Chan Jia En, Shanmugham Suresh, Kumar Suresh, Lee Yeong Yeh, Ching Siew Mooi, Chaiyakunapruk Nathorn, Veettil Sajesh K
Department of Pharmacy Practice, School of Pharmacy, IMU University, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
School of Medical Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Kota Bharu, Malaysia.
Clin Transl Sci. 2025 May;18(5):e70235. doi: 10.1111/cts.70235.
Several meta-analyses have investigated the association between chemopreventive agents (CPAs) and the risk of gastrointestinal cancers, but syntheses of the quality of evidence in aggregate are lacking. This umbrella review aimed to assess the quality of evidence from meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and cohort studies that examine inverse associations between CPAs and the risk of gastrointestinal cancers or any premalignant conditions. Summary effect sizes from random-effects models, between-study heterogeneity, 95% prediction interval, small-study effect, excess significance, and credibility ceilings were devised to classify the credibility of evidence from meta-analyses of cohort studies, whereas the GRADE approach was used for meta-analyses of RCTs. From 20,296 publications, 577 full-text articles were evaluated for eligibility, and 69 articles that provided 194 unique meta-analyses were included. Among meta-analyses of RCTs (N = 93), 26 reached statistical significance (p < 0.05). Seven inverse associations were graded as either high quality (celecoxib and colorectal adenomas, (N = 4)) or moderate (aspirin and colorectal adenomas, (N = 2) and H-pylori eradication and gastric cancer (N = 1)). Among meta-analyses of cohort studies (N = 101), 60 reached statistical significance. Four inverse associations were graded as either convincing (antivirals with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC); N = 1) or highly suggestive (aspirin with HCC (N = 2) and colorectal cancer (N = 1)). This review suggests that the associations with the most consistent empirical evidence were confined to those targeting the well-established risk factors of gastrointestinal cancer progression. Despite the limited established evidence, the inverse associations observed between metformin and colorectal, esophageal, and gastric cancers, as well as between statins and HCC and gastric cancer, merit further research.
多项荟萃分析研究了化学预防剂(CPA)与胃肠道癌症风险之间的关联,但缺乏对总体证据质量的综合分析。本伞状综述旨在评估随机对照试验(RCT)和队列研究的荟萃分析中的证据质量,这些研究考察了CPA与胃肠道癌症或任何癌前病变之间的负相关关系。采用随机效应模型的汇总效应量、研究间异质性、95%预测区间、小研究效应、过度显著性和可信度上限来对队列研究荟萃分析的证据可信度进行分类,而GRADE方法则用于RCT的荟萃分析。从20296篇出版物中,评估了577篇全文文章的 eligibility,纳入了69篇提供194项独特荟萃分析的文章。在RCT的荟萃分析(N = 93)中,26项达到统计学显著性(p < 0.05)。七项负相关关系被评为高质量(塞来昔布与结直肠腺瘤,(N = 4))或中等质量(阿司匹林与结直肠腺瘤,(N = 2)以及幽门螺杆菌根除与胃癌(N = 1))。在队列研究的荟萃分析(N = 101)中,60项达到统计学显著性。四项负相关关系被评为令人信服(抗病毒药物与肝细胞癌(HCC);N = 1)或高度提示(阿司匹林与HCC(N = 2)以及结直肠癌(N = 1))。本综述表明,具有最一致实证证据的关联仅限于针对胃肠道癌症进展中已明确的危险因素的那些关联。尽管现有证据有限,但二甲双胍与结直肠癌、食管癌和胃癌之间以及他汀类药物与HCC和胃癌之间观察到的负相关关系值得进一步研究。