Reitsam Nic G, Offermans Kelly, Simons Colinda C J M, Grosser Bianca, Zimmermann Jessica, Grabsch Heike I, Märkl Bruno, van den Brandt Piet A
Pathology, Medical Faculty, University of Augsburg.
Bavarian Cancer Research Center (BZKF), Augsburg, Germany.
Am J Surg Pathol. 2025 May 9;49(9):956-969. doi: 10.1097/PAS.0000000000002408.
We recently proposed Stroma AReactive Invasion Front Areas (SARIFA), defined as direct tumor-adipocyte interaction at the invasion front, as a novel hematoxylin-and-eosin (H&E)-based histopathological prognostic biomarker in various cancers. Given that microsatellite instability, BRAF , and RAS mutation status are routinely tested for colorectal cancers (CRC), studying SARIFA's additional prognostic value within these molecular subgroups is crucial. In addition, exploring whether the survival benefit from adjuvant therapy differs according to SARIFA-status may enhance patient treatment and outcome. SARIFA-status, BRAF , RAS , and DNA mismatch repair (MMR) status were available for 1726 CRC patients from the prospective Netherlands Cohort Study (NLCS, 1986-2006). In this study, we investigated (1) the relationship between SARIFA-status and CRC molecular characteristics, (2) the prognostic value of SARIFA-status within these molecular subgroups, and (3) whether SARIFA-status was associated with survival benefit from adjuvant therapy. SARIFA-positive CRCs more frequently showed a BRAF mutation compared to SARIFA-negative CRCs ( P <0.001). BRAF -mutant/MMR-proficient CRCs were enriched in SARIFA-positive cases. SARIFA-positivity was associated with poor CRC-specific (HR range : 1.47 to 1.78) and overall survival (HR range : 1.35 to 1.70) within all molecular subgroups except MMR-deficient CRCs. Patients with SARIFA-positive CRC showed a CRC-specific survival benefit from adjuvant therapy compared to surgery alone (HR CRC-specific : 0.59; 95% CI: 0.44-0.79), while no CRC-specific survival benefit was observed for patients with SARIFA-negative CRC. To conclude, our results indicate that SARIFA-positivity is more common in the aggressive subset of BRAF -mutant and BRAF -mutant/MMR-proficient CRCs. Moreover, SARIFA-positivity provides additional prognostic value within molecular subgroups based on BRAF , RAS , and MMR status, suggesting that it may enhance prognostic stratification of CRC patients.
我们最近提出了基质反应性侵袭前沿区域(SARIFA),将其定义为侵袭前沿处肿瘤与脂肪细胞的直接相互作用,作为一种基于苏木精和伊红(H&E)染色的新型组织病理学预后生物标志物,用于多种癌症。鉴于微卫星不稳定性、BRAF和RAS突变状态在结直肠癌(CRC)中常规检测,研究SARIFA在这些分子亚组中的额外预后价值至关重要。此外,探索辅助治疗的生存获益是否因SARIFA状态而异,可能会改善患者的治疗和预后。来自前瞻性荷兰队列研究(NLCS,1986 - 2006)的1726例CRC患者的SARIFA状态、BRAF、RAS和DNA错配修复(MMR)状态数据可用。在本研究中,我们调查了:(1)SARIFA状态与CRC分子特征之间的关系;(2)SARIFA状态在这些分子亚组中的预后价值;(3)SARIFA状态是否与辅助治疗的生存获益相关。与SARIFA阴性的CRC相比,SARIFA阳性的CRC更频繁地出现BRAF突变(P<0.001)。BRAF突变/MMR proficient的CRC在SARIFA阳性病例中富集。除MMR缺陷的CRC外,在所有分子亚组中,SARIFA阳性与较差的CRC特异性生存(HR范围:1.47至1.78)和总生存(HR范围:1.35至1.70)相关。与单纯手术相比,SARIFA阳性的CRC患者从辅助治疗中获得了CRC特异性生存获益(HR CRC特异性:0.59;95%CI:0.44 - 0.79),而SARIFA阴性的CRC患者未观察到CRC特异性生存获益。总之,我们的结果表明,SARIFA阳性在BRAF突变和BRAF突变/MMR proficient的侵袭性CRC亚组中更常见。此外,SARIFA阳性在基于BRAF、RAS和MMR状态的分子亚组中提供了额外的预后价值,表明它可能增强CRC患者的预后分层。