• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

个性化风险预测对乳腺癌风险认知的影响:BREATHE研究的见解

Impact of personalised risk predictions on breast cancer risk perceptions: insights from the BREATHE study.

作者信息

Ho Peh Joo, Goh Su-Ann, Goh Serene Si Ning, Liu Jenny, Chew Ying Jia, Riza Nur Khaliesah Mohamed, Oh Han Boon, Chin Chi Hui, Kwek Sing Cheer, Zhang Zhi Peng, Ong Desmond Luan Seng, Quek Swee Tian, Wijerathne Sujith, Li Jingmei, Iau Philip Tsau Choong, Hartman Mikael

机构信息

Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore and National University Health System, Singapore, 117549, Singapore.

Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR), Genome Institute of Singapore (GIS), 60 Biopolis Street, Singapore, 138672, Singapore.

出版信息

J Transl Med. 2025 May 8;23(1):517. doi: 10.1186/s12967-025-06515-1.

DOI:10.1186/s12967-025-06515-1
PMID:40340901
原文链接:
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12063409/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Biennial mammography screening is well-established for women aged 50 and above, but guidelines for younger women are less clear. Risk-based screening may provide women with key information to make informed decisions about their breast cancer risk and screening. This study examines how predicted breast cancer (BC) risk shapes women's perception and confidence in risk prediction.

METHODS

Women aged 35 to 59 years were recruited for a prospective multi-centre cohort and stratified into above-average, average, or below-average BC risk categories based on genetic and non-genetic risk factors. Perceived risk was assessed at enrolment and after participants were informed of their predicted risk. We used ordinal models to identify predictors of perceived risk and logistic regression to examine the relationship between changes in perceived risk and confidence in the risk prediction.

RESULTS

At enrolment, 43% and 47% of 4112 participants perceived their BC risk pre-result as low or average, respectively. Thirty-five percent adjusted their perceived risk to align more closely with their predicted risk. Predictors of perceived risk post-result: perceived risk pre-result, predicted risk, ethnicity and having regular menstruation. Participants who underestimated their BC risk were nearly eight times more likely to have low confidence in the accuracy of their predicted risk (OR for underestimation vs. accurate perception: 7.94 [95% CI 5.60-11.28]). Predictors of perceived risk post-result: perceived risk pre-result, predicted risk, ethnicity and having regular menstruation. Confidence in risk prediction was lowest when women's perceived risk pre-result was lower than their predicted risk (OR [95%CI] 5.06 [3.67 to 6.97]).

CONCLUSION

Many women underestimated their BC risk, and their initial perceptions were influenced by the knowledge of their predicted risk. Women who underestimated their risk had less confidence in their predicted risk scores.

摘要

目的

对于50岁及以上的女性,每两年进行一次乳房X光筛查已得到广泛认可,但针对年轻女性的筛查指南尚不够明确。基于风险的筛查可为女性提供关键信息,以便她们就自身乳腺癌风险和筛查做出明智决策。本研究探讨预测的乳腺癌(BC)风险如何影响女性对风险预测的认知和信心。

方法

招募35至59岁的女性参与一项前瞻性多中心队列研究,并根据遗传和非遗传风险因素将她们分为乳腺癌风险高于平均水平、平均水平或低于平均水平三类。在入组时以及参与者得知其预测风险后,评估她们感知到的风险。我们使用有序模型来确定感知风险的预测因素,并使用逻辑回归来检验感知风险变化与风险预测信心之间的关系。

结果

在入组时,4112名参与者中分别有43%和47%认为她们在得知结果前的乳腺癌风险较低或为平均水平。35%的人调整了她们感知到的风险,使其更接近预测风险。得知结果后感知风险的预测因素:得知结果前的感知风险、预测风险、种族和月经规律。低估自身乳腺癌风险的参与者对其预测风险准确性缺乏信心的可能性几乎高出八倍(低估与准确认知的比值比:7.94[95%置信区间5.60 - 11.28])。得知结果后感知风险的预测因素:得知结果前的感知风险、预测风险、种族和月经规律。当女性得知结果前的感知风险低于其预测风险时,对风险预测的信心最低(比值比[95%置信区间]5.06[3.67至6.97])。

