Suppr超能文献

最大限度地提高陷阱调查中树皮甲虫和天牛(鞘翅目:天牛科)的捕获量,以调查长角和宝石甲虫。

Maximizing Bark and Ambrosia Beetle (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) Catches in Trapping Surveys for Longhorn and Jewel Beetles.

机构信息

Department of Agronomy, Food, Natural Resources, Animals and Environment (DAFNAE), University of Padova, Legnaro (Padova), Italy.

Natural Resources Canada, Canadian Forest Service - Atlantic Forestry Centre, Fredericton, New Brunswick, Canada.

出版信息

J Econ Entomol. 2020 Dec 9;113(6):2745-2757. doi: 10.1093/jee/toaa181.

Abstract

Bark and ambrosia beetles are commonly moved among continents within timber and fresh wood-packaging materials. Routine visual inspections of imported commodities are often complemented with baited traps set up in natural areas surrounding entry points. Given that these activities can be expensive, trapping protocols that attract multiple species simultaneously are needed. Here we investigated whether trapping protocols commonly used to detect longhorn beetles (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae) and jewel beetles (Coleoptera: Buprestidae) can be exploited also for detecting bark and ambrosia beetles. In factorial experiments conducted in 2016 both in Italy (seminatural and reforested forests) and Canada (mixed forest) we tested the effect of trap color (green vs purple), trap height (understory vs canopy), and attractive blend (hardwood-blend developed for broadleaf-associated wood-boring beetles vs ethanol in Italy; hardwood-blend vs softwood-blend developed for conifer-associated wood-boring beetles, in Canada) separately on bark beetles and ambrosia beetles, as well as on individual bark and ambrosia beetle species. Trap color affected catch of ambrosia beetles more so than bark beetles, with purple traps generally more attractive than green traps. Trap height affected both beetle groups, with understory traps generally performing better than canopy traps. Hardwood-blend and ethanol performed almost equally in attracting ambrosia beetles in Italy, whereas hardwood-blend and softwood-blend were more attractive to broadleaf-associated species and conifer-associated species, respectively, in Canada. In general, we showed that trapping variables suitable for generic surveillance of longhorn and jewel beetles may also be exploited for survey of bark and ambrosia beetles, but trapping protocols must be adjusted depending on the forest type.

摘要

树皮和粉蠹甲虫通常在木材和新鲜木质包装材料中在各大洲之间移动。对进口商品的例行目视检查通常辅以在入境点周围的自然区域设置的诱捕器。鉴于这些活动可能很昂贵,因此需要同时吸引多种物种的诱捕协议。在这里,我们研究了用于检测长角甲虫(鞘翅目:天牛科)和宝石甲虫(鞘翅目:金龟科)的诱捕协议是否也可用于检测树皮和粉蠹甲虫。在 2016 年在意大利(半自然和重新造林的森林)和加拿大(混合林)进行的析因实验中,我们测试了诱捕器颜色(绿色与紫色)、诱捕器高度(林下与树冠)和有吸引力的混合物(为阔叶相关蛀木甲虫开发的硬木混合物与在意大利的乙醇;为针叶树相关蛀木甲虫开发的硬木混合物与软木混合物,在加拿大)分别对树皮甲虫和粉蠹甲虫以及单个树皮和粉蠹甲虫物种的影响。诱捕器颜色对粉蠹甲虫的捕获影响大于对树皮甲虫的影响,紫色诱捕器通常比绿色诱捕器更具吸引力。诱捕器高度影响了这两个甲虫群体,林下诱捕器的性能通常优于树冠诱捕器。在意大利,硬木混合物和乙醇对粉蠹甲虫的吸引力几乎相等,而在加拿大,硬木混合物和软木混合物分别对阔叶相关物种和针叶树相关物种更具吸引力。总体而言,我们表明,适合通用监测长角和宝石甲虫的诱捕变量也可用于调查树皮和粉蠹甲虫,但诱捕协议必须根据森林类型进行调整。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验