• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

The Frontier V Study: Evaluating the Safety and Clinical Performance of a Large-Bore Vascular Closure Device After Femoral Arterial Access.

作者信息

Frerker Christian, Schwindt Arne, Schmidt Andrej, Schmidt Tobias, Bonnet Guillaume, Branzan Daniela, Leroux Lionel, Van Mieghem Nicolas M, Panoulas Vasileios, Martin Christopher, Gatto Fernando

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, University Hospital of Schleswig-Holstein, Lübeck, Germany.

German Center for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Partner Site Hamburg-Kiel-Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany.

出版信息

Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2025 Jul;106(1):521-526. doi: 10.1002/ccd.31574. Epub 2025 May 7.

DOI:10.1002/ccd.31574
PMID:40343429
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Vascular complications following large-bore procedures may have a significant impact on patient morbidity and mortality, highlighting the critical need for an effective, safe, and reproducible closure device. We present our prospective multi-center experience with a novel patch-based closure device.

AIM

To evaluate the safety and clinical performance of the PerQseal+ closure system in achieving hemostasis after femoral arterial large-bore access with 14-22 F sheaths.

METHODS

The Frontier V study (NCT04799769) is a multicenter study that included patients undergoing an endovascular procedure requiring femoral access created by 14-22 F sheaths. The primary safety outcome was major access site complications related to the PerQseal+. The primary efficacy outcome was the technical success rate of device deployment. Secondary outcomes included minor access site complications related to the device, time to hemostasia, time to deployment, and time to total closure.

RESULTS

A total of 88 subjects were included at seven investigational centers in Europe. One device-related major access site complication (i.e., retroperitoneal hematoma) occurred (1.1%). The acute success rate of device deployment was 95%. There were five minor vascular access site complications directly related to the device (5.7%). The median time of device deployment was 5 min, the median time to achieve hemostasia was 1 min, and the median total closure time was 6 min.

CONCLUSION

The PerQseal+ closure device was safe and effective for large-bore arterial femoral closure. These results highlight its potential as a reliable alternative for large-bore closure in endovascular procedures.

摘要

相似文献

1
The Frontier V Study: Evaluating the Safety and Clinical Performance of a Large-Bore Vascular Closure Device After Femoral Arterial Access.
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2025 Jul;106(1):521-526. doi: 10.1002/ccd.31574. Epub 2025 May 7.
2
Safety and Efficacy of a Plug-Based Vascular Closure Device After Percutaneous Microaxial Flow Pump in the Treatment of Complex and High-Risk Indicated Patients.经皮微轴流泵治疗复杂高危适应症患者后,基于封堵器的血管闭合装置的安全性和有效性。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2025 Jul;106(1):189-195. doi: 10.1002/ccd.31528. Epub 2025 Apr 10.
3
Vascular Closure Devices For Axillary Artery Access: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.血管闭合装置在腋动脉入路中的应用:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Endovasc Ther. 2024 Oct;31(5):763-771. doi: 10.1177/15266028221147451. Epub 2023 Jan 10.
4
Vascular Closure Devices for Large Bore Femoral Access After Transfemoral Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: A Network Meta-Analysis.经股动脉导管主动脉瓣置换术后大口径股动脉通路的血管闭合装置:一项网状Meta分析
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2025 Jul;106(1):423-432. doi: 10.1002/ccd.31565. Epub 2025 Apr 27.
5
Ultrasound-guided versus anatomic landmark-guided percutaneous femoral artery access.超声引导与解剖标志引导下经皮股动脉穿刺入路
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Mar 28;3(3):CD014594. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014594.pub2.
6
A systematic literature review of the efficacy and safety of the Prostar XL device for the closure of large femoral arterial access sites in patients undergoing percutaneous endovascular aortic procedures.经皮腔内主动脉手术中使用 Prostar XL 装置闭合大股动脉入路部位的疗效和安全性的系统文献回顾。
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2011 Feb;41(2):201-13. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2010.10.015. Epub 2010 Dec 8.
7
Vascular closure devices for femoral arterial puncture site haemostasis.用于股动脉穿刺部位止血的血管闭合装置。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Mar 7;3(3):CD009541. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009541.pub2.
8
Editor's Choice - Arteriotomy Closure Devices in EVAR, TEVAR, and TAVR: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomised Clinical Trials and Cohort Studies.编辑推荐——腹主动脉瘤腔内修复术、胸主动脉腔内修复术和经导管主动脉瓣置换术中的动脉切开闭合装置:一项对随机临床试验和队列研究的系统评价与荟萃分析
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2017 Jul;54(1):104-115. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2017.03.015. Epub 2017 Apr 21.
9
Totally percutaneous versus surgical cut-down femoral artery access for elective bifurcated abdominal endovascular aneurysm repair.经皮与外科切开股动脉入路在择期分叉腹主动脉血管内修复术中的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Jan 11;1(1):CD010185. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010185.pub4.
10
A systematic review of vascular closure devices for femoral artery puncture sites.经股动脉穿刺部位血管闭合装置的系统评价
J Vasc Surg. 2018 Sep;68(3):887-899. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2018.05.019. Epub 2018 Jun 29.