Suppr超能文献

直接口服抗凝剂与维生素K拮抗剂治疗抗磷脂综合征的系统评价和荟萃分析

Direct oral anticoagulants versus Vitamin K antagonists in antiphospholipid syndrome: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

作者信息

Celia Alessandra Ida, Vescovo Giovanni Maria, Sarto Gianmarco, Alessandri Cristiano, Iaconelli Antonio, D'Amario Domenico, Frati Giacomo, Conti Fabrizio, Sciarretta Sebastiano, Angiolillo Dominick J, Fava Andrea, Petri Michelle A, Bikdeli Behnood, Galli Mattia

机构信息

Rheumatology, Department of Clinical Internal, Anestesiological e Cardiovascular Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.

Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Science, Ospedale dell'Angelo, Venice, Italy.

出版信息

Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2025 Aug;73:152741. doi: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2025.152741. Epub 2025 May 1.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the efficacy and safety of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) versus Vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) in patients with thrombotic antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) have yielded inconsistent results, partly due to the inherent challenges of conducting RCTs in populations with rare medical conditions. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the comparative effects of DOACs versus VKAs in thrombotic APS.

METHODS

RCTs and observational studies comparing DOACs versus VKAs in patients with thrombotic APS were included. The primary endpoint was a composite of arterial (ATE) and venous thrombotic events (VTE). Incidence rate ratios (IRRs) and associated 95 % confidence intervals (CI) were used to account for different follow-up durations. GRADE was used for rating the certainty of evidence.

FINDINGS

Twelve studies, four randomized and eight observational, encompassing a total of 1307 APS patients were included. The use of DOACs was associated with an increase in the primary endpoint (IRR 2.33; 95 % CI 1.18-4.58; GRADE=moderate) driven by increased ATE (IRR 2.70; 95 % CI 1.42-5.13; GRADE=low), compared with the use of VKA. VTE (IRR 0.98; 95 % CI 0.59-1.64; GRADE=low), major (IRR 0.83; 95 % CI 0.48-1.43; GRADE=low) and non-major (IRR 1.32; 95 % CI 0.81-2.14; GRADE=very low) bleeding did not differ significantly between groups. Compared with VKAs, DOACs were associated with an increase in myocardial infarction (IRR 4.71; 95 % CI 1.00-22.21; GRADE=very low) and stroke (IRR 7.48; 95 % CI 1.27-44.13; GRADE=very low). The increased risk of arterial thrombotic events with DOACs was consistently observed in a dedicated analysis of RCTs and was mitigated by the concomitant use of single antiplatelet therapy.

INTERPRETATION

In patients with thrombotic APS, the use of DOACs is associated with increased thrombotic events compared with VKAs, mainly driven by arterial thrombotic events. A single antiplatelet therapy combined with DOACs maight offer a promising alternative to VKAs, warranting further dedicated investigations.

PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE

The study was not funded.

PROTOCOL REGISTRATION

This study is registered in PROSPERO (CRD42024582033).

摘要

背景

比较直接口服抗凝剂(DOACs)与维生素K拮抗剂(VKAs)在血栓形成性抗磷脂综合征(APS)患者中的疗效和安全性的随机对照试验(RCTs)结果并不一致,部分原因是在患有罕见疾病的人群中进行RCTs存在固有的挑战。我们进行了一项系统评价和荟萃分析,以评估DOACs与VKAs在血栓形成性APS中的比较效果。

方法

纳入比较DOACs与VKAs在血栓形成性APS患者中的RCTs和观察性研究。主要终点是动脉(ATE)和静脉血栓形成事件(VTE)的复合终点。发病率比(IRRs)和相关的95%置信区间(CI)用于考虑不同的随访时间。GRADE用于评估证据的确定性。

结果

纳入了12项研究,其中4项为随机研究,8项为观察性研究,共1307例APS患者。与使用VKA相比,使用DOACs与主要终点增加相关(IRR 2.33;95%CI 1.18-4.58;GRADE=中等),这是由ATE增加驱动的(IRR 2.70;95%CI 1.42-5.13;GRADE=低)。VTE(IRR 0.98;95%CI 0.59-1.64;GRADE=低)、大出血(IRR 0.83;95%CI 0.48-1.43;GRADE=低)和非大出血(IRR 1.32;95%CI 0.81-2.14;GRADE=极低)在两组之间没有显著差异。与VKAs相比,DOACs与心肌梗死增加相关(IRR 4.71;95%CI 1.00-22.21;GRADE=极低)和中风增加相关(IRR 7.48;95%CI 1.27-44.13;GRADE=极低)。在对RCTs的专门分析中,持续观察到DOACs增加动脉血栓形成事件的风险,并且通过同时使用单一抗血小板治疗可以减轻这种风险。

解读

在血栓形成性APS患者中,与VKAs相比,使用DOACs与血栓形成事件增加相关,主要由动脉血栓形成事件驱动。DOACs联合单一抗血小板治疗可能是VKAs的一个有前景的替代方案,值得进一步专门研究。

主要资金来源

本研究未获得资助。

方案注册

本研究已在PROSPERO注册(CRD42024582033)。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验