Tatsuno Yuya, Mukumoto Naritoshi, Ishida Tomoya, Shimizu Yasuyuki, Yamamoto Yoshihiko, Seno Satoshi, Ishihara Takeaki, Miyawaki Daisuke, Sasaki Ryohei
Department of Radiation Oncology, Kobe University Hospital, 7-5-2 Kusunoki-cho, Chuo-ku, Kobe, Hyogo, 650-0017, Japan.
Center for Radiology and Oncology, Kobe University Hospital, 7-5-2 Kusunoki-cho, Chuo-ku, Kobe, Hyogo, 650-0017, Japan.
Radiol Phys Technol. 2025 Jun;18(2):547-555. doi: 10.1007/s12194-025-00907-0. Epub 2025 May 9.
In lung stereotactic body radiation therapy, optimizing plan quality, including dosimetric quality and plan complexity, is paramount for mitigating adverse effects and enhancing dose delivery accuracy. This study evaluated the plan quality of dynamic conformal arc-based volumetric-modulated arc therapy (d-VMAT) as a simplified VMAT compared to conventional VMAT (c-VMAT) across various prescription isodose lines (PIL) and planning target volume (PTV) sizes. Twenty inoperable non-small cell lung cancer patients were retrospectively analyzed (PTV: 7.6-68.7 cm). The prescribed dose comprised 48 Gy delivered in four fractions, encompassing 95% of the PTV, with the PIL ranging from 60 to 90% in 10% increments, using a 6X-flattening filter-free beam. The d-VMAT and c-VMAT plans were generated for each patient and PIL setting. Dose indices, including the conformity index (CI), gradient index (GI), and plan complexity, were assessed for each plan. The GI of d-VMAT closely mirrored that of c-VMAT at 60% and 70% PIL. Nevertheless, d-VMAT exhibited significantly higher GI values than c-VMAT at 80% and 90% PIL, particularly for smaller PTV sizes. Notably, d-VMAT demonstrated reduced plan complexity across all PIL compared to c-VMAT. Clinically, significant differences in CI and dose coverage between d-VMAT and c-VMAT were not observed across varying PIL settings in the range of 60-80%. The dose to the organs at risk with d-VMAT was comparable to that with c-VMAT, except at 90% PIL. In conclusion, the simplification of VMAT treatment plan using d-VMAT demonstrates superior plan quality across various PTV sizes at 60% and 70% PIL.
在肺部立体定向体部放射治疗中,优化计划质量,包括剂量学质量和计划复杂性,对于减轻不良反应和提高剂量递送准确性至关重要。本研究评估了基于动态适形弧的容积调强弧光治疗(d-VMAT)作为一种简化的容积调强放疗(VMAT)与传统VMAT(c-VMAT)相比,在不同处方等剂量线(PIL)和计划靶区体积(PTV)大小情况下的计划质量。对20例无法手术的非小细胞肺癌患者进行了回顾性分析(PTV:7.6 - 68.7 cm³)。处方剂量为分4次给予48 Gy,覆盖95%的PTV,PIL范围为60%至90%,以10%的增量递增,使用6X无 flattening 滤过器的射束。为每位患者和每个PIL设置生成d-VMAT和c-VMAT计划。评估每个计划的剂量指标,包括适形指数(CI)、梯度指数(GI)和计划复杂性。在60%和70%的PIL时,d-VMAT的GI与c-VMAT相近。然而,在80%和90%的PIL时,d-VMAT的GI值显著高于c-VMAT,尤其是对于较小的PTV大小。值得注意的是,与c-VMAT相比,d-VMAT在所有PIL时计划复杂性均降低。临床上,在60%至80%范围内的不同PIL设置中,未观察到d-VMAT和c-VMAT在CI和剂量覆盖方面的显著差异。除了在90%的PIL时,d-VMAT对危及器官的剂量与c-VMAT相当。总之,使用d-VMAT简化VMAT治疗计划在60%和70%的PIL时,在各种PTV大小情况下均显示出卓越的计划质量。