Sample selection bias due to omitting short trees for tree height estimation in forest inventories: A case study on Pinus koraiensis plantations in South Korea.

This study investigates the impact of omitting short tree data on tree height estimation in conventional forest inventories, focusing on Pinus koraiensis plantations in South Korea. Twenty height-diameter models were tested on both datasets: the complete data and the short tree-free data. The models were divided into Group 1 (with two model parameters) and Group 2 (with three model parameters) to examine whether the omission of short tree data affects model performance based on the number of parameters. Results demonstrated that excluding short tree data led to significant overestimation of tree height in small diameter ranges, with Group 2 models showing greater sensitivity to the omission. This omission also caused substantial variations in model rankings between the Full and short tree-free datasets, leading to specification errors and suboptimal model selection. Despite the small sample size difference, half of the Group 2 models produced non-significant parameter estimates when fitted to the short tree-free data, underscoring the influence of sample distribution on statistical outcomes. While most models maintained consistent height-diameter relationships during extrapolation, some generated unrealistic results, including negative or excessively large tree height estimates and inverse relationships in small diameter ranges. These findings emphasize the necessity of including short trees in forest inventory samples to mitigate biases in tree height estimation, which is critical for accurate biomass and carbon stock assessments.