• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

数字治疗干预与强化肥胖管理项目的比较:随机对照试验。

Comparing Digital Therapeutic Intervention with an Intensive Obesity Management Program: Randomized Controlled Trial.

机构信息

Department of Exercise Medicine and Cardiovascular Rehabilitation, University Hospital Olomouc, I. P. Pavlova 6, 779 00 Olomouc, Czech Republic.

Department of Health, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Kamenice 5, 625 00 Brno, Czech Republic.

出版信息

Nutrients. 2022 May 10;14(10):2005. doi: 10.3390/nu14102005.

DOI:10.3390/nu14102005
PMID:35631145
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9143861/
Abstract

In this study, we evaluated whether the digital program Vitadio achieves comparable results to those of an intensive in-person lifestyle intervention in obesity management. This is a 12-month prospective, randomized controlled trial. Obese patients with insulin resistance, prediabetes or type 2 diabetes were included. The intervention group (IG) used Vitadio. The control group (CG) received a series of in-person consultations. Body weight and various metabolic parameters were observed and analyzed with ANOVA. The trial is ongoing and the presented findings are preliminary. Among 100 participants (29% men; mean age, 43 years; mean BMI, 40.1 kg/m2), 78 completed 3-month follow-up, and 51 have completed the 6-month follow-up so far. Participants significantly (p < 0.01) reduced body weight at 3 months (IG: −5.9 ± 5.0%; CG: −4.2 ± 5.0%) and 6 months (IG: −6.6±6.1%; CG: −7.1 ± 7.1%), and the difference between groups was not significant. The IG achieved favorable change in body composition; significant improvement in TAG (−0.6 ± 0.9 mmol/l, p < 0.01), HDL (0.1 ± 0.1%, p < 0.05), HbA1c (−0.2 ± 0.5%, p < 0.05) and FG (−0.5 ± 1.5 mmol/l, p < 0.05); and a superior (p = 0.02) HOMA-IR reduction (−2.5 ± 5.2, p < 0.01). The digital intervention achieved comparable results to those of the intensive obesity management program. The results suggest that Vitadio is an effective tool for supporting patients in obesity management and diabetes prevention.