结论

许多女性低估了她们的乳腺癌风险,并且她们最初的认知受到其预测风险知识的影响。低估自身风险的女性对其预测风险评分的信心较低。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7244/12063409/4eccae68faee/12967_2025_6515_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7244/12063409/54826069915a/12967_2025_6515_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7244/12063409/5c2074f30dc8/12967_2025_6515_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7244/12063409/4eccae68faee/12967_2025_6515_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7244/12063409/54826069915a/12967_2025_6515_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7244/12063409/5c2074f30dc8/12967_2025_6515_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7244/12063409/4eccae68faee/12967_2025_6515_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Impact of personalised risk predictions on breast cancer risk perceptions: insights from the BREATHE study.个性化风险预测对乳腺癌风险认知的影响:BREATHE研究的见解
J Transl Med. 2025 May 8;23(1):517. doi: 10.1186/s12967-025-06515-1.
2
Health beliefs, illness perceptions and determinants of breast screening uptake in Malta: a cross-sectional survey.马耳他乳腺癌筛查接受情况的健康信念、疾病认知及决定因素:一项横断面调查。
BMC Public Health. 2017 May 8;17(1):416. doi: 10.1186/s12889-017-4324-6.
3
Breast cancer risk perceptions of Turkish women attending primary care: a cross-sectional study.参加初级保健的土耳其女性对乳腺癌风险的认知:一项横断面研究。
BMC Womens Health. 2014 Dec 5;14:152. doi: 10.1186/s12905-014-0152-3.
4
Shared decision-making for supporting women's decisions about breast cancer screening.支持女性进行乳腺癌筛查决策的共享决策。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 May 10;5(5):CD013822. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013822.pub2.
5
Perceptions of breast cancer risk after breast density notification in a population-based screening program.基于人群的筛查项目中乳腺密度告知后的乳腺癌风险认知
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2025 Jun;211(2):455-465. doi: 10.1007/s10549-025-07662-1. Epub 2025 Mar 6.
6
A model for predicting both breast cancer risk and non-breast cancer death among women > 55 years old.预测 55 岁以上女性乳腺癌风险和非乳腺癌死亡的模型。
Breast Cancer Res. 2023 Jan 24;25(1):8. doi: 10.1186/s13058-023-01605-8.
7
Predictors of Breast Cancer Worry in a Hispanic and Predominantly Immigrant Mammography Screening Population.西班牙裔及以移民为主的乳腺钼靶筛查人群中乳腺癌担忧情绪的预测因素
Womens Health Issues. 2017 Mar-Apr;27(2):237-244. doi: 10.1016/j.whi.2016.10.003. Epub 2016 Nov 15.
8
Saudi women's interest in breast cancer gene testing: possible influence of awareness, perceived risk and socio-demographic factors.沙特女性对乳腺癌基因检测的兴趣:认知、感知风险及社会人口学因素的潜在影响
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2012;13(8):3879-87. doi: 10.7314/apjcp.2012.13.8.3879.
9
A prospective study of perceived susceptibility to breast cancer and nonadherence to mammography screening guidelines in African American and White women ages 40 to 79 years.一项针对年龄在40至79岁的非裔美国女性和白人女性对乳腺癌易感性的认知以及对乳房X光检查筛查指南依从性的前瞻性研究。
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2004 Dec;13(12):2096-105.
10
Health belief model and practice of breast self-examination and breast cancer screening in Iranian women.伊朗女性的健康信念模式以及乳房自我检查和乳腺癌筛查实践
Breast Cancer. 2014 Jul;21(4):429-34. doi: 10.1007/s12282-012-0409-3. Epub 2012 Sep 19.

本文引用的文献

1
Socioeconomic and Geographic Differences in Mammography Trends Following the 2009 USPSTF Policy Update.2009年美国预防服务工作组(USPSTF)政策更新后乳房X光检查趋势中的社会经济和地理差异。
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Feb 3;8(2):e2458141. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.58141.
2
Validation of a clinical breast cancer risk assessment tool combining a polygenic score for all ancestries with traditional risk factors.验证一种结合了所有种族多基因评分和传统风险因素的临床乳腺癌风险评估工具。
Genet Med. 2024 Jul;26(7):101128. doi: 10.1016/j.gim.2024.101128. Epub 2024 Jun 3.
3
Systematic review and meta-analysis of prognostic characteristics for breast cancers in populations with digital vs film mammography indicate the transition may have increased both early detection and overdiagnosis.
系统回顾和荟萃分析显示,与数字化乳腺 X 光摄影相比,数字乳腺摄影可能增加了乳腺癌的早期检出率和过度诊断率。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2024 Jul;171:111339. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2024.111339. Epub 2024 Apr 2.
4
Screening behaviors of high-risk individuals for lung cancer: A cross-sectional study.肺癌高危个体的筛查行为:一项横断面研究。
Asia Pac J Oncol Nurs. 2024 Feb 10;11(4):100402. doi: 10.1016/j.apjon.2024.100402. eCollection 2024 Apr.
5
Estimation of age of onset and progression of breast cancer by absolute risk dependent on polygenic risk score and other risk factors.基于多基因风险评分和其他风险因素的绝对风险估计乳腺癌的发病年龄和进展。
Cancer. 2024 May 1;130(9):1590-1599. doi: 10.1002/cncr.35183. Epub 2024 Jan 4.
6
The Potential of Genetics in Identifying Women at Lower Risk of Breast Cancer.遗传学在识别低乳腺癌风险女性中的潜力。
JAMA Oncol. 2024 Feb 1;10(2):236-239. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2023.5468.
7
Estimated US Cancer Deaths Prevented With Increased Use of Lung, Colorectal, Breast, and Cervical Cancer Screening.增加使用肺癌、结直肠癌、乳腺癌和宫颈癌筛查可预防的美国估计癌症死亡人数。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Nov 1;6(11):e2344698. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.44698.
8
Quantitative estimates of preventable and treatable deaths from 36 cancers worldwide: a population-based study.全球 36 种癌症可预防和可治疗死亡的定量估计:一项基于人群的研究。
Lancet Glob Health. 2023 Nov;11(11):e1700-e1712. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(23)00406-0. Epub 2023 Sep 26.
9
Optimising recruitment to a lung cancer screening trial: A comparison of general practitioner and community-based recruitment.优化肺癌筛查试验的招募工作:全科医生与社区招募方式的比较
J Med Screen. 2024 Mar;31(1):46-52. doi: 10.1177/09691413231190785. Epub 2023 Aug 1.
10
Screening practices of cancer survivors and individuals whose family or friends had a cancer diagnoses-a nationally representative cross-sectional survey in Japan (INFORM Study 2020).癌症幸存者及其有癌症家族史或亲友的个体的筛查实践——日本全国代表性横断面调查(INFORM 研究 2020)。
J Cancer Surviv. 2023 Jun;17(3):663-676. doi: 10.1007/s11764-023-01367-4. Epub 2023 Apr 12.