Evaluation of the Impact of Mobile Health App Vitadio in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes: Randomized Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND

Effective diabetes management requires a multimodal approach involving lifestyle changes, pharmacological treatment, and continuous patient education. Self-management demands can be overwhelming for patients, leading to lowered motivation, poor adherence, and compromised therapeutic outcomes. In this context, digital health apps are emerging as vital tools to provide personalized support and enhance diabetes management and clinical outcomes.

OBJECTIVE

This study evaluated the impact of the digital health application Vitadio on glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Secondary objectives included evaluating its effects on cardiometabolic parameters (weight, BMI, waist circumference, blood pressure, and heart rate) and self-reported measures of diabetes distress and self-management.

METHODS

In this 6-month, 2-arm, multicenter, unblinded randomized controlled trial, patients aged 18 years or older diagnosed with T2DM were randomly assigned (1:1) to an intervention group (IG) receiving standard diabetes care reinforced by the digital health app Vitadio or to a control group (CG) provided solely with standard diabetes care. Vitadio provided a mobile-based self-management support tool featuring educational modules, motivational messages, peer support, personalized goal setting, and health monitoring. The personal consultant was available in the app to provide technical support for app-related issues. The primary outcome, assessed in the intention-to-treat population, was a change in glycated hemoglobin (HbA) levels at 6 months. Secondary outcomes included changes in cardiometabolic measures and self-reported outcomes. Data were collected in 2 study centers: diabetologist practice in Dessau-Roßlau and the University of Dresden.

RESULTS

Between November 2022 and June 2023, a total of 276 patients were screened for eligibility, with 149 randomized to in intervention group (IG; n=73) and a control group (CG; n=76). The majority of participants were male (91/149, 61%). The dropout rate at month 6 was 19% (121/149). While both groups achieved significant HbA reduction at 6 months (IG: mean -0.8, SD 0.9%, P<.001; CG: mean -0.3, SD 0.7%, P=.001), the primary confirmatory analysis revealed statistically significant advantage of the IG (adjusted mean difference: -0.53%, SD 0.15, 95% CI -0.24 to -0.82; P<.001; effect size [Cohen d]=0.67, 95% CI 0.33-1). Significant between-group differences in favor of the IG were also observed for weight loss (P=.002), BMI (P=.001) and systolic blood pressure (P<.03). In addition, Vitadio users experienced greater reduction in diabetes-related distress (P<.03) and obtained more pronounced improvements in self-care practices in the areas of general diet (P<.001), specific diet (P<.03), and exercise (P<.03).

CONCLUSIONS

This trial provides evidence for the superior efficacy of Vitadio in lowering the HbA levels in T2DM patients compared to standard care. In addition, Vitadio contributed to improvements in cardiometabolic health, reduced diabetes-related distress, and enhanced self-management, highlighting its potential as an accessible digital tool for comprehensive diabetes management.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

German Clinical Trials Registry DRKS00027405; https://drks.de/search/de/trial/DRKS00027405.