摘要

在这项研究中,我们评估了数字程序 Vitadio 在肥胖管理中的效果是否可与强化的面对面生活方式干预相媲美。这是一项为期 12 个月的前瞻性、随机对照试验。纳入了伴有胰岛素抵抗、前驱糖尿病或 2 型糖尿病的肥胖患者。干预组(IG)使用 Vitadio,对照组(CG)接受一系列面对面咨询。使用 ANOVA 观察和分析体重和各种代谢参数。该试验正在进行中,目前的结果是初步的。在 100 名参与者中(29%为男性;平均年龄 43 岁;平均 BMI 为 40.1kg/m2),78 人完成了 3 个月随访,51 人迄今完成了 6 个月随访。参与者体重在 3 个月(IG:−5.9 ± 5.0%;CG:−4.2 ± 5.0%)和 6 个月(IG:−6.6±6.1%;CG:−7.1 ± 7.1%)时显著下降(p < 0.01),组间差异无统计学意义。IG 实现了身体成分的有利变化;TAG(−0.6 ± 0.9mmol/l,p < 0.01)、HDL(0.1 ± 0.1%,p < 0.05)、HbA1c(−0.2 ± 0.5%,p < 0.05)和 FG(−0.5 ± 1.5mmol/l,p < 0.05)显著改善;HOMA-IR 降低更显著(−2.5 ± 5.2,p < 0.01)。数字干预与强化肥胖管理方案取得了可比的效果。结果表明,Vitadio 是支持肥胖症患者管理和预防糖尿病的有效工具。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/403d/9143861/d9e3d7a83a12/nutrients-14-02005-g0A4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/403d/9143861/20b2985a6662/nutrients-14-02005-g0A1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/403d/9143861/9d9ef5276562/nutrients-14-02005-g0A2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/403d/9143861/5d2021371eee/nutrients-14-02005-g0A3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/403d/9143861/d9e3d7a83a12/nutrients-14-02005-g0A4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/403d/9143861/20b2985a6662/nutrients-14-02005-g0A1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/403d/9143861/9d9ef5276562/nutrients-14-02005-g0A2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/403d/9143861/5d2021371eee/nutrients-14-02005-g0A3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/403d/9143861/d9e3d7a83a12/nutrients-14-02005-g0A4.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparing Digital Therapeutic Intervention with an Intensive Obesity Management Program: Randomized Controlled Trial.数字治疗干预与强化肥胖管理项目的比较:随机对照试验。
Nutrients. 2022 May 10;14(10):2005. doi: 10.3390/nu14102005.
2
Comparing the Efficacy of Digital and In-Person Weight Loss Interventions for Patients with Obesity and Glycemic Disorders: Evidence from a Randomized Non-Inferiority Trial.比较数字化与线下体重干预对肥胖伴血糖紊乱患者的疗效:一项随机非劣效性试验的证据。
Nutrients. 2024 May 16;16(10):1510. doi: 10.3390/nu16101510.
3
Impact of a Digital Lifestyle Intervention on Diabetes Self-Management: A Pilot Study.数字生活方式干预对糖尿病自我管理的影响:一项试点研究。
Nutrients. 2022 Apr 26;14(9):1810. doi: 10.3390/nu14091810.
4
Effect of a Lifestyle Intervention Program With Energy-Restricted Mediterranean Diet and Exercise on Weight Loss and Cardiovascular Risk Factors: One-Year Results of the PREDIMED-Plus Trial.生活方式干预项目对体重减轻和心血管危险因素的影响:PREDIMED-Plus 试验一年的结果。
Diabetes Care. 2019 May;42(5):777-788. doi: 10.2337/dc18-0836. Epub 2018 Nov 2.
5
Mobile Delivery of the Diabetes Prevention Program in People With Prediabetes: Randomized Controlled Trial.移动医疗在糖尿病前期人群中应用糖尿病预防计划的随机对照试验。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020 Jul 8;8(7):e17842. doi: 10.2196/17842.
6
Effects of A 12-Month Intensive Lifestyle Monitoring Program in Predominantly Overweight/Obese Arab Adults with Prediabetes.主要为超重/肥胖的、患有前驱糖尿病的阿拉伯成年人提供为期 12 个月的强化生活方式监测计划的效果。
Nutrients. 2020 Feb 12;12(2):464. doi: 10.3390/nu12020464.
7
Effects of a weight management program on body composition and metabolic parameters in overweight children: a randomized controlled trial.体重管理计划对超重儿童身体成分和代谢参数的影响:一项随机对照试验
JAMA. 2007 Jun 27;297(24):2697-704. doi: 10.1001/jama.297.24.2697.
8
Long-term Weight Loss in a Primary Care-Anchored eHealth Lifestyle Coaching Program: Randomized Controlled Trial.基于初级保健的电子健康生活方式教练计划的长期减肥效果:随机对照试验。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Sep 23;24(9):e39741. doi: 10.2196/39741.
9
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
10
Effectiveness of an mHealth Intervention Combining a Smartphone App and Smart Band on Body Composition in an Overweight and Obese Population: Randomized Controlled Trial (EVIDENT 3 Study).基于智能手机应用程序和智能手环的移动医疗干预措施对超重和肥胖人群身体成分的影响:随机对照试验(EVIDENT 3 研究)
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020 Nov 26;8(11):e21771. doi: 10.2196/21771.

引用本文的文献

1
Effectiveness of Physical Exercise on Indicators of Metabolic Syndrome in Adults: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis of Clinical Trials.体育锻炼对成人代谢综合征指标的有效性:一项对临床试验进行荟萃分析的系统评价
J Funct Morphol Kinesiol. 2025 Jun 27;10(3):244. doi: 10.3390/jfmk10030244.
2
Evaluation of the Impact of Mobile Health App Vitadio in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes: Randomized Controlled Trial.移动健康应用程序Vitadio对2型糖尿病患者影响的评估:随机对照试验。
J Med Internet Res. 2025 May 9;27:e68648. doi: 10.2196/68648.
3
Digital Health Interventions to Prevent Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: Systematic Review.

