Dogra Manpriya, Jaggi Surabhi, Kaur Komaldeep, Bhatia Chahat, Aggarwal Deepak, Saini Varinder
Department of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, Government Medical College and Hospital, Chandigarh, India.
Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Indira Gandhi Medical College, Shimla, Himachal Pradesh, India.
Int J Appl Basic Med Res. 2025 Apr-Jun;15(2):116-121. doi: 10.4103/ijabmr.ijabmr_557_24. Epub 2025 Apr 7.
Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a common sleep-breathing disorder. OSA is becoming highly prevalent, which means that to detect and prevent various hazardous complications, it is imperative that there are easy yet accurate techniques available to identify people with OSA.
The objective was to compare two questionnaires: The STOP-BANG score and the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS), used to screen the patients suspected of OSA. Polysomnography (PSG), the gold standard investigation, was used to diagnose OSA.
Sixty-five suspected individuals were recruited as per inclusion/exclusion criteria. Detailed history taking, physical examination, and anthropometric examination were done in all patients. Suspects were subjected to filling up of the STOP-BANG and ESS questionnaires, following which they underwent an overnight PSG examination, which is considered the gold standard diagnostic investigation for OSA. Compiled data were used to compare the sensitivities, specificities, and positive and negative predictive values (NPVs) of the two screening scores.
Of 65 screened patients, 57 (88%) had OSA. The sensitivity to predict OSA was the highest for the STOP-BANG questionnaire (91.23%), whereas ESS had a sensitivity of 70.18%. No difference in specificity (75%) of the two scores was noted. The positive predictive values of STOP-BANG and ESS questionnaires was 96.30% and 95.20%, respectively. NPV of STOP-BANG and ESS was 54.50% and 26.10%, respectively.
The present study was able to provide valuable insights into OSA screening. Out of the two studied OSA screening questionnaires, we found out that both had comparatively good predictive and diagnostic accuracy, with the STOP-BANG score surpassing the ESS score in the majority of measures. Considering the high global burden of undiagnosed OSA, there is a need to upregulate the screening for OSA followed by appropriate treatment measures. This would improve sleep quality and reduce the risk of complications and future adverse health outcomes.
阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停(OSA)是一种常见的睡眠呼吸障碍。OSA的患病率正变得越来越高,这意味着为了检测和预防各种危险并发症,必须有简单而准确的技术来识别OSA患者。
目的是比较两种问卷:用于筛查疑似OSA患者的STOP-BANG评分和Epworth嗜睡量表(ESS)。多导睡眠图(PSG)作为金标准检查,用于诊断OSA。
根据纳入/排除标准招募了65名疑似个体。对所有患者进行了详细的病史采集、体格检查和人体测量检查。让疑似患者填写STOP-BANG和ESS问卷,之后他们接受了整夜的PSG检查,这被认为是OSA的金标准诊断检查。汇总的数据用于比较两种筛查评分的敏感性、特异性以及阳性和阴性预测值(NPV)。
在65名接受筛查的患者中,57名(88%)患有OSA。STOP-BANG问卷预测OSA的敏感性最高(91.23%),而ESS的敏感性为70.18%。两种评分的特异性(75%)没有差异。STOP-BANG和ESS问卷的阳性预测值分别为96.3%和95.2%。STOP-BANG和ESS的NPV分别为54.5%和26.1%。
本研究能够为OSA筛查提供有价值的见解。在两种研究的OSA筛查问卷中,我们发现两者都具有相对较好的预测和诊断准确性,在大多数指标上STOP-BANG评分超过了ESS评分。鉴于未诊断的OSA在全球的高负担,有必要加强OSA的筛查并采取适当的治疗措施。这将改善睡眠质量,降低并发症风险和未来不良健康结局。