Dunbar Peter J, Peterson Ryan A, McGrath Max, Kiser Tyree H, Ho P Michael, Vandivier R William, Burnham Ellen L, Moss Marc, Sottile Peter D
Division of Pulmonary Sciences and Critical Care Medicine.
Department of Biostatistics and Informatics, Colorado School of Public Health, and.
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2025 Sep;22(9):1394-1400. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.202411-1225OC.
Neuromuscular blockade (NMB) is frequently used during acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) to improve ventilator synchrony. Which sedating medications are used concomitantly during NMB and whether sedation choice influences patient outcomes are unclear. To determine national sedation practice patterns during NMB in patients with and at risk for ARDS and to establish whether the use of propofol and opioids compared with benzodiazepines and opioids is associated with improved outcomes. Using a U.S. national database from 2010 to 2021, intubated and mechanically ventilated patients receiving NMB for a diagnosis of ARDS or an ARDS risk factor over at least two hospital days after admission were included. Charges for sedation and analgesia during the first two hospital days were recorded for each patient. The relationships between propofol and opioids and between benzodiazepines and opioids, with a primary outcome of ventilator-free days, as well as secondary outcomes of 28-day survival and discharge home were examined in multivariable analyses. We determined that the use of propofol has increased compared with that of benzodiazepines as the primary sedative used during NMB for ARDS. Compared with benzodiazepine and opioid use, propofol and opioid use during NMB for ARDS was associated with increased ventilator-free days (adjusted odds ratio, 1.38 [95% confidence interval, 1.24-1.54]), greater odds for survival at 28 days (adjusted odds ratio, 1.15 [95% confidence interval, 1.01-1.31]), and greater odds for discharge home (adjusted odds ratio, 1.26 [95% confidence interval, 1.09-1.46]), adjusting for patient-level and hospital-level characteristics. From 2010 to 2021, sedation practice during NMB for ARDS shifted from predominately benzodiazepine use to predominately propofol use. The use of propofol and opioids is associated with an increase in ventilator-free days compared with the use of benzodiazepines and opioids. These results suggest that sedation choice during NMB for ARDS may affect clinical outcomes; further investigation is needed to validate these findings.
在急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)期间,经常使用神经肌肉阻滞剂(NMB)来改善呼吸机同步性。在使用NMB期间同时使用哪些镇静药物以及镇静药物的选择是否会影响患者预后尚不清楚。为了确定ARDS患者及有ARDS风险的患者在使用NMB期间的全国镇静实践模式,并确定与苯二氮䓬类药物和阿片类药物相比,使用丙泊酚和阿片类药物是否与更好的预后相关。利用2010年至2021年的美国国家数据库,纳入了因诊断为ARDS或存在ARDS风险因素而在入院后至少两个住院日接受NMB的插管和机械通气患者。记录了每位患者前两个住院日的镇静和镇痛费用。在多变量分析中,研究了丙泊酚与阿片类药物之间以及苯二氮䓬类药物与阿片类药物之间的关系,主要结局为无呼吸机天数,次要结局为28天生存率和出院回家情况。我们确定,与苯二氮䓬类药物相比,在ARDS患者使用NMB期间作为主要镇静药物的丙泊酚的使用有所增加。与使用苯二氮䓬类药物和阿片类药物相比,在ARDS患者使用NMB期间使用丙泊酚和阿片类药物与无呼吸机天数增加相关(调整后的优势比为1.38 [95%置信区间为1.24 - 1.54]),28天生存率更高(调整后的优势比为1.15 [95%置信区间为1.01 - 1.31]),出院回家的几率更高(调整后的优势比为1.26 [95%置信区间为1.09 - 1.46]),并对患者层面和医院层面的特征进行了调整。从2010年到2021年,ARDS患者在使用NMB期间的镇静实践从主要使用苯二氮䓬类药物转变为主要使用丙泊酚。与使用苯二氮䓬类药物和阿片类药物相比,使用丙泊酚和阿片类药物与无呼吸机天数增加相关。这些结果表明,ARDS患者在使用NMB期间的镇静药物选择可能会影响临床结局;需要进一步研究来验证这些发现。