• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

通过对地区癌症中心的多学科团队进行虚拟培训来实施重症护理计划的经验。

Experience implementing the serious illness care program through virtual training of multidisciplinary teams at a regional cancer centre.

作者信息

Leong Russell, Andreychuk Sandra, Shoemaker Cheryl, Georgiou Georgia, Adjekum Helena, Locis Ruth, Sultana Adrienne, Vadivelu Suganya, Levine Oren

机构信息

Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.

Hamilton Health Sciences, Hamilton, ON, Canada.

出版信息

Support Care Cancer. 2025 May 10;33(6):468. doi: 10.1007/s00520-025-09525-3.

DOI:10.1007/s00520-025-09525-3
PMID:40347316
Abstract

PURPOSE

The Serious Illness Care Program (SICP) was launched at the Juravinski Cancer Centre (JCC) to promote early, high-quality goals of care conversations with patients experiencing advanced cancer. Training was provided to multidisciplinary disease site teams (DSTs). The objective of this study is to validate the virtual SICP training format and assess the clinician and patient experience after 6 months of implementation.

METHODS

Clinicians completed SICP training through a virtual workshop on Zoom and responded to surveys describing their experience before and after the training. Clinicians then completed a validated survey 6 months later, describing their experience of implementing serious illness conversations (SIC) into practice. Consenting patients were contacted within 2 weeks of a SIC encounter and responded to validated questions about their experience.

RESULTS

Training was provided to 52 healthcare providers in the breast, lung and brain malignancy DSTs. Overall, the virtual training format was well received. Training could be improved by allowing more time to practice skills and including more video examples. By 6 months, 39% of clinicians reported conducting SIC. Most users reported that SIC helps them understand patient goals. Among non-users, insufficient time was the most cited barrier. Nurses in a non-primary care model reported difficulty engaging in SIC. Most patients felt that SIC was a worthwhile experience.

CONCLUSION

Our study demonstrates the feasibility of the virtual SICP implementation process. Additionally, SICP was successfully delivered across multidisciplinary DSTs. Training will continue rolling out incrementally for all DSTs at the JCC, exploring the incorporation of self-learning modules.

摘要

目的

重病护理项目(SICP)在朱拉温斯基癌症中心(JCC)启动,以促进与晚期癌症患者尽早开展高质量的护理目标对话。为多学科疾病部位团队(DSTs)提供了培训。本研究的目的是验证虚拟SICP培训形式,并评估实施6个月后的临床医生和患者体验。

方法

临床医生通过Zoom上的虚拟研讨会完成SICP培训,并回复描述培训前后体验的调查问卷。6个月后,临床医生完成一份经过验证的调查问卷,描述他们在实践中开展重病对话(SIC)的体验。在SIC接触后的2周内联系同意参与的患者,并回复关于他们体验的经过验证的问题。

结果

为乳腺癌、肺癌和脑恶性肿瘤DSTs的52名医疗服务提供者提供了培训。总体而言,虚拟培训形式受到好评。可以通过留出更多时间练习技能和增加更多视频示例来改进培训。到6个月时,39%的临床医生报告开展了SIC。大多数用户报告说,SIC有助于他们理解患者的目标。在非用户中,时间不足是最常被提及的障碍。非初级护理模式的护士报告在参与SIC方面存在困难。大多数患者认为SIC是一次有价值的体验。

