports have focused on nonelderly patients.
To compare the time to loss of consciousness, length of PACU stay and incidence of adverse events in patients older than 65 years who received remimazolam for general anesthesia with those of patients who received midazolam.
This study was conducted at a university hospital between February 2022 and March 2023. We included 100 patients aged 65 years or older who were scheduled for surgery under general anesthesia. Patients were divided into 2 groups, namely, the midazolam group and the remimazolam group, with 50 patients in each group. The primary outcome was the time to loss of consciousness. The secondary outcomes included the time to extubation and length of PACU stay. We also recorded the percentage of flumazenil used and incidence of adverse events.
Clinical data from 96 patients who were scheduled for surgery under general anesthesia were included in the final analysis, with 46 patients in the remimazolam group and 50 patients in the midazolam group. The time to loss of consciousness was 304 (222, 330) s in the remimazolam group and 95 (67, 25) s in the midazolam group, and the difference was significant (p = 0.000). The time to extubation was 24.93 ± 11.617 min in the remimazolam group and 34.88 ± 19.740 min in the midazolam group, revealing a significant difference (p = 0.003). The length of PACU stay was 55 (48, 64) min in the remimazolam group and 65 (55, 85) min in the midazolam group, and the difference was significant (p = 0.001). The percentage of flumazenil used was 6% in the remimazolam group and 20% in the midazolam group, and the difference was significant (p = 0.003).
General anesthesia with remimazolam has been shown to be effective and safe for surgery in elderly patients. The time to extubation was significantly shorter, length of PACU stay was shorter, and percentage of flumazenil used was lower in the remimazolam group than in the midazolam group.
老年患者是围手术期风险较高的脆弱群体。因此,缩短麻醉时间很重要。瑞马唑仑是一种苯二氮䓬类镇静剂,因其诱导迅速、恢复快,常用于全身麻醉的诱导和维持。大多数报告都集中在非老年患者身上。
比较65岁以上接受瑞马唑仑全身麻醉的患者与接受咪达唑仑的患者的意识消失时间、麻醉后监护病房(PACU)停留时间及不良事件发生率。
本研究于2022年2月至2023年3月在一家大学医院进行。我们纳入了100例计划接受全身麻醉手术的65岁及以上患者。患者分为2组,即咪达唑仑组和瑞马唑仑组,每组50例。主要结局是意识消失时间。次要结局包括拔管时间和PACU停留时间。我们还记录了氟马西尼的使用百分比和不良事件发生率。
最终分析纳入了96例计划接受全身麻醉手术患者的临床数据,其中瑞马唑仑组46例,咪达唑仑组50例。瑞马唑仑组意识消失时间为304(222,330)秒,咪达唑仑组为95(67,25)秒,差异有统计学意义(p = 0.000)。瑞马唑仑组拔管时间为24.93±11.617分钟,咪达唑仑组为34.88±19.740分钟,差异有统计学意义(p = 0.003)。瑞马唑仑组PACU停留时间为55(48,64)分钟,咪达唑仑组为65(55,85)分钟,差异有统计学意义(p = 0.001)。瑞马唑仑组氟马西尼使用百分比为6%,咪达唑仑组为20%,差异有统计学意义(p = 0.003)。
已证明瑞马唑仑全身麻醉对老年患者手术有效且安全。瑞马唑仑组的拔管时间明显更短,PACU停留时间更短,氟马西尼使用百分比低于咪达唑仑组。