Suppr超能文献

多民族亚洲人群中糖尿病并发症筛查的不依从性:一项混合方法前瞻性研究的方案

Nonadherence to Diabetes Complications Screening in a Multiethnic Asian Population: Protocol for a Mixed Methods Prospective Study.

作者信息

Aravindhan Amudha, Fenwick Eva, Wing Dan Chan Aurora, Eyn Kidd Man Ryan, Ee Tang Wern, Chuan Tan Ngiap, Sabanayagam Charumathi, Chay Junxing, Pui Ng Lok, Teen Wong Wei, Fern Soo Wern, Wei Lim Shin, Lamoureux Ecosse L

机构信息

Singapore Eye Research Institute, Singapore National Eye Centre, Singapore, Singapore.

Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, Singapore.

出版信息

JMIR Res Protoc. 2025 May 8;14:e63253. doi: 10.2196/63253.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Yearly screening for microvascular complications of diabetes mellitus (DM), namely diabetic retinopathy (DR), diabetic nephropathy (DN), and diabetic foot complications (DFC), is recommended to reduce their incidence, and delay or prevent their progression. Poor adherence to screening is common, but prospective data on the magnitude and predictors of nonadherence to DR, DN, and DFC screening in Singapore are unavailable.

OBJECTIVE

The Understanding Non-Adherence to Diabetes Complications Screening study aims to determine the rates, predictors, and clinical and economic impact of nonadherence to diabetic complications screening in patients with type 2 diabetes in Singapore. The study describes the methodology and participants' baseline characteristics that may be associated with nonadherence to DM complications screening.

METHODS

In this prospective, mixed methods, clinic-based study, patients who underwent DR, DN, or DFC screening and were offered an annual rescreening appointment, were recruited from 6 primary care centers. Patients' sociodemographic, medical, clinical, and patient-reported characteristics were recorded at baseline. Nonadherence to DR, DN, or DFC screening is defined as not attending the annual rescreening appointment within 4 months of the scheduled rescreening date. Adherence and clinical data will be recorded at 16 months post enrollment. Additionally, selected participants and health care professionals will undergo qualitative interviews to elicit barriers or facilitators of adherence to rescreening.

RESULTS

Ethical approval was obtained in November 2016. Study enrollment commenced across the 6 sites between June 2018 and February 2019, and baseline data collection ended at all sites in January 2020. 974 eligible patients (2123 screenings; median age of 61.0, IQR 55.0-67.0 years; male: 515, 52.9%; Chinese: 624, 64.1%) consented and completed the baseline assessment. Of these, 734 (75.4%), 603 (61.9%), and 786 (80.7%) attended DR, DN, and DFC screening, respectively. Most (n=793, 81.4%) attended more than 1 complication screening on the same day; had received secondary or lower education (n=701, 71.9%); had hypertension (n=711, 73.4%) and dyslipidemia (n=828, 85.1%); and 43.1% (n=419) were obese (BMI>27.5 kg/m). Median DM duration and hemoglobin A levels were 6.3 (IQR 3.0-12.0) years and 6.9% (6.4%-7.6%), respectively. Over half (n=532, 55.1%) had not received prior DM education. Furthermore, participants reported low levels of diabetes-related self-efficacy (median 1.4, IQR 1.0-3.9 out of 5).

CONCLUSIONS

At baseline, we have successfully enrolled almost 1000 patients with type 2 diabetes scheduled for annual DR, DN, or DFC rescreening, and potential predictors of nonadherence to rescreening were systematically collected. Follow-up phases will focus on establishing the rates and associated modifiable predictors of nonadherence to DR, DN, or DFC rescreening, which may inform program initiatives.

INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/63253.

摘要

背景

建议每年对糖尿病微血管并发症进行筛查,即糖尿病视网膜病变(DR)、糖尿病肾病(DN)和糖尿病足并发症(DFC),以降低其发病率,延缓或预防其进展。筛查依从性差很常见,但新加坡缺乏关于DR、DN和DFC筛查不依从程度及预测因素的前瞻性数据。

目的

“了解糖尿病并发症筛查不依从性”研究旨在确定新加坡2型糖尿病患者糖尿病并发症筛查不依从的发生率、预测因素以及临床和经济影响。该研究描述了可能与糖尿病并发症筛查不依从相关的方法和参与者的基线特征。

方法

在这项基于诊所的前瞻性混合方法研究中,从6个初级保健中心招募接受DR、DN或DFC筛查并获得年度复查预约的患者。在基线时记录患者的社会人口统计学、医疗、临床和患者报告的特征。DR、DN或DFC筛查不依从定义为在预定复查日期后4个月内未参加年度复查预约。在入组后16个月记录依从性和临床数据。此外,将对选定的参与者和医疗保健专业人员进行定性访谈,以找出复查依从性的障碍或促进因素。

结果

2016年11月获得伦理批准。2018年6月至2019年2月期间在6个地点开始研究入组,2020年1月所有地点结束基线数据收集。974名符合条件的患者(2123次筛查;中位年龄61.0岁,四分位距55.0 - 67.0岁;男性515名,占52.9%;华人624名,占64.1%)同意并完成了基线评估。其中,分别有734名(75.4%)、603名(61.9%)和786名(80.7%)参加了DR、DN和DFC筛查。大多数(n = 793,81.4%)在同一天参加了不止一项并发症筛查;接受过中等或以下教育(n = 701,71.9%);患有高血压(n = 711,73.4%)和血脂异常(n = 828,85.1%);43.1%(n = 419)肥胖(BMI>27.5 kg/m²)。糖尿病病程中位数和糖化血红蛋白水平分别为6.3(四分位距3.0 - 12.0)年和6.9%(6.4% - 7.6%)。超过一半(n = 532,55.1%)的患者之前未接受过糖尿病教育。此外,参与者报告糖尿病相关自我效能水平较低(中位数1.4,五分制中四分位距为1.0 - 3.9)。

结论

在基线时,我们成功招募了近1000名计划进行年度DR、DN或DFC复查的2型糖尿病患者,并系统收集了复查不依从的潜在预测因素。随访阶段将重点确定DR、DN或DFC复查不依从的发生率及相关可改变的预测因素,这可能为项目举措提供依据。

国际注册报告识别码(IRRID):DERR1-10.2196/63253。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b75/12099272/4ae92092658f/resprot_v14i1e63253_fig1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验