本文引用的文献

1
Nutrition Concepts for the Treatment of Obesity in Adults.成人肥胖治疗的营养理念。
Nutrients. 2021 Dec 30;14(1):169. doi: 10.3390/nu14010169.
2
Nutrition and Cardiovascular Diseases.营养与心血管疾病
Nutrients. 2021 Dec 27;14(1):94. doi: 10.3390/nu14010094.
3
Impact of Obesity in Kidney Diseases.肥胖对肾脏疾病的影响。
预防2型糖尿病的数字健康干预措施:系统评价
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Apr 25;27:e67507. doi: 10.2196/67507.
4
Adoption of Digital Therapeutics in Europe.数字疗法在欧洲的应用。
Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2024 Dec 27;20:939-954. doi: 10.2147/TCRM.S489873. eCollection 2024.
5
Research on disease management of chronic disease patients based on digital therapeutics: A scoping review.基于数字疗法的慢性病患者疾病管理研究:一项范围综述。
Digit Health. 2024 Nov 8;10:20552076241297064. doi: 10.1177/20552076241297064. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec.
6
Efficacy of WeChat-Based Digital Intervention Versus Metformin in Women With Polycystic Ovary Syndrome: Randomized Controlled Trial.基于微信的数字干预与二甲双胍治疗多囊卵巢综合征女性的疗效比较:随机对照试验
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Oct 2;26:e55883. doi: 10.2196/55883.
7
Exploring the potential of digital therapeutics: An assessment of progress and promise.探索数字疗法的潜力:对进展与前景的评估。
Digit Health. 2024 Sep 12;10:20552076241277441. doi: 10.1177/20552076241277441. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec.
8
Health-promotion interventions targeting multiple behaviors: A meta-analytic review of general and behavior-specific processes of change.促进健康的干预措施针对多种行为:一般和行为特定变化过程的元分析综述。
Psychol Bull. 2024 Jul;150(7):798-838. doi: 10.1037/bul0000427. Epub 2024 Jun 24.
9
Comparing the Efficacy of Digital and In-Person Weight Loss Interventions for Patients with Obesity and Glycemic Disorders: Evidence from a Randomized Non-Inferiority Trial.比较数字化与线下体重干预对肥胖伴血糖紊乱患者的疗效:一项随机非劣效性试验的证据。
Nutrients. 2024 May 16;16(10):1510. doi: 10.3390/nu16101510.
10
Assessing Discriminant Validity through Structural Equation Modeling: The Case of Eating Compulsivity.采用结构方程建模评估判别效度:以进食强迫为例。
Nutrients. 2024 Feb 16;16(4):550. doi: 10.3390/nu16040550.
Nutrients. 2021 Dec 15;13(12):4482. doi: 10.3390/nu13124482.
4
An Innovative Approach to Designing Digital Health Solutions Addressing the Unmet Needs of Obese Patients in Europe.设计数字健康解决方案的创新方法,以满足欧洲肥胖患者的未满足需求。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jan 12;18(2):579. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18020579.
5
The effect of digital physical activity interventions on daily step count: a randomised controlled crossover substudy of the MyHeart Counts Cardiovascular Health Study.数字体力活动干预对日常步数的影响:MyHeart Counts 心血管健康研究的一项随机对照交叉亚研究。
Lancet Digit Health. 2019 Nov;1(7):e344-e352. doi: 10.1016/S2589-7500(19)30129-3. Epub 2019 Oct 9.
6
Rates of Attrition and Dropout in App-Based Interventions for Chronic Disease: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.基于应用程序的慢性病干预措施的脱落率和辍学率:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Sep 29;22(9):e20283. doi: 10.2196/20283.
7
Experiences of providers in delivering nutrition-focused lifestyle interventions for adults with obesity or metabolic syndrome in primary healthcare settings: a qualitative systematic review protocol.初级医疗保健机构中医疗服务提供者为肥胖或代谢综合征成人提供以营养为重点的生活方式干预措施的经验:一项定性系统评价方案
JBI Evid Synth. 2020 Jul;18(7):1573-1579. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-D-19-00182.
8
Mapping the Evidence on the Effectiveness of Telemedicine Interventions in Diabetes, Dyslipidemia, and Hypertension: An Umbrella Review of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses.梳理远程医疗干预对糖尿病、血脂异常和高血压有效性的证据:系统评价和荟萃分析的伞状综述
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Mar 18;22(3):e16791. doi: 10.2196/16791.
9
Diabetes Digital App Technology: Benefits, Challenges, and Recommendations. A Consensus Report by the European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD) and the American Diabetes Association (ADA) Diabetes Technology Working Group.糖尿病数字应用技术:效益、挑战和建议。欧洲糖尿病研究协会 (EASD) 和美国糖尿病协会 (ADA) 糖尿病技术工作组的共识报告。
Diabetes Care. 2020 Jan;43(1):250-260. doi: 10.2337/dci19-0062. Epub 2019 Dec 5.
10
Prescribable mHealth apps identified from an overview of systematic reviews.从系统评价综述中识别出的可开具处方的移动健康应用程序。
NPJ Digit Med. 2018 May 9;1:12. doi: 10.1038/s41746-018-0021-9. eCollection 2018.