结论

我们的研究证明了虚拟SICP实施过程的可行性。此外,SICP已成功在多学科DSTs中推行。培训将继续在JCC的所有DSTs中逐步推出,探索纳入自学模块。

相似文献

1
Experience implementing the serious illness care program through virtual training of multidisciplinary teams at a regional cancer centre.通过对地区癌症中心的多学科团队进行虚拟培训来实施重症护理计划的经验。
Support Care Cancer. 2025 May 10;33(6):468. doi: 10.1007/s00520-025-09525-3.
2
Clinicians' Perspectives After Implementation of the Serious Illness Care Program: A Qualitative Study.实施重症护理计划后临床医生的观点:一项定性研究。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Aug 2;4(8):e2121517. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.21517.
3
Impact of Implementing Serious Illness Conversations Across a Comprehensive Cancer Center Using an Interdisciplinary Approach.采用跨学科方法在综合癌症中心开展重症谈话的影响
Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2025 Mar;42(3):253-260. doi: 10.1177/10499091241252058. Epub 2024 May 10.
4
Impact of a team-based versus individual clinician-focused training approach on primary healthcare professionals' intention to have serious illness conversations with patients: A theory-informed process evaluation embedded within a cluster randomized trial.基于团队与以个体临床医生为中心的培训方法对初级医疗保健专业人员与患者进行重病谈话意愿的影响:一项纳入整群随机试验的理论导向过程评估
PLoS One. 2025 Mar 26;20(3):e0298994. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0298994. eCollection 2025.
5
Clinicians' Perspectives on the Telehealth Serious Illness Care Program for Older Adults With Myeloid Malignancies: Single-Arm Pilot Study.临床医生对老年骨髓恶性肿瘤患者远程医疗重症护理项目的看法:单臂试点研究。
JMIR Form Res. 2024 Jun 27;8:e58503. doi: 10.2196/58503.
6
The Pediatric Serious Illness Conversation Program: Understanding challenges and experiences for clinicians after advance care planning training.儿科重症疾病沟通项目:了解临床医生在预先护理计划培训后的挑战与经历。
Palliat Support Care. 2024 Oct;22(5):1048-1055. doi: 10.1017/S1478951523000500.
7
Improving Serious Illness Communication: Testing the Serious Illness Care Program with Trainees.改善重症沟通:对实习生试用重症护理项目。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2022 Feb;63(2):e252-e259. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2021.10.013. Epub 2021 Nov 4.
8
Lessons Learned About System-Level Improvement in Serious Illness Communication: A Qualitative Study of Serious Illness Care Program Implementation in Five Health Systems.从严重疾病沟通的系统层面改进中吸取的经验教训:对五个卫生系统中的严重疾病护理计划实施情况进行的定性研究。
Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2023 Nov;49(11):620-633. doi: 10.1016/j.jcjq.2023.06.013. Epub 2023 Jun 29.
9
The Team-Based Serious Illness Care Program, A Qualitative Evaluation of Implementation and Teaming.基于团队的严重疾病护理项目:实施与团队协作的质性评估
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2023 Jun;65(6):521-531. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2023.01.024. Epub 2023 Feb 9.
10
Implementing Serious Illness Communication Processes in Primary Care: A Qualitative Study.在初级保健中实施严重疾病沟通流程:一项定性研究。
Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2021 May;38(5):459-466. doi: 10.1177/1049909120951095. Epub 2020 Aug 14.

本文引用的文献

1
Physicians' perceptions of the implementation of the serious illness care program: a qualitative study.医生对重病护理计划实施的看法:一项定性研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Dec 12;23(1):1401. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-10419-5.
2
Lessons Learned from a Multi-Site, Team-Based Serious Illness Care Program Implementation at an Academic Medical Center.在一家学术医疗中心实施多地点、基于团队的重症护理项目所吸取的经验教训。
J Palliat Med. 2024 Jan;27(1):83-89. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2023.0254. Epub 2023 Nov 8.
3
Lessons Learned About System-Level Improvement in Serious Illness Communication: A Qualitative Study of Serious Illness Care Program Implementation in Five Health Systems.
从严重疾病沟通的系统层面改进中吸取的经验教训:对五个卫生系统中的严重疾病护理计划实施情况进行的定性研究。
Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2023 Nov;49(11):620-633. doi: 10.1016/j.jcjq.2023.06.013. Epub 2023 Jun 29.
4
Improving serious illness communication: a qualitative study of clinical culture.改善重病沟通:临床文化的定性研究。
BMC Palliat Care. 2023 Jul 22;22(1):104. doi: 10.1186/s12904-023-01229-x.
5
The Team-Based Serious Illness Care Program, A Qualitative Evaluation of Implementation and Teaming.基于团队的严重疾病护理项目:实施与团队协作的质性评估
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2023 Jun;65(6):521-531. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2023.01.024. Epub 2023 Feb 9.
6
Serious Illness Communication Training Among Radiation Oncology Residents.肿瘤放射治疗住院医师严重疾病沟通培训。
Pract Radiat Oncol. 2023 May-Jun;13(3):e220-e229. doi: 10.1016/j.prro.2022.11.008. Epub 2022 Dec 14.
7
Virtual Geritalk: Does Intensive Virtual Communication Skills Training Improve Use of Serious Illness Communication Skills?虚拟老年病学对话:强化虚拟沟通技巧训练是否能提高严重疾病沟通技巧的使用?
Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2023 Jun;40(6):620-623. doi: 10.1177/10499091221116078. Epub 2022 Jul 20.
8
Patient Identification for Serious Illness Conversations: A Scoping Review.严重疾病谈话中的患者识别:范围综述。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Mar 31;19(7):4162. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19074162.
9
The Serious Illness Care Program in Oncology: Evidence, Real-World Implementation and Ongoing Barriers.肿瘤学中的重症疾病护理计划:证据、现实世界的实施和持续存在的障碍。
Curr Oncol. 2022 Mar 2;29(3):1527-1536. doi: 10.3390/curroncol29030128.
10
Prevalence and Workplace Drivers of Burnout in Cancer Care Physicians in Ontario, Canada.加拿大安大略省癌症护理医生职业倦怠的患病率及工作场所驱动因素
JCO Oncol Pract. 2022 Jan;18(1):e60-e71. doi: 10.1200/OP.21.00170. Epub 2021 Sep 10.