Sweeney Jon, Gao Wentao, Gutowski Jerzy M, Hughes Cory, Kimoto Troy, Kostanowicz Chantelle, Li Yan, MacQuarrie Chris J K, Mayo Peter, Meng Qingfan, Mokrzycki Tomasz, Silk Peter, Webster Vincent, Miller Daniel R
Natural Resources Canada, Canadian Forest Service, Atlantic Forestry Centre, Fredericton, New Brunswick, Canada.
Forestry College of Beihua University, Jilin City, Jilin, P. R. China.
PLoS One. 2025 May 8;20(5):e0322412. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0322412. eCollection 2025.
Early detection of non-native, potentially invasive bark beetles and woodboring beetles (BBWB) (Coleoptera: Buprestidae, Cerambycidae, Disteniidae; Curculionidae: Scolytinae) inadvertently introduced to new habitats via global trade is a critical issue for regulatory agencies in numerous countries. We conducted trapping experiments to evaluate the effects of trap color (black vs. green vs. purple) and trap height (canopy vs. understory) on detection of BBWB in Canada, Poland, USA, and China, using Fluon-treated 12-unit multiple-funnel traps. Each trap was baited with the same pheromone and ethanol lures known to attract several species of BBWB. We predicted BBWB species composition would differ between vertical strata and among trap colors, and that the number of BBWB species detected would increase with greater diversity of trapping methods, i.e., by using more than one color of trap and by placing traps in both the canopy and understory. Our prediction was partially supported, i.e., placing one color of trap in the understory and a different colored trap in the canopy detected more species than did a single trap color placed in either the understory or canopy. However, the combinations of trap height and colors that detected the most species varied among sites. The community of BBWB species captured in traps was significantly affected by trap height and trap color at all sites, with the strongest patterns in the data from Poland and the USA. Black and purple traps caught similar communities of BBWB species in the canopy and understory, but green traps caught a different species assemblage in the canopy in Poland and the USA. Effects of trap height and color on species richness were consistent across all four sites within the subfamilies Agrilinae (more species captured in green canopy traps than any other trap height-color combination), Chrysochroinae (more species captured in purple canopy traps than any trap height-color combination) and Scolytinae (more species captured in the understory than the canopy and no effect of trap color), but varied significantly among sites within Cerambycidae subfamilies. None of the species accumulation curves reached an asymptote for any trap color-height combination at any site, indicating that 8-9 traps per site were not sufficient to detect all BBWB species present. Thus, increasing the number of traps deployed per site will increase the BBWB species richness captured and the chances of detecting non-native species that may be present.
通过全球贸易无意间引入新栖息地的非本地、具有潜在入侵性的树皮甲虫和蛀木甲虫(BBWB)(鞘翅目:吉丁甲科、天牛科、长小蠹科;象甲科:小蠹亚科)的早期检测,是许多国家监管机构面临的关键问题。我们进行了诱捕实验,以评估诱捕器颜色(黑色、绿色、紫色)和诱捕器高度(树冠层、林下植被层)对在加拿大、波兰、美国和中国检测BBWB的影响,使用涂有氟化物的12单元多漏斗诱捕器。每个诱捕器都用已知能吸引多种BBWB的相同信息素和乙醇诱饵进行诱捕。我们预测,BBWB的物种组成在垂直层次之间以及诱捕器颜色之间会有所不同,并且检测到的BBWB物种数量会随着诱捕方法的多样性增加而增加,即使用多种颜色的诱捕器并将诱捕器放置在树冠层和林下植被层。我们的预测得到了部分支持,即在林下植被层放置一种颜色的诱捕器,在树冠层放置另一种颜色的诱捕器,比在林下植被层或树冠层单独放置一种颜色的诱捕器能检测到更多物种。然而,检测到最多物种的诱捕器高度和颜色组合在不同地点有所不同。在所有地点,诱捕器中捕获的BBWB物种群落都受到诱捕器高度和诱捕器颜色的显著影响,波兰和美国的数据中模式最为明显。黑色和紫色诱捕器在树冠层和林下植被层捕获的BBWB物种群落相似,但在波兰和美国,绿色诱捕器在树冠层捕获的物种组合不同。诱捕器高度和颜色对物种丰富度的影响在Agrilinae亚科(绿色树冠层诱捕器捕获的物种比任何其他诱捕器高度 - 颜色组合都多)、Chrysochroinae亚科(紫色树冠层诱捕器捕获的物种比任何诱捕器高度 - 颜色组合都多)和Scolytinae亚科(林下植被层捕获的物种比树冠层多且诱捕器颜色无影响)的所有四个地点都是一致的,但在天牛科亚科的不同地点之间差异显著。在任何地点,对于任何诱捕器颜色 - 高度组合,没有一个物种积累曲线达到渐近线,这表明每个地点8 - 9个诱捕器不足以检测到所有存在的BBWB物种。因此,增加每个地点部署的诱捕器数量将增加捕获的BBWB物种丰富度以及检测到可能存在的非本地物种的